The long-term outcome of head injury: implications for service planning.

As most of those experiencing traumatic brain injury tend to be young, disabled survivors will be gradually accruing in each locality as each year passes. How many need continuing care a decade after injury? How many need day care, or need help with finding work, or continuing support for carers? 190 patients who had been admitted to two UK regional neurosurgical units on average some 7 years earlier were followed up. With an average age of 29 years these patients stayed in hospital for an average 33 days. At follow-up 23% were classified as having moderate disability or worse on the Glasgow Outcome Scale, including 7.4% who had died subsequent to discharge. Survivors were given a neuropsychological assessment and a socioeconomic interview. Of the survivors, 17% had failed to make a good recovery, but 36% were failing to occupy their time in a meaningful way. Age over 30 at time of injury, not occupied before injury, and above-average length of stay were some of the predictors for failing to occupy time. Quality of life was severely curtailed for those who could not occupy their time, as was the case for their carers. Appropriate counselling, vocational evaluation and family support in the early years following injury may help to improve quality of life for both the head-injured person and their carers.

[1]  W. Schalén,et al.  Economic aspects of capacity for work after severe traumatic brain lesions. , 1994, Brain injury.

[2]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Head injury in children. , 1991, Brain injury.

[3]  黛 道子,et al.  Caring for People , 1990 .

[4]  T. McMillan,et al.  Services for severely head-injured patients in north London and environs. , 1990, Brain injury.

[5]  S. Wilkinson,et al.  Survey of severely head-injured people in the Southampton health district , 1989 .

[6]  P. London A Long Look at Head Injuries , 1989 .

[7]  G. Kinsella,et al.  Survival of social relationships following head injury. , 1989, International disability studies.

[8]  P. Wehman,et al.  Supported employment and compensatory strategies for enhancing vocational outcome following traumatic brain injury. , 1991, Brain injury.

[9]  A. Gatherer,et al.  Facilities for rehabilitation of adults after head injury , 1988 .

[10]  J. Gleave,et al.  Counting the people disabled by head injury. , 1987, Injury.

[11]  Z. Groswasser,et al.  Survivors of severe traumatic brain injury in childhood. II. Late residual disability. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[12]  W. Lewin,et al.  Long-term outcome after severe head injury. , 1979, British medical journal.

[13]  M. Oddy,et al.  Subjective impairment and social recovery after closed head injury. , 1978, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  B. Jennett,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale , 1975, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Irving,et al.  SEVERE HEAD INJURIES , 1967 .

[16]  M. Irving,et al.  SEVERE HEAD INJURIES: A Six-year Follow-up , 1967 .