Spatial perception changes associated with space flight: implications for adaptation to altered inertial environments.

Preparation for extended travel by astronauts within the Solar System, including a possible manned mission to Mars, requires more complete understanding of adaptation to altered inertial environments. Improved understanding is needed to support development and evaluation of interventions to facilitate adaptations during transitions between those environments. Travel to another planet escalates the adaptive challenge because astronauts will experience prolonged exposure to microgravity before encountering a novel gravitational environment. This challenge would have to be met without ground support at the landing site. Evaluation of current adaptive status as well as intervention efficacy can be performed using perceptual, eye movement and postural measures. Due to discrepancies of adaptation magnitude and time-course among these measures, complete understanding of adaptation processes, as well as intervention evaluation, requires examination of all three. Previous research and theory that provide models for comprehending adaptation to altered inertial environments are briefly examined. Reports from astronauts of selected pre- in- and postflight self-motion illusions are described. The currently controversial tilt-translation reinterpretation hypothesis is reviewed and possible resolutions to the controversy are proposed. Finally, based on apparent gaps in our current knowledge, further research is proposed to achieve a more complete understanding of adaptation as well as to develop effective counter-measures.

[1]  D L Harm,et al.  Self-motion perception: assessment by computer-generated animations. , 1998, Acta astronautica.

[2]  C M Oman,et al.  Visually induced self-motion sensation adapts rapidly to left-right visual reversal. , 1980, Science.

[3]  R M Steinman,et al.  Compensatory eye movements during active and passive head movements: fast adaptation to changes in visual magnification. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  H. Helson Adaptation-level theory : an experimental and systematic approach to behavior , 1964 .

[5]  Richard S. Johnston,et al.  Biomedical Results of APOLLO. NASA SP-368 , 1975 .

[6]  L R Young,et al.  Spatial orientation in weightlessness and readaptation to earth's gravity. , 1984, Science.

[7]  I. Howard,et al.  Human Spatial Orientation , 1966 .

[8]  V Henn,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction in motion perception and the generation of nystagmus. , 1980, Neurosciences Research Program bulletin.

[9]  T A Furness,et al.  The use of an independent visual background to reduce simulator side-effects. , 1999, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[10]  Jerrold Prothero,et al.  A Unified Approach to Presence and Motion Sickness , 2003 .

[11]  Ernst Mach,et al.  Grundlinien der Lehre von den Bewegungsempfindungen , 1967 .

[12]  W. Bruzek,et al.  European vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 5. Contribution of the otoliths to the vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  Basic solutions to the problem of head-centric visual localization , 1990 .

[14]  F. Guedry Psychophysics of Vestibular Sensation , 1974 .

[15]  G D Paige,et al.  Characteristics of the VOR in Response to Linear Acceleration , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  D. Parker,et al.  The vestibular apparatus. , 1980, Scientific American.

[17]  Donald E. Parker,et al.  Inertial acceleration as a measure of linear vection: An alternative to magnitude estimation , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[19]  R J Peterka,et al.  Relation between perception of vertical axis rotation and vestibulo-ocular reflex symmetry. , 1992, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[20]  C. Oman,et al.  Horizontal angular VOR, nystagmus dumping, and sensation duration in spacelab SLS-1 crewmembers. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[21]  R. Held,et al.  Adaptation of Disarranged Hand-Eye Coordination Contingent upon Re-Afferent Stimulation , 1958 .

[22]  M F Reschke,et al.  Otolith tilt-translation reinterpretation following prolonged weightlessness: implications for preflight training. , 1985, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[23]  Millard F Reschke,et al.  Relationship between selected orientation rest frame, circular vection and space motion sickness , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[24]  Norbert Bischof,et al.  Optic-Vestibular Orientation to the Vertical , 1974 .

[25]  J H Milsum,et al.  Spatial and dynamic aspects of visual fixation. , 1965, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[26]  M F Reschke,et al.  Effects of prolonged weightlessness on self-motion perception and eye movements evoked by roll and pitch. , 1987, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[27]  Theodore Raphan,et al.  Ocular counterrolling induced by centrifugation during orbital space flight , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[29]  V. Henn,et al.  The velocity response of vestibular nucleus neurons during vestibular, visual, and combined angular acceleration , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  B. Cohen,et al.  Perception of tilt (somatogravic illusion) in response to sustained linear acceleration during space flight , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  B Bridgeman,et al.  Dual adaptation and adaptive generalization of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  B J Hess,et al.  Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  R L Tubbs,et al.  A temporary threshold shift for self-motion detection following sustained, oscillating linear acceleration , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Scott J. Wood,et al.  Human otolith–ocular reflexes during off-vertical axis rotation: effect of frequency on tilt–translation ambiguity and motion sickness , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[35]  Daniel M Merfeld,et al.  Rotation otolith tilt-translation reinterpretation (ROTTR) hypothesis: a new hypothesis to explain neurovestibular spaceflight adaptation. , 2003, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[36]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Handbook of experimental psychology , 1951 .

[37]  D E Parker,et al.  Self-motion perception: assessment by real-time computer-generated animations. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[38]  M F Reschke,et al.  Vestibular ataxia following shuttle flights: effects of microgravity on otolith-mediated sensorimotor control of posture. , 1993, The American journal of otology.

[39]  D E Parker,et al.  Human Vestibular Function and Weightlessness , 1991, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[40]  J. M. Rolfe,et al.  Flight simulation , 1988 .

[41]  R. Mayne,et al.  A Systems Concept of the Vestibular Organs , 1974 .

[42]  D L Harm,et al.  Perceived self-orientation and self-motion in microgravity, after landing and during preflight adaptation training. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[43]  Constantine H. Houpis,et al.  Feedback Control System Analysis and Synthesis , 1966 .

[44]  M. F. Reschke,et al.  The effects of prolonged exposure to weightlessness on postural equilibrium , 1977 .

[45]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  “Conflicting” Motion Cues to the Visual and Vestibular Self- Motion Systems Around 0.06 Hz Evoke Simulator Sickness , 2004, Hum. Factors.