The purpose of this study was to generate contrast detail (CD) curves for low contrast mass lesions embedded in images obtained in head and neck CT examinations. Axial head and neck CT slice images were randomly chosen from patients at five different levels. All images were acquired at 120 kV, and reconstructed using a standard soft tissue reconstruction filter. For each head CT image, we measured detection of low contrast mass lesions using a 2 Alternate Forced Choice (2-AFC) experimental paradigm. In an AFC experiment, an observer identifies the lesion location in one of two regions of interest. After performing 128 sequential observations, it is possible to compute the lesion contrast corresponding to a 92% accuracy of lesion detection (i.e., I92%). Five lesion sizes were investigated ranging from 4 mm to 12.5 mm, with the experimental order randomized to eliminate learning curve as well as observer fatigue. Contrast detail curves were generated by plotting log[I92%] versus log[lesion size]. Experimental slopes ranged from ~ -0.1 to ~ -0.4. The slope of the CD curve was directly related to the complexity of the anatomical structure in the head CT image. As the apparent anatomical complexity increased, the slope of the corresponding CD curve was reduced. Results from our pilot study suggest that anatomical structure is of greater importance than quantum mottle, and that the type of anatomical background structure is an important determinant of lesion detection in CT imaging.
[1]
H. Kundel,et al.
Lesion conspicuity, structured noise, and film reader error.
,
1976,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[2]
Ehsan Samei,et al.
Reconstruction filters and contrast detail curves in CT
,
2008,
SPIE Medical Imaging.
[3]
A. Burgess,et al.
Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.
,
2001,
Medical physics.
[4]
Kent M. Ogden,et al.
How do kV and mAs affect CT lesion detection performance?
,
2007,
SPIE Medical Imaging.
[5]
L. Ginsberg.
Reinterpretation of head and neck scans: massive can of worms or call to action?
,
2002,
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.
[6]
E Samei,et al.
Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs.
,
1999,
Radiology.
[7]
Brian J. Schulman,et al.
Reinterpretation of cross-sectional images in patients with head and neck cancer in the setting of a multidisciplinary cancer center.
,
2002,
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.
[8]
William Hendee,et al.
The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques.
,
2010,
Medical physics.
[9]
A. Burgess.
Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods.
,
1995,
Medical physics.
[10]
A. Rose,et al.
Vision: human and electronic
,
1973
.