Notions of position in social network analysis

The notion of position is fundamental in structural theory. However, at least two profoundly different conceptions of position exist. The two basic types of position have radically different characteristics, making them appropriate for different theoretical applications. We present examples in which scholars have operationalized one type of position but drawn conclusions as if the other type had been used. We compare the two notions of position in terms of their applicability in several research areas, including power in exchange networks, role theory, world-system theory, and social homogeneity.

[1]  R. Linton.  The Study of Man , 1937 .

[2]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[3]  R. Luce,et al.  A method of matrix analysis of group structure , 1949, Psychometrika.

[4]  R. Luce,et al.  Connectivity and generalized cliques in sociometric group structure , 1950, Psychometrika.

[5]  H. Leavitt.  Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[6]  J. Coleman,et al.  The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians , 1957 .

[7]  S. Nadel.  The Theory of Social Structure , 1957 .

[8]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[9]  William M. Evan,et al.  Toward a Theory of Inter-Organizational Relations , 1965 .

[10]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[11]  H. White,et al.  “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  Klaus Krippendorff.  Communication and the Genesis of Structure , 1971 .

[13]  R. Alba.  A graph‐theoretic definition of a sociometric clique† , 1973 .

[14]  P. Arabie,et al.  An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling , 1975 .

[15]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Positions in Networks , 1976 .

[16]  S. Boorman,et al.  Social structure from multiple networks: I , 1976 .

[17]  S. Boorman,et al.  Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Immanuel Wallerstein,et al.  The modern world system [audiorecording] , 1977 .

[19]  R. J. Mokken,et al.  Cliques, clubs and clans , 1979 .

[20]  Forrest R. Pitts,et al.  The medieval river trade network of Russia revisited , 1978 .

[21]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[22]  Stephen B. Seidman,et al.  A graph‐theoretic generalization of the clique concept* , 1978 .

[23]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[24]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  CHAPTER 8 – NETWORK ANALYSIS OF THE DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS1 , 1979 .

[25]  E. Kick,et al.  Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955-1970: A Multiple-Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Ronald L. Breiger,et al.  Structures of Economic Interdependence among Nations , 1982 .

[27]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  Testing a structural model of perception: Conformity and deviance with respect to Journal norms in elite sociological methodology , 1982 .

[28]  K. Cook,et al.  The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  Samuel Leinhardt,et al.  Roles and Positions: A Critique and Extension of the Blockmodeling Approach , 1983 .

[30]  K. Reitz,et al.  Graph and Semigroup Homomorphisms on Networks of Relations , 1983 .

[31]  Karl R. Krohn,et al.  Positions, Roles, and Dependencies in a Community Interorganization System* , 1984 .

[32]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Structural Cohesion and Equivalence Explanations of Social Homogeneity , 1984 .

[33]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Role similarity and complexity in social networks , 1985 .

[34]  D. Hofstadter.  Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern , 1985 .

[35]  P. Pattison,et al.  Cumulated social roles: The duality of persons and their algebras☆ , 1986 .

[36]  Christopher Winship.  Thoughts about roles and relations: An old document revisited , 1988 .

[37]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Calculating role similarities: An algorithm that helps determine the orbits of a graph , 1988 .

[38]  Katherine Faust.  Comparison of methods for positional analysis: Structural and general equivalences☆ , 1988 .

[39]  Philippa Pattison,et al.  Network models: Some comments on papers in this special issue , 1988 .

[40]  Gregory A. Caldeira.  Legal precedent: Structures of communication between state supreme courts , 1988 .

[41]  David Willer,et al.  Power Relations in Exchange Networks , 1988 .

[42]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The class of all regular equivalences: Algebraic structure and computation☆ , 1989 .

[43]  John P. Boyd,et al.  ITERATED ROLES: MATHEMATICS AND APPLICATION , 1989 .

[44]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Social Contagion and Multiplexity Communication Networks as Predictors of Commitment and Role Ambiguity , 1989 .

[45]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Ego‐centered and local roles: A graph theoretic approach , 1990 .

[46]  S. Borgatti,et al.  LS sets, lambda sets and other cohesive subsets , 1990 .