PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTIONARY CORRELATION USING LIKELIHOOD

Many evolutionary processes can lead to a change in the correlation between continuous characters over time or on different branches of a phylogenetic tree. Shifts in genetic or functional constraint, in the selective regime, or in some combination thereof can influence both the evolution of continuous traits and their relation to each other. These changes can often be mapped on a phylogenetic tree to examine their influence on multivariate phenotypic diversification. We propose a new likelihood method to fit multiple evolutionary rate matrices (also called evolutionary variance–covariance matrices) to species data for two or more continuous characters and a phylogeny. The evolutionary rate matrix is a matrix containing the evolutionary rates for individual characters on its diagonal, and the covariances between characters (of which the evolutionary correlations are a function) elsewhere. To illustrate our approach, we apply the method to an empirical dataset consisting of two features of feeding morphology sampled from 28 centrarchid fish species, as well as to data generated via phylogenetic numerical simulations. We find that the method has appropriate type I error, power, and parameter estimation. The approach presented herein is the first to allow for the explicit testing of how and when the evolutionary covariances between characters have changed in the history of a group.

[1]  Liam J. Revell,et al.  PCCA: a program for phylogenetic canonical correlation analysis , 2008, Bioinform..

[2]  Karel F. Liem,et al.  Evolutionary Strategies and Morphological Innovations: Cichlid Pharyngeal Jaws , 1973 .

[3]  M. Pagel Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution , 1999, Nature.

[4]  D. Bolnick,et al.  FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS AND MOLECULAR DIVERGENCE TIME ESTIMATES IN CENTRARCHID FISHES (TELEOSTEI: CENTRARCHIDAE) , 2005 .

[5]  L. Revell On the Analysis of Evolutionary Change along Single Branches in a Phylogeny , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[6]  D. Roff,et al.  FROM MICRO‐ TO MACROEVOLUTION THROUGH QUANTITATIVE GENETIC VARIATION: POSITIVE EVIDENCE FROM FIELD CRICKETS , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  B. Flury Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models , 1988 .

[8]  C. D. Hulsey,et al.  MICRO‐ AND MACROEVOLUTIONARY DECOUPLING OF CICHLID JAWS: A TEST OF LIEM'S KEY INNOVATION HYPOTHESIS , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  Jeffrey A. Walker,et al.  A general model of functional constraints on phenotypic evolution. , 2007, The American naturalist.

[10]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  TRANSLATING BETWEEN MICROEVOLUTIONARY PROCESS AND MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS: THE CORRELATION STRUCTURE OF INTERSPECIFIC DATA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  J. Hunter Key innovations and the ecology of macroevolution. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  F J Rohlf,et al.  COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS VARIABLES: GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  HIERARCHICAL COMPARISON OF GENETIC VARIANCE‐COVARIANCE MATRICES. I. USING THE FLURY HIERARCHY , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[15]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Comparative analyses of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirds , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  D. Collar,et al.  Integrated diversification of locomotion and feeding in labrid fishes , 2008, Biology Letters.

[17]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[18]  A. Grafen The phylogenetic regression. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  MIPoD: A Hypothesis‐Testing Framework for Microevolutionary Inference from Patterns of Divergence , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[20]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific Data , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[21]  Jonathan P. Bollback,et al.  Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[22]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[23]  D. Schluter Character Displacement and the Adaptive Divergence of Finches on Islands and Continents , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Using the Past to Predict the Present: Confidence Intervals for Regression Equations in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[25]  R. Lande QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  Emília P. Martins,et al.  Estimating the Rate of Phenotypic Evolution from Comparative Data , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[27]  D. Collar,et al.  COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: DOES DISPARITY ACCUMULATE AT THE SAME RATE IN TWO LINEAGES OF CENTRARCHID FISHES? , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  K. Dial Avian Flight , 2006 .

[29]  P. Grant Convergent and divergent character displacement , 1972 .

[30]  L. Revell,et al.  Testing quantitative genetic hypotheses about the evolutionary rate matrix for continuous characters , 2008 .

[31]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and quantitative characters , 1988 .

[32]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  STABILITY OF THE G‐MATRIX IN A POPULATION EXPERIENCING PLEIOTROPIC MUTATION, STABILIZING SELECTION, AND GENETIC DRIFT , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Form and function: structural analysis in evolutionary morphology , 1981, Paleobiology.

[34]  Jonathan P. Bollback,et al.  SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[35]  G. Vermeij Adaptation, Versatility, and Evolution , 1973 .

[36]  T. Jahn,et al.  SUSPENSION FEEDING BY MARINE INVERTEBRATE LARVAE: CLEARANCE OF PARTICLES BY CILIATED BANDS OF A ROTIFER, PLUTEUS, AND TROCHOPHORE , 1972 .

[37]  L. Revell THE G MATRIX UNDER FLUCTUATING CORRELATIONAL MUTATION AND SELECTION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  B. Walsh,et al.  Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics , 2019, Handbook of Statistical Genomics.

[39]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation , 1993 .

[40]  F. Galis 25 – Key Innovations and Radiations , 2001 .

[41]  Karel F. Liem,et al.  Functional Anatomy of the Vertebrates: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1994 .

[42]  S. Gatesy,et al.  LOCOMOTOR MODULES AND THE EVOLUTION OF AVIAN FLIGHT , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  P. Phillips,et al.  Comparative quantitative genetics : evolution of the G matrix , 2002 .

[44]  A. M. Carroll,et al.  Morphology predicts suction feeding performance in centrarchid fishes , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[45]  M. Pagel,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis and Comparative Data: A Test and Review of Evidence , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[46]  M. Whitlock,et al.  PERSISTENCE OF CHANGES IN THE GENETIC COVARIANCE MATRIX AFTER A BOTTLENECK , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[48]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  TESTING FOR DIFFERENT RATES OF CONTINUOUS TRAIT EVOLUTION USING LIKELIHOOD , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[50]  D. Stock The genetic basis of modularity in the development and evolution of the vertebrate dentition. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[51]  D. Collar,et al.  DISCORDANCE BETWEEN MORPHOLOGICAL AND MECHANICAL DIVERSITY IN THE FEEDING MECHANISM OF CENTRARCHID FISHES , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[52]  J. Felsenstein Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. , 1973, American journal of human genetics.

[53]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution , 2004, Genetica.

[54]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[55]  D. Bolnick,et al.  FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS AND MOLECULAR DIVERGENCE TIME ESTIMATES IN CENTRARCHID FISHES (TELEOSTEI: CENTRARCHIDAE) , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[56]  Reinhard Bürger,et al.  THE MUTATION MATRIX AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.