The anatomy of cultural omnivorousness: The case of the United Kingdom

Abstract The cultural omnivore debate is central to the understanding of contemporary cultural inequality. This paper offers some new evidence about Britain, some methodological clarification regarding the consequences of using different measures of omnivorousness and some considerations about its role in cultural reproduction. High quality data from a survey of the UK in 2003–2004 provide relevant evidence about participation and taste across several cultural domains. We identify omnivorousness in terms of both volume and composition of preferences. Socio-demographic factors affecting omnivore volume are broadly similar, but not identical, to those reported for other countries. Concerning the composition of preferences, and conscious of the controversies about the dissolution of cultural hierarchy, we apply a new procedure for a tripartite classification of tastes and practices as legitimate, common and unauthorised. Bundles of preferences are examined. We conclude that there is a section of the population whose preferences span the categories of the legitimate, the common and the unauthorised, but that the most omnivorous portion of the population, and also the highest social class, disproportionately embrace legitimate items, suggesting that an omnivorous orientation is a mark of cultural capital.

[1]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Disentangling Effacement, Omnivore, and Distinction Effects on the Consumption of Cultural Activities: An Illustration , 2002 .

[2]  Bethany Bryson,et al.  Anything but heavy metal : Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes , 1996 .

[3]  Daniel A. Powers,et al.  Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis , 1999 .

[4]  Nancy Krieger,et al.  A Researcher's Guide to the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification , 2003 .

[5]  U. Beck,et al.  Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences , 2001 .

[6]  Guy Bellavance,et al.  Le goût des autres : Une analyse des répertoires culturels de nouvelles élites omnivores : Goût, pratiques culturelles et intégalités sociales : branchés et exclus , 2004 .

[7]  John Sonnett.  Musical boundaries: intersections of form and content , 2004 .

[8]  Jordi Lopez Sintas,et al.  Omnivores Show up Again: The Segmentation of Cultural Consumers in Spanish Social Space , 2002 .

[9]  D. Holt.  Distinction in America? Recovering Bourdieu's theory of tastes from its critics , 1997 .

[10]  A. Warde,et al.  Expanding Tastes? Cultural Omnivorousness & Social Change in the Uk , 2000 .

[11]  M. Savage,et al.  Class and Cultural Division in the UK , 2008 .

[12]  G. Bellavance.  Where's high? Who's low? What's new? Classification and stratification inside cultural “Repertoires” , 2008 .

[13]  T. Bevers.  Cultural education and the canon: A comparative analysis of the content of secondary school exams for music and art in England, France, Germany, and the Netherlands, 1990–2004 , 2005 .

[14]  Michèle Lamont,et al.  Cultivating differences : symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality , 1993 .

[15]  Erik Bihagen,et al.  Culture consumption in Sweden: The stability of gender differences , 2000 .

[16]  B. Erickson.  Culture, Class, and Connections , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Philippe Coulangeon.  La stratification sociale des goûts musicaux : Le modèle de la légitimité culturelle en question , 2003 .

[18]  M. Savage,et al.  Culture, Class, Distinction , 2009 .

[19]  Philippe Coulangeon.  La stratification sociale des goûts musicaux: Le modèle de la légitimité culturelle en question@@@La stratification sociale des gouts musicaux: Le modele de la legitimite culturelle en question , 2003 .

[20]  Tally Katz‐Gerro,et al.  Cultural Consumption and Social Stratification: Leisure Activities, Musical Tastes, and Social Location , 1999 .

[21]  Richard A. Peterson,et al.  Problems in comparative research: The example of omnivorousness , 2005 .

[22]  Shin-Kap Han,et al.  Unraveling the Brow: What and How of Choice in Musical Preference , 2003 .

[23]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  The rules of art : genesis and structure of the literary field , 1997 .

[24]  A. Warde.  Does taste still serve power , 2008 .

[25]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  The Field of Cultural Production , 1993 .

[26]  Koen van Eijck,et al.  Social Differentiation in Musical Taste Patterns , 2001 .

[27]  M. Waters,et al.  The death of class , 1996 .

[28]  Philippe Coulangeon.  La stratification sociale des goûts musicaux , 2003 .

[29]  Tally Katz-Gerro,et al.  Highbrow Cultural Consumption and Class Distinction in Italy, Israel, West Germany, Sweden, and the United States , 2002 .

[30]  Richard A. Peterson,et al.  The rise and fall of highbrow snobbery as a status marker , 1997 .

[31]  Omar Lizardo,et al.  The puzzle of women's “highbrow” culture consumption: Integrating gender and work into Bourdieu's class theory of taste , 2006 .

[32]  M. Ollivier,et al.  Ouverture ostentatoire à la diversité et cosmopolitisme : Vers une nouvelle configuration discursive ? , 2004 .

[33]  A. Giddens.  Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[34]  Jordi Lopez Sintas,et al.  Omnivore versus univore consumption and its symbolic properties: evidence from Spaniards performing , 2004 .

[35]  M. Ollivier.  Modes of openness to cultural diversity: Humanist, populist, practical, and indifferent , 2008 .

[36]  R. Peterson.  Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore , 1992 .

[37]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-century Boston: the creation of an organizational base for high culture in America , 1982 .

[38]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Arts participation as cultural capital in the United States, 1982–2002: Signs of decline? , 2004 .

[39]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[40]  K. Eijck.  Richard A. Peterson and the culture of consumption , 2000 .

[41]  K. Eijck,et al.  The changing impact of social background on lifestyle: “culturalization” instead of individualization? , 2004 .

[42]  Bethany Bryson,et al.  What about the univores? Musical dislikes and group-based identity construction among Americans with low levels of education , 1997 .

[43]  D. Kane.  A network approach to the puzzle of women's cultural participation , 2004 .

[44]  R. Peterson,et al.  CHANGING HIGHBROW TASTE: FROM SNOB TO OMNIVORE* , 1996 .

[45]  J. Goldthorpe,et al.  Social Stratification and Cultural Consumption: Music in England , 2006 .

[46]  A. Warde,et al.  The omnivorous orientation in the UK , 2008 .

[47]  Yannick Lemel,et al.  Is ‘distinction’ really outdated? Questioning the meaning of the omnivorization of musical taste in contemporary France , 2007 .

[48]  O. Donnat.  Les français face à la culture : de l'exclusion à l'éclectisme , 1994 .

[49]  J. López-Sintas,et al.  From exclusive to inclusive elitists and further: Twenty years of omnivorousness and cultural diversity in arts participation in the USA , 2005 .