Aerodynamic force and flow structures of two airfoils in a tandem configuration in flapping motions are studied, by solving the Navier-Stokes equations in moving overset grids. Three typical phase differences between the fore- and aftairfoil flapping cycles are considered. It is shown that: (1) in the case of no interaction (single airfoil), the time average of the vertical force coefficient over the downstroke is 2.74, which is about 3 times as large as the maximum steady-state lift coefficient of a dragonfly wing; the time average of the horizontal force coefficient is 1.97, which is also large. The reasons for the large force coefficients are the acceleration at the beginning of a stroke, the delayed stall and the “pitching-up” motion near the end of the stroke. (2) In the cases of two-airfoils, the time-variations of the force and moment coefficients on each airfoil are broadly similar to that of the single airfoil in that the vertical force is mainly produced in downstroke and the horizontal force in upstroke, but very large differences exist due to the interaction. (3) For in-phase stroking, the major differences caused by the interaction are that the vertical force on FA in downstroke is increased and the horizontal force on FA in upstroke decreased. As a result, the magnitude of the resultant force is almost unchanged but it inclines less forward. (4) For counter stroking, the major differences are that the vertical force on AA in downstroke and the horizontal force on FA in upstroke are decreased. As a result, the magnitude of the resultant force is decreased by about 20 percent but its direction is almost unchanged. (5) For 90°-phase-difference stroking, the major differences are that the vertical force on AA in downstroke and the horizontal force on FA in upstroke are decreased greatly and the horizontal force on AA in upstroke increased. As a result, the magnitude of the resultant force is decreased by about 28% and it inclines more forward. (6) Among the three cases of phase angles, inphase flapping produces the largest vertical force (also the largest resultant force); the 90°-phase-difference flapping results in the largest horizontal force, but the smallest resultant force.
[1]
Mao Sun,et al.
Aerodynamic forces and flow structures of an airfoil in some unsteady motions at small Reynolds number
,
2000
.
[2]
L. Kovasznay,et al.
Hot-wire investigation of the wake behind cylinders at low Reynolds numbers
,
1949,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
[3]
Marvin Luttges,et al.
Visualization of unsteady separated flow produced by mechanically driven dragonfly wing kinematics model
,
1988
.
[4]
J. Wakeling,et al.
Dragonfly flight. II. Velocities, accelerations and kinematics of flapping flight.
,
1997,
The Journal of experimental biology.
[5]
Mao Sun,et al.
Aerodynamic properties of a wing performing unsteady rotational motions at low Reynolds number
,
2001
.
[6]
C. Somps,et al.
Dragonfly Flight: Novel Uses of Unsteady Separated Flows
,
1985,
Science.
[7]
J. Wakeling,et al.
Dragonfly flight. I. Gliding flight and steady-state aerodynamic forces.
,
1997,
The Journal of experimental biology.
[8]
Marvin Luttges,et al.
Dragonfly unsteady aerodynamics - The role of the wing phase relations in controlling the produced flows
,
1989
.
[9]
Stuart E. Rogers,et al.
Steady and unsteady solutions of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations
,
1991
.
[10]
R. Norberg.
Hovering Flight of the Dragonfly Aeschna Juncea L., Kinematics and Aerodynamics
,
1975
.
[11]
Chunyu Li,et al.
Dynamic stress intensity factor of a functionally graded material under antiplane shear loading
,
2001
.
[12]
R. Meakin.
Moving body overset grid methods for complete aircraft tiltrotor simulations
,
1993
.
[13]
D. E. Alexander.
Unusual Phase Relationships Between The Forewings And Hindwings In Flying Dragonflies
,
1984
.
[14]
Stuart E. Rogers,et al.
Numerical solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Ph.D. Thesis - Stanford Univ., Mar. 1989
,
1990
.
[15]
T. Weis-Fogh.
Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals
,
1973
.