Validation of the flash-evoked response from fetal MEG

Flash-evoked responses can be recorded from the fetus in utero. However, a standard analysis approach based on orthogonal projection (OP) to attenuate maternal and fetal cardiac signals leads to a spatial redistribution of the signal. This effect prevents the correlation of source location with a known fetal head location in some cases and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is sometimes limited such that the response latency is difficult to determine. We used a modified beamformer model search analysis to avoid the redistribution shortcoming and to improve the SNR. We included a statistical test for residual interference in the average and quantified significance of the evoked response with a bootstrap method. Selected source locations compared favorably to fetal head locations estimated from ultrasound exams. The evoked response time course was found to have a significant post-trigger peak with a latency between about 180 and 770 ms in more than 90% of the subject measurements. These results confirm that the combined application of a beamformer model search and bootstrap significance test provides a validation of the flash-evoked response observed in OP processed fetal MEG channels.

[1]  F. Morrell,et al.  Developmental study of photic evoked responses in premature infants. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  S. Andersson,et al.  Functional development of the visual system in normal and protein-deprived rats. IV. Latencies in the specific visual pathway of adult rats. , 1987, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[3]  Reginald G. Bickford,et al.  Atlas of Neonatal Electroencephalography , 1992 .

[4]  Hui Zhao,et al.  Simultaneity of foetal heart rate acceleration and foetal trunk movement determined by foetal magnetocardiogram actocardiography. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  H. Preissl,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic recordings of visual evoked brain activity in the human fetus , 2002, The Lancet.

[6]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Fetal MEG redistribution by projection operators , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Robinson Se,et al.  Localization of event-related activity by SAM(erf). , 2004 .

[8]  Hari Eswaran,et al.  Spontaneous neuronal activity in fetuses and newborns , 2004, Experimental Neurology.

[9]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Functional development of the visual system in human fetus using magnetoencephalography , 2004, Experimental Neurology.

[10]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Optimal reduction of MCG in fetal MEG recordings , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Minna Huotilainen,et al.  Magnetoencephalography of the newborn brain. , 2006, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[12]  Elizabeth W. Pang,et al.  Event-related beamforming: A robust method for presurgical functional mapping using MEG , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Improved flash evoked response from fetal MEG , 2007 .

[14]  H. Preissl,et al.  Searching for the best model: ambiguity of inverse solutions and application to fetal magnetoencephalography , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  H. Preissl,et al.  Bootstrap significance of low SNR evoked response , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.