Social Contagion: An Empirical Study of Information Spread on Digg and Twitter Follower Graphs

Social networks have emerged as a critical factor in information dissemination, search, marketing, expertise and influence discovery, and potentially an important tool for mobilizing people. Social media has made social networks ubiquitous, and also given researchers access to massive quantities of data for empirical analysis. These data sets offer a rich source of evidence for studying dynamics of individual and group behavior, the structure of networks and global patterns of the flow of information on them. However, in most previous studies, the structure of the underlying networks was not directly visible but had to be inferred from the flow of information from one individual to another. As a result, we do not yet understand dynamics of information spread on networks or how the structure of the network affects it. We address this gap by analyzing data from two popular social news sites. Specifically, we extract follower graphs of active Digg and Twitter users and track how interest in news stories cascades through the graph. We compare and contrast properties of information cascades on both sites and elucidate what they tell us about dynamics of information flow on networks.

[1]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Entropy-based Classification of 'Retweeting' Activity on Twitter , 2011, ArXiv.

[2]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Tracing information flow on a global scale using Internet chain-letter data , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[4]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  A framework for quantitative analysis of cascades on networks , 2010, WSDM '11.

[5]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Using a model of social dynamics to predict popularity of news , 2010, WWW '10.

[6]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Information flow in social groups , 2003, cond-mat/0305305.

[7]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Predicting Influential Users in Online Social Networks , 2010, ArXiv.

[8]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[9]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[10]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Cascading Behavior in Large Blog Graphs , 2007 .

[11]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[12]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[13]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Diversity of User Activity and Content Quality in Online Communities , 2009, ICWSM.

[14]  Eyton,et al.  The Diffusion of Innovations in Social Networks , 2002 .

[15]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[17]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  How to search a social network , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[18]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[19]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Stochastic Models of User-Contributory Web Sites , 2009, ICWSM.

[20]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Modeling bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[22]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Statistical properties of community structure in large social and information networks , 2008, WWW.

[23]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Information diffusion through blogspace , 2004, WWW '04.

[24]  Sebastian Bernhardsson,et al.  Zipf's law unzipped , 2011, ArXiv.

[25]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[26]  Dennis M. Wilkinson,et al.  Strong regularities in online peer production , 2008, EC '08.

[27]  Kristina Lerman User Participation in Social Media: Digg Study , 2007, 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Workshops.

[28]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  What Stops Social Epidemics? , 2011, ICWSM.

[29]  Fang Wu,et al.  Novelty and collective attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[31]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Analysis of social voting patterns on digg , 2008, WOSN '08.

[32]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Epidemic spreading in real networks: an eigenvalue viewpoint , 2003, 22nd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, 2003. Proceedings..

[33]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Social dynamics of Digg , 2010, EPJ Data Science.

[34]  Jiye Yu,et al.  iLink: search and routing in social networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[35]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  The dynamics of viral marketing , 2005, EC '06.

[36]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[37]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Viral, Quality, and Junk Videos on YouTube: Separating Content from Noise in an Information-Rich Environment , 2008, AAAI Spring Symposium: Social Information Processing.

[38]  D. Boyd,et al.  The Arab Spring| The Revolutions Were Tweeted: Information Flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions , 2011 .

[39]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Social Information Processing in News Aggregation , 2007, IEEE Internet Computing.

[40]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.

[41]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Information Contagion: An Empirical Study of the Spread of News on Digg and Twitter Social Networks , 2010, ICWSM.

[42]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Social Information Processing in Social News Aggregation , 2007, ArXiv.