THE BENEFITS OF NON-RADIAL VS. RADIAL SUPER-EFFICIENCY DEA: AN APPLICATION TO BURDEN-SHARING AMONGST NATO MEMBER NATIONS

Abstract Using radial super-efficiency data envelopment analysis (DEA) has improved the discriminating performance across efficient decision-making units (DMUs). This paper extends the super-efficiency approach to a non-radial super-efficiency DEA (NRSE-DEA) index. NRSE-DEA is shown to be invariant to units of input (output) measurement. NRSE-DEA is illustrated here via an application to NATO burden-sharing assessment in which the DMUs are the member nations of NATO. The NRSE-DEA provides additional insights into the ranking of efficient countries, suggesting which are absorbing a particularly large share of NATO responsibilities. The NRSE-DEA generates a smaller set of efficient DMUs. This, in turn, provides more discriminatory power, a more accurate measure of super-efficiency, a more meaningful ranking of the efficient burden sharing countries, and a more reliable assessment of contributions by NATO members, amongst other policy issues.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[2]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  John J. Rousseau,et al.  Two-person ratio efficiency games , 1995 .

[4]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .

[5]  Linda Hendry,et al.  Using DEA to assess NATO burden-sharing , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  Importance for DEA of zeros in data, multipliers, and solutions , 1993 .

[7]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  INFEASIBILITY OF SUPER EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS , 1999 .

[8]  A. Charnes,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF EFFICIENCY CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE ADDITIVE MODEL OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[9]  A. Charnes,et al.  A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiency and inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[10]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[11]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming , 1989 .

[12]  Paul W. Wilson,et al.  Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis , 1995 .

[13]  William W. Cooper,et al.  EXTENSIONS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN DEA , 1996 .

[14]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[15]  Joe Zhu Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure , 1996 .

[16]  Robert M. Thrall,et al.  Chapter 5 Duality, classification and slacks in DEA , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[17]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Chapter 1 Introduction: Extensions and new developments in DEA , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..