Our work investigates the effect on the zero-spatial-frequency DQE of indirect mammographic image receptors of the combined effects of x-ray beam hardening and light photon transport within the x-ray sensitive medium of the image receptor. Beam hardening, in this context, refers to the preferential absorption of low-energy x-ray photons at the surface of the detector on which the x-ray beam is incident, with deeper layers of the detector absorbing higher and higher average energies. The light photon transport properties of both powder and crystalline/columnar phosphors favor the collection at the light-sensitive element of the detector of light photons generated closest to that element. The net result of these two effects is to perform a weighting of the detected x-ray spectrum. For the standard back-screen configuration used in conventional mammography, low-energy x rays are more heavily weighted, matching the energy dependence of the signal to be detected. For a front-screen configuration, used in all existing indirect-detection digital mammographic systems, just the opposite is true. We have used the optical Monte Carlo simulation code DETECT-II to determine average light collection efficiency and optical pulse distributions for a Min-R screen in both front- and back-screen configurations, and for two thicknesses of CsI, as a function of x-ray energy. These data, along with appropriately hardened x-ray spectra for several anode and filter combinations and a range of tube voltages, were used as input to the task-dependent DQE theory of Tapiovaara and Wagner.
[1]
Aldo Badano,et al.
Depth-dependent phosphor blur in indirect x-ray imaging sensors
,
2002,
SPIE Medical Imaging.
[2]
C E Dick,et al.
Image information transfer properties of x-ray fluorescent screens.
,
1981,
Medical physics.
[3]
S Suryanarayanan,et al.
Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.
,
2000,
Medical physics.
[4]
A Workman,et al.
A comparison of the imaging properties of CCD-based devices used for small field digital mammography.
,
2002,
Physics in medicine and biology.
[5]
Richard L. Van Metter,et al.
Conversion noise measurement for front and back x-ray intensifying screens
,
1990,
Medical Imaging.
[6]
M J Yaffe,et al.
Model of the spatial-frequency-dependent detective quantum efficiency of phosphor screens.
,
1990,
Medical physics.
[7]
B. Munier,et al.
Full field digital mammography scanner.
,
1999,
European journal of radiology.
[8]
Glenn F. Knoll,et al.
Light collection in scintillation detector composites for neutron detection
,
1988
.
[9]
Hans Roehrig,et al.
Digital Method To Evaluate The Noise Of X-Ray Image Intensifiers
,
1979,
Optics & Photonics.
[10]
Robert F. Wagner,et al.
A Generalized Detective Quantum Efficiency (DQE) Approach To The Analysis Of X-Ray Imaging
,
1984,
Other Conferences.
[11]
J. S. Laughlin,et al.
Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.
,
1979,
Radiology.