Cognition and hearing aids.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Ma,et al. A detection theory account of change detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.
[2] D. Schum,et al. Actual and predicted word-recognition performance of elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[3] HamacherV.,et al. Signal processing in high-end hearing aids , 2005 .
[4] A. Kramer,et al. Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress , 1990, Multiple-task performance.
[5] Robert C. Bilger,et al. Standardization of a Test of Speech Perception in Noise , 1984 .
[6] DeLiang Wang,et al. Time-Frequency Masking for Speech Separation and Its Potential for Hearing Aid Design , 2008 .
[7] T. Lunner,et al. Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing-aid users , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[8] Rainer Martin,et al. SPEECH ENHANCEMENT IN THE DFT DOMAIN USING LAPLACIAN SPEECH PRIORS , 2003 .
[9] Todd A Ricketts,et al. Directional hearing aids: then and now. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[10] Brian C J Moore,et al. Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] Donald J. Schum,et al. Noise‐reduction circuitry in hearing aids: (2) Goals and current strategies , 2003 .
[12] K E Spens,et al. Cognitive correlates of visual speech understanding in hearing-impaired individuals. , 2001, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.
[13] DeLiang Wang,et al. On Ideal Binary Mask As the Computational Goal of Auditory Scene Analysis , 2005, Speech Separation by Humans and Machines.
[14] Sridhar Kalluri,et al. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[15] Thomas Lunner,et al. Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[16] T Lunner,et al. A Digital Filterbank Hearing Aid: Three Digital Signal Processing Algorithms‐User Preference and Performance , 1997, Ear and hearing.
[17] Henning Puder,et al. Signal Processing in High-End Hearing Aids: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Trends , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..
[18] Rainer Martin,et al. Noise power spectral density estimation based on optimal smoothing and minimum statistics , 2001, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..
[19] R. Plomp. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids , 1977 .
[20] J. Rönnberg. Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: a framework and a model , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[21] Graham Naylor,et al. Long-term signal-to-noise ratio at the input and output of amplitude-compression systems. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[22] R. Engle,et al. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[23] Lauren Calandruccio,et al. Determination of the Potential Benefit of Time-Frequency Gain Manipulation , 2006, Ear and hearing.
[24] David Malah,et al. Speech enhancement using a minimum mean-square error log-spectral amplitude estimator , 1984, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..
[25] Yoshihisa Ishida,et al. Musical noise reduction using an adaptive filter , 2003 .
[26] Graham Naylor,et al. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 1. Patterns of benefit , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[27] L. F. Barrett,et al. Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.
[28] A. Miyake,et al. Models of Working Memory , 1997 .
[29] N. Cowan. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[30] M. Daneman,et al. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Selective Attention in Normal and Impaired Hearing , 2008, Trends in amplification.
[32] Jerker Rönnberg,et al. Cognitive and communicative function : The effects of chronological age and "handicap age" , 1990 .
[33] A. Baddeley. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[34] H Dillon. Tutorial Compression? Yes, But for Low or High Frequencies, for Low or High Intensities, and with What Response Times? , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[35] P. Carpenter,et al. Individual Differences in Integrating Information between and within Sentences. , 1983 .
[36] Marc Moonen,et al. The effect of multimicrophone noise reduction systems on sound source localization by users of binaural hearing aids. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] P. Rabbitt,et al. Channel-Capacity, Intelligibility and Immediate Memory , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[38] B. Shinn-Cunningham. Object-based auditory and visual attention , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[39] P. Rabbitt. Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.
[40] King Chung,et al. Challenges and Recent Developments in Hearing Aids: Part I. Speech Understanding in Noise, Microphone Technologies and Noise Reduction Algorithms , 2004, Trends in amplification.
[41] Susan Kemper,et al. The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise. , 2003, Psychology and aging.
[42] Thomas Lunner,et al. Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[43] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Hearing Loss and Perceptual Effort: Downstream Effects on Older Adults’ Memory for Speech , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[44] M. Davies,et al. Endovascular treatment of tracheoinnominate artery fistula: a case report. , 2006, Vascular and endovascular surgery.
[45] S. Phillips,et al. Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[46] M. Daneman,et al. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[47] Brian C J Moore,et al. Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[48] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Spoken Language Comprehension in Older Adults: Interactions between Sensory and Cognitive Change in Normal Aging , 2001 .
[49] Sridhar Kalluri,et al. Cognitive effects of noise reduction strategies , 2006 .
[50] Misha Pavel,et al. Channel Selection and Feature Projection for Cognitive Load Estimation Using Ambulatory EEG , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..
[51] Daphne N. Yu,et al. High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.
[52] A Wingfield,et al. One voice too many: adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.
[53] M. Boxtel,et al. Mild Hearing Impairment Can Reduce Verbal Memory Performance in a Healthy Adult Population , 2000, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.
[54] Graham Naylor,et al. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 2. Patterns of candidature , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[55] Graham Naylor,et al. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[56] R. Plomp. Noise, Amplification, and Compression: Considerations of Three Main Issues in Hearing Aid Design , 1994, Ear and hearing.
[57] B C Moore,et al. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids. , 1988, British journal of audiology.
[58] DeLiang Wang,et al. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[59] M. Just,et al. From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .
[60] L Magnusson,et al. Predicted and Measured Speech Recognition Performance in Noise with Linear Amplification , 2001, Ear and hearing.
[61] B Hagerman,et al. Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. , 1995, Scandinavian audiology.
[62] Thomas Lunner,et al. Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[63] T. Lunner,et al. Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU) , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[64] F. Craik. The role of cognition in age-related hearing loss. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[65] M. Akeroyd. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[66] J. Dubno,et al. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.