Increased drug load and polymer compatibility of bilayered orodispersible films

Abstract The addition of enalapril maleate to a casting solution for orodispersible films (ODFs) containing hypromellose and carbomer 974P as film forming agents (standard casting solution, SCS) caused a dose dependent reduction of the viscosity. This phenomenon was a serious problem in the preparation of ODFs with an increased enalapril load (> 1 mg per ODF) when using the solvent casting method. The aim of the present work was twofold. Firstly, the influence of enalapril on the viscosity of SCS was studied in more detail. Secondly, two methods for increasing the enalapril load of an ODF were investigated that did not negatively influence the properties of SCS. The casting height was increased and the preparation of bilayered ODF, using the double‐casting method, was explored. In the framework of the bilayered ODFs the compatibility between the film forming agents hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), sodium alginate (SA), hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) and the combination hypromellose–carbomer 974P (SCS) was investigated. Results and conclusions We found that enalapril concentration dependently reduced the pH, thereby negatively influencing the gel formation and the viscosity of SCS. An increased casting height did not result in a proportionally increased enalapril load. The enalapril load could be doubled when a bilayered ODF containing two layers of SCS was produced. Finally, not all combinations of film forming agents could be used for the preparation of bilayered ODFs. Besides, the sequence in which the different polymer layers were casted affected the appearance of the ODFs. In conclusion, the best formulations were produced with the polymer combinations SCS/SCS and SCS/HPC. Graphical abstract SEM images of bilayered orodispersible films showing (in)compatibility of polymers applied. Left: two layers of sodium alginate; right: one layer of sodium alginate and one layer of hypromellose combined with carbomer 974P. Figure. No Caption available.

[1]  Eva Maria Hoffmann,et al.  Advances in orodispersible films for drug delivery , 2011, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[2]  Niklas Sandler,et al.  Tailoring controlled-release oral dosage forms by combining inkjet and flexographic printing techniques. , 2012, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[3]  Maren Preis,et al.  Design and evaluation of bilayered buccal film preparations for local administration of lidocaine hydrochloride. , 2014, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[4]  P. Giunchedi,et al.  Preparation, In Vitro Characterization and Preliminary In Vivo Evaluation of Buccal Polymeric Films Containing Chlorhexidine , 2008, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[5]  Wouter L.J. Hinrichs,et al.  Practical Pharmaceutics, an international guideline for the preparation care and use of medicinal products , 2015 .

[6]  K. Himmelstein,et al.  Modification of in situ gelling behavior of carbopol solutions by hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. , 1995, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[7]  Johannes Khinast,et al.  Printable medicines: A microdosing device for producing personalised medicines , 2011 .

[8]  R. Dixit,et al.  Oral strip technology: overview and future potential. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[9]  P. Kleinebudde,et al.  Development of orodispersible polymer films containing poorly water soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients with focus on different drug loadings and storage stability. , 2015, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[10]  L. Kumar,et al.  FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF MOUTH DISSOLVING FILMS OF PARACETAMOL , 2014 .

[11]  Ana Filipa Borges,et al.  Oral films: Current status and future perspectives: I - Galenical development and quality attributes. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[12]  Y. Lam,et al.  Effects of salts in the Hofmeister series and solvent isotopes on the gelation mechanisms for hydroxypropylmethylcellulose hydrogels , 2008 .

[13]  Maren Preis,et al.  Oromucosal film preparations: points to consider for patient centricity and manufacturing processes , 2016, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[14]  Herman J. Woerdenbag,et al.  Orodispersible films in individualized pharmacotherapy: The development of a formulation for pharmacy preparations. , 2015, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[15]  Jörg Breitkreutz,et al.  Oromucosal multilayer films for tailor-made, controlled drug delivery , 2017, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[16]  Abdul W. Basit,et al.  Preparation of Personalized-dose Salbutamol Sulphate Oral Films with Thermal Ink-Jet Printing , 2011, Pharmaceutical Research.

[17]  Jörg Breitkreutz,et al.  Drug-printing by flexographic printing technology--a new manufacturing process for orodispersible films. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[18]  J. C. Visser,et al.  Quality by design approach for optimizing the formulation and physical properties of extemporaneously prepared orodispersible films. , 2015, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[19]  Maren Preis,et al.  Printed Drug-Delivery Systems for Improved Patient Treatment. , 2016, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[20]  John E. Hogan,et al.  The influence of additives on the cloud point, disintegration and dissolution of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose gels and matrix tablets , 1990 .

[21]  J. Boateng,et al.  Novel films for drug delivery via the buccal mucosa using model soluble and insoluble drugs , 2012, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.