Employee share ownership in Germany: A cluster analysis of firms' aims

Politicians and scholars alike praise the significant benefits associated with employee share ownership (ESO). However, little is known about the concrete motives of firms to provide ESO to their employees. In particular, it is unknown how these motives correlate with firms’ contexts. Drawing on an institutional theoretical framework, this article examines what aims firms pursue through the provision of ESO. The data originate from a survey of firms in Germany. The cluster analytic findings indicate distinctive patterns of relationships between aims and firm characteristics. Aims related to employee performance are most important to foreign-owned firms, financial aims are most important to non-public small and medium-sized firms and aims related to corporate image are most important to big firms and to firms that do not provide profit sharing. Aims related to employee attraction and retention are almost equally important to all kinds of firms.

[1]  Simon Fietze.  The Promotion of Employee Ownership and Participation , 2014 .

[2]  J. Lampel,et al.  The Employee Ownership Advantage: Benefits and Consequences , 2012 .

[3]  Joseph R. Blasi,et al.  Employee share ownership and profit sharing in different institutional contexts , 2012 .

[4]  A. Pendleton,et al.  Employee share ownership and human capital development: Complementarity in theory and practice , 2011 .

[5]  A. Pendleton,et al.  Employee Stock Ownership, Involvement, and Productivity: An Interaction-Based Approach , 2010 .

[6]  E. Parry,et al.  The impact of bundles of strategic human resource management practices on the performance of European firms , 2008 .

[7]  Joseph R. Blasi,et al.  Shared Capitalism in the U.S. Economy? Prevalence, Characteristics, and Employee Views of Financial Participation in Enterprises , 2008 .

[8]  Sukanya Sengupta,et al.  Employee share ownership and performance: golden path or golden handcuffs? , 2007 .

[9]  Anja Tuschke,et al.  The Adoption Of Institutionally Contested Organizational Practices: The Emergence Of Stock Option Pay In Germany , 2007 .

[10]  W. Matiaske,et al.  Financial Participation in British, French and German Organizations: A Neoinstitutionalist Perspective , 2006 .

[11]  Erik Poutsma,et al.  The Fit of Employee Ownership with Other Human Resource Management Practices: Theoretical and Empirical Suggestions Regarding the Existence of an Ownership High-Performance Work System , 2006 .

[12]  E. Poutsma,et al.  The Relationship between Financial Participation and Other Forms of Employee Participation: New Survey Evidence from Europe , 2006 .

[13]  A. Pendleton.  Incentives, Monitoring, and Employee Stock Ownership Plans: New Evidence and Interpretations , 2006 .

[14]  M. Tyrrell.  Institutions and Organizations (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[15]  Margaret M. Blair.  Firm-Specific Human Capital and Theories of the Firm , 2003 .

[16]  Cameron Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Organizations (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[17]  E. Poutsma,et al.  Employee share ownership and profit-sharing in the European Union: incidence, company characteristics, and union representation , 2002 .

[18]  A. Pendleton.  Employee Ownership, Participation and Governance: A Study of ESOPs in the UK , 2001 .

[19]  John E. Core,et al.  Stock Option Plans for Non-Executive Employees , 2000 .

[20]  Uwe Jirjahn.  Incentives for Multitasking: Fixed Wages or Profit-sharing? , 2000 .

[21]  Rüdiger Kabst,et al.  Financial Participation in Europe-Determinants and Outcomes , 1999 .

[22]  Sarah Brown,et al.  Absenteeism and Employee Sharing: An Empirical Analysis Based on French Panel Data, 1981–1991 , 1999 .

[23]  R. Gibbons.  Incentives in Organizations , 1998 .

[24]  M. Wright.  The Perception and Effects of Share Ownership: Empirical Evidence from Employee Buy-Outs , 1998 .

[25]  A. Pendleton.  Characteristics of workplaces with financial participation: evidence from the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey , 1997 .

[26]  Derek C. Jones,et al.  Employee Participation, Ownership, and Productivity: A Theoretical Framework , 1995 .

[27]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure , 1995 .

[28]  Aaron A. Buchko.  THE EFFECTS OF EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES: AN INTEGRATED CAUSAL MODEL AND PATH ANALYSIS* , 1993 .

[29]  E. Lazear,et al.  Peer Pressure and Partnerships , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  Aaron A. Buchko.  Employee Ownership, Attitudes, and Turnover: An Empirical Assessment , 1992 .

[31]  Aaron A. Buchko.  Effects of Employee Ownership on Employee Attitudes , 1992 .

[32]  P. Dewe,et al.  Employee share option schemes why workers are attracted to them , 1988 .

[33]  K. Klein,et al.  Employee stock ownership and employee attitudes: a test of three models. , 1987, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  Bess A. Huey.  New Jersey , 1936 .

[36]  T. Haipeter.  Works councils and profit sharing in the German metalworking industry , 2016 .

[37]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Production Functions : An Application to Labor-Managed Firms and Codetermination , 2015 .

[38]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[39]  T. Steger,et al.  Der Arbeitnehmer im Diskurs der Mitarbeiterkapitalbeteiligung - eine semantische Sekundäranalyse , 2009 .

[40]  R. Schouteten,et al.  Employee Share Schemes in Europe. The Influence of US Multinationals , 2005 .

[41]  Eduard Gaugler.  Die Anfänge der Mitarbeiterbeteiligung im 19. Jahrhundert , 2002 .

[42]  Heinz-J. Bontrup,et al.  Gewinn- und Kapitalbeteiligung , 2002 .

[43]  Markus Scholand.  Mitarbeiterbeteiligung auf neuen Wegen? : moderne Formen der Kapitalbeteiligung von Arbeitnehmern durch Aktien , 2001 .

[44]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  HIGH PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS AND FIRM PERFORMANCE : A SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS , 1998 .

[45]  Odd Nordhaug,et al.  When in Rome, do they do as the Romans? HRM Practices of US Subsidiaries in Europe , 1998 .

[46]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  The Firm as an Incentive System , 1994 .

[47]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF PROCESS AND EFFECTS , 1991 .

[48]  Martin L. Weitzman,et al.  Profit Sharing and Productivity , 1990 .

[49]  A. S. Blinder,et al.  Paying for productivity : a look at the evidence , 1990 .

[50]  M. Poole.  The Impact of Economic Democracy: Profit-sharing and Employee-Shareholding Schemes , 1989 .

[51]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.