Reading With Optical Magnifiers: Page Navigation Strategies and Difficulties

Purpose. To read efficiently with a simple hand or stand magnifier, people with visual impairment have to move (navigate) the device along each line (forward phase) and back to the correct position at the start of the next line (retrace phase). Page navigation difficulties have been implicated as limiting factors when reading with hand and stand magnifiers, but have not been objectively measured. Methods. Magnifier movements were recorded using a 3SPACE Isotrak system for 43 participants with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who read two short stories using their habitual hand or stand magnifier. Page navigation was quantified in terms of magnifier movements and navigation errors for the forward and retrace phases. Visual acuities and visual fields were measured, and magnifier usage and page navigation difficulties were surveyed. Results. During the forward phase, participants primarily used either a straight (47%) or diagonal downward (46%) movement, whereas during the retrace phase, the majority (56%) used a downward movement. On average, forward navigation time was four times longer than retrace navigation time (p < 0.001). The most common navigation error was incorrect positioning of the magnifier at the end of the retrace movement. Near word acuity correlated strongly with forward time (r = 0.78), and moderately with retrace time (r = 0.53) and forward errors (r = 0.50). Vertical field of view correlated with retrace errors (r = −0.53). Participants’ estimates of page navigation difficulties were not predictive of objective measures of performance. Conclusions. We quantified page navigation strategies and difficulties of people with AMD reading with magnifiers. Retrace, which presents the most common difficulty, is not well predicted by vision measures or magnifier characteristics; future studies should investigate the relationship between motor skills and navigation performance, and the impact of training or devices on reducing retrace navigation difficulties.

[1]  Paul J. Beckmann,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading—XIV. The Page Navigation Problem in Using Magnifiers , 1996, Vision Research.

[2]  K Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Characteristics of discrepancies between self-reported visual function and measured reading speed. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  R. Harper,et al.  Evaluating the outcomes of low vision rehabilitation , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[5]  Gregory L. Goodrich,et al.  Goldilocks and the three training models: A comparison of three models of low vision reading training on reading efficiency , 2004 .

[6]  S. Whittaker,et al.  Visual Requirements for Reading , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  Hugo Bruggeman,et al.  Visual requirements for reading: The importance of a large field of view in reading with a magnifier , 1996 .

[8]  P. Beek,et al.  Reading with magnifiers. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[9]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Low Vision Magnifiers—Their Optical Parameters and Methods for Prescribing , 1994, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[10]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Printed cards for measuring low-vision reading speed , 1995, Vision Research.

[11]  I L Bailey,et al.  The Design and Use of a New Near‐Vision Chart , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[12]  J. Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  Hearing and vision in healthy older Australians: Objective and self-report measures , 1999 .

[13]  M J Graney,et al.  Comparison of subjective ratings of function with observed functional ability of frail older persons. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[14]  Alex R Bowers,et al.  Does a Line Guide Improve Reading Performance with Stand Magnifiers? , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  Alex R Bowers,et al.  Short-Term In-Office Practice Improves Reading Performance with Stand Magnifiers for People with AMD , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Reading Rate: A Review of Research and Theory , 1990 .

[17]  N J Rumney,et al.  The experience of a university‐based low vision clinic , 1990, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.