Linking Visual Attention and Number Processing in the Brain: The Role of the Temporo-parietal Junction in Small and Large Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Number Comparison

There exists a long-standing debate regarding whether small and large numerosities engage different networks of processing. The ability to rapidly enumerate small (14) numerosities is referred to as subitizing and is thought to be qualitatively different from large numerosity processing. Functional neuro-imaging studies have attempted to dissociate neural correlates of small and large number processing by contrasting subitizing with counting of numerosities just outside the subitizing range. In the present study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to contrast the processing of numerosities in the subitizing range with numerosities requiring estimation. Participants compared sequentially presented slides of either dots or Arabic numerals for their relative magnitude. We show that comparison of nonsymbolic numerosities in the subitizing range led to activation of the right temporo-parietal junction, while at the same time this region was found to be suppressed during large numerosity processing. Furthermore, relative suppression of this region was strongly associated with faster response times. In previous studies, this region has been implicated in stimulus-driven attention.We therefore contend that activation of the temporo-parietal junction during small number processing and the suppression thereof during large numerosity comparisons reflects differential reliance on stimulus-driven versus goal-directed attentional networks in the brain.

[1]  Fei Xu,et al.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations , 2003, Cognition.

[2]  D. Ansari.  Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  S. Dehaene.  Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[4]  J. Downar,et al.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Neural correlates of symbolic and non-symbolic arithmetic , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[7]  Brian A Wandell,et al.  Visual field map clusters in human cortex , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Arithmetic and the Brain This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cognitive Neuroscience Edited the Intraparietal Sulcus and Number Sense Number Sense in the Animal Brain , 2022 .

[9]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[11]  M. Corbetta,et al.  An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  E. Vogel,et al.  Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex , 2004 .

[14]  J. D. Balakrishnan,et al.  Is subitizing a unique numerical ability? , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Soon Chun Siong,et al.  Parametric effects of numerical distance on the intraparietal sulcus during passive viewing of rapid numerosity changes , 2006, Brain Research.

[16]  Fei Xu,et al.  Number sense in human infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[17]  R. Marois,et al.  Capacity limits of information processing in the brain , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Are Subitizing and Counting Implemented as Separate or Functionally Overlapping Processes? , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[20]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Estimating receptive field size from fMRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[22]  Jin Fan,et al.  The activation of attentional networks , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Laure Zago,et al.  How verbal and spatial manipulation networks contribute to calculation: An fMRI study , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Quantitative analysis of attention and detection signals during visual search. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[28]  J. Gore,et al.  A Stimulus-Driven Approach to Object Identity and Location Processing in the Human Brain , 2000, Neuron.

[29]  J. Downar,et al.  A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  R. Marois,et al.  Visual Short-Term Memory Load Suppresses Temporo-Parietal Junction Activity and Induces Inattentional Blindness , 2005, Psychological science.

[32]  E. J. Carter,et al.  Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children , 2006, PLoS biology.

[33]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[34]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[38]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[39]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Visuospatial reorienting signals in the human temporo‐parietal junction are independent of response selection , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[40]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Neural Evidence Linking Visual Object Enumeration and Attention , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.