Synthetic biology: ethical ramifications 2009

During 2007 and 2008 synthetic biology moved from the manifesto stage to research programs. As of 2009, synthetic biology is ramifying; to ramify means to produce differentiated trajectories from previous determinations. From its inception, most of the players in synthetic biology agreed on the need for (a) rationalized design and construction of new biological parts, devices, and systems as well as (b) the re-design of natural biological systems for specified purposes, and that (c) the versatility of designed biological systems makes them suitable to address such challenges as renewable energy, the production of inexpensive drugs, and environmental remediation, as well as providing a catalyst for further growth of biotechnology. What is understood by these goals, however, is diverse. Those assorted understandings are currently contributing to different ramifications of synthetic biology. The Berkeley Human Practices Lab, led by Paul Rabinow, is currently devoting its efforts to documenting and analyzing these ramifications as they emerge.

[1]  L. Keranen,et al.  Playing God? Human Genetic Engineering and the Rationalization of Public Bioethical Debate , 2003 .

[2]  J. Keasling,et al.  Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  George M Church,et al.  Towards synthesis of a minimal cell , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[4]  D. Guston.  Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Reseach , 2000 .

[5]  Weston R. Whitaker,et al.  Toward scalable parts families for predictable design of biological circuits. , 2008, Current opinion in microbiology.

[6]  Timothy S. Ham,et al.  Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast , 2006, Nature.

[7]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[8]  Michael G. Powell.  When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico , 2005 .

[9]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Environmentally controlled invasion of cancer cells by engineered bacteria. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Priscilla E. M. Purnick,et al.  The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  C. Mitcham,et al.  Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within , 2006 .

[12]  G. Khushf.  Upstream ethics in nanomedicine: a call for research. , 2007, Nanomedicine.

[13]  Ron Weiss,et al.  Engineering life: building a fab for biology. , 2006, Scientific American.

[14]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Science's new social contract with society , 1999, Nature.

[15]  E. Shils,et al.  The Methodology Of The Social Sciences , 1949 .

[16]  Steven Yearley,et al.  The ethical landscape: identifying the right way to think about the ethical and societal aspects of synthetic biology research and products , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  J Craig Venter,et al.  One-step assembly in yeast of 25 overlapping DNA fragments to form a complete synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  I. Hacking,et al.  How Experiments End , 1989 .

[19]  Kavita Philip,et al.  Tactical Biopolitics : Art, Activism, and Technoscience , 2008 .

[20]  Drew Endy,et al.  DNA synthesis and biological security , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Gregory Radick,et al.  The Century of the Gene , 2001, Heredity.

[22]  D. Endy,et al.  Refinement and standardization of synthetic biological parts and devices , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  E. Carlson.  :Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States , 2008 .

[24]  George Church,et al.  Let us go forth and safely multiply , 2005, Nature.

[25]  Alyssa M. Redding,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of n-butanol , 2008, Microbial cell factories.

[26]  Pasquale Stano,et al.  Semisynthetic Minimal Cells: New Advancements and Perspectives , 2008 .

[27]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Environmental Sociology: Theory and Practice@@@Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective@@@Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology , 1997 .

[28]  D. Endy.  Foundations for engineering biology , 2005, Nature.

[29]  S. Segawa,et al.  End of the beginning , 1990, Nature.

[30]  Mark A. Bedau,et al.  The ethics of protocells : moral and social implications of creating life in the laboratory , 2009 .

[31]  A. Jonsen.  The birth of bioethics. , 1993, The Hastings Center report.

[32]  Kevin V Solomon,et al.  Synthetic metabolism: engineering biology at the protein and pathway scales. , 2009, Chemistry & biology.

[33]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Pathway engineering by designed divergent evolution. , 2007, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[34]  Steen Rasmussen,et al.  Protocells : bridging nonliving and living matter , 2008 .

[35]  E. Andrianantoandro,et al.  Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[36]  Adam P. Arkin,et al.  Complex Systems: From chemistry to systems biology , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  L. Saunders,et al.  Permanence and change. , 1958, The American journal of nursing.

[38]  J. Boyle,et al.  Synthetic Biology: Caught between Property Rights, the Public Domain, and the Commons , 2007, PLoS biology.

[39]  M. Albornoz.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[40]  D. Guston.  David Guston ’ s Between Politics and Science : Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research * , 2000 .

[41]  A. Caplan.  A life decoded: My genome — my life , 2008 .

[42]  P. Rabinow.  Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment , 2003 .

[43]  James Wilsdon,et al.  See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream , 2004 .

[44]  G. Church,et al.  Accurate multiplex gene synthesis from programmable DNA microchips , 2004, Nature.

[45]  S. Shapin.  Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts , 1981, Medical History.

[46]  P. Rabinow,et al.  Human Practices: Interfacing Three Modes of Collaboration , 2009 .

[47]  Drew Endy,et al.  Synthetic genomics | options for governance. , 2007, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[48]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Managing Technology in Society , 1995 .

[49]  Benjamin Yang,et al.  "The genome war: how craig venter tried to capture the code of life and save the world". , 2004, Discovery medicine.

[50]  Maureen A. O’Malley,et al.  Knowledge-making distinctions in synthetic biology. , 2008, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[51]  Jacob Moses,et al.  Do We Need "Synthetic Bioethics"? , 2008, Science.

[52]  M. Burgess.  French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory , 2000 .

[53]  Adam Arkin,et al.  Setting the standard in synthetic biology , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[54]  Helge Torgersen,et al.  Of Newtons and heretics , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[55]  Joyce Tait,et al.  Synthetic Biology the technoscience and its societal consequences , 2009 .