Quantum model for psychological measurements: from the projection postulate to interference of mental observables represented as positive operator valued measures

Recently foundational issues of applicability of the formalism of quantum mechanics (QM) to cognitive psychology, decision making, and psychophysics attracted a lot of interest. In particular, in \cite{DKBB} the possibility to use of the projection postulate and representation of "mental observables" by Hermitian operators was discussed in very detail. The main conclusion of the recent discussions on the foundations of "quantum(-like) cognitive psychology" is that one has to be careful in determination of conditions of applicability of the projection postulate as a mathematical tool for description of measurements of observables represented by Hermitian operators. To represent some statistical experimental data (both physical and mental) in the quantum(-like) way, one has to use generalized quantum observables given by positive operator-valued measures (POVMs). This paper contains a brief review on POVMs which can be useful for newcomers to the field of quantum(-like) studies. Especially interesting for cognitive psychology is a variant of the formula of total probability (FTP) with the interference term derived for incompatible observables given by POVMs. We present an interpretation of the interference term from the psychological viewpoint. As was shown before, the appearance of such a term (perturbing classical FTP) plays the important role in cognitive psychology, e.g., recognition of ambiguous figures and the disjunction effect. The interference term for observables given by POVMs has much more complicated structure than the corresponding term for observables given by Hermitian operators. We elaborate cognitive interpretations of different components of the POVMs-interference term and apply our analysis to a quantum(-like) model of decision making.

[1]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum-like brain: "Interference of minds". , 2006, Bio Systems.

[2]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  EPR "paradox", projection postulate, time synchronization "nonlocality" , 2009 .

[3]  Zheng Wang,et al.  Quantum Information Processing Explanation for Interactions between Inferences and Decisions , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Quantum Interaction.

[4]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Quantum Entanglement and the Issue of Selective Influences in Psychology: An Overview , 2012, QI.

[5]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  On Relations Between Probabilities Under Quantum and Classical Measurements , 2002 .

[6]  D. A. Edwards The mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics , 1979, Synthese.

[7]  Leslie E Ballentine,et al.  Limitations of the projection postulate , 1990 .

[8]  N. David Mermin,et al.  Boojums All The Way Through , 1990 .

[9]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Quantum dynamics of human decision-making , 2006 .

[10]  Andrei Khrennikov Quantum-like formalism for cognitive measurements. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[11]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  ON A QUANTUM MODEL OF THE RECOGNITION PROCESS , 2008 .

[12]  Greg Parker,et al.  The EPR paradox , 1995 .

[13]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  The problem of quantum-like representation in economy, cognitive science, and genetics , 2009 .

[14]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum-like model of diauxie in Escherichia coli: operational description of precultivation effect. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum-Like Model for Decision Making Process in Two Players Game , 2011 .

[16]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Markov and Quantum models of decision-making , 2009 .

[17]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[18]  Jennifer S Trueblood,et al.  A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. , 2011, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Neumann Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 1955 .

[20]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[22]  Taksu Cheon,et al.  Interference and inequality in quantum decision theory , 2010, 1008.2628.

[23]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Marian Grabowski,et al.  Operational Quantum Physics , 2001 .

[25]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Quantum Information Processing Explanation of Disjunction Effects , 2006 .

[26]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum-like interference effect in gene expression: glucose-lactose destructive interference , 2011, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[27]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Social Science , 2013 .

[28]  G. Carpenter,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 1999 .

[29]  M. Ohya,et al.  Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Information and Computation and Its Applications to Nano- and Bio-systems , 2011 .

[30]  W. D. Muynck Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, an Empiricist Approach , 2002 .

[31]  Janne Kujala,et al.  Probability, Random Variables, and Selectivity , 2013, 1312.2239.

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Disjunction Effect in Choice under Uncertainty , 1992 .

[33]  Joseph P. Zbilut,et al.  Some remarks on an experiment suggesting quantum-like behavior of cognitive entities and formulation of an abstract quantum mechanical formalism to describe cognitive entity and its dynamics , 2007 .

[34]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum-like dynamics of decision-making in prisoner's dilemma game , 2012 .

[35]  Michael Barr,et al.  The Emperor's New Mind , 1989 .

[36]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum-like model of cognitive decision making and information processing , 2009, Biosyst..

[37]  R. Feynman,et al.  Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , 1965 .

[38]  R. Penrose,et al.  Shadows of the Mind , 1994 .

[39]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum-like model of brain's functioning: decision making from decoherence. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Mental States Follow Quantum Mechanics During Perception and Cognition of Ambiguous Figures , 2009, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[41]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Quantum mechanics, interference, and the brain , 2009 .

[42]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  On Quantum-Like Probabilistic Structure of Mental Information , 2004, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[43]  Stuart R. Hameroff,et al.  QUANTUM COHERENCE IN MICROTUBULES: A NEURAL BASIS FOR EMERGENT CONSCIOUSNESS? 1 , 1994 .

[44]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  On Application of Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad Equation in Cognitive Psychology , 2011, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[45]  Dugald Murdoch,et al.  The Philosophical Writings , 1986 .

[46]  Andrei Khrennikov The quantum-like brain on the cognitive and subcognitive time scales , 2008 .

[47]  Joseph P. Zbilut,et al.  A Preliminary Experimental Verification On the Possibility of Bell Inequality Violation in Mental States , 2008 .

[48]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Observables Generalizing Positive Operator Valued Measures , 2012 .

[49]  S. Hameroff Quantum computation in brain microtubules? The Penrose-Hameroff 'Orch OR' model of consciousness , 1998 .

[50]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Dynamics of Entropy in Quantum-like Model of Decision Making. , 2011 .

[51]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Quantum mechanics and violations of the sure-thing principle: The use of probability interference and other concepts , 2009 .

[52]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum-like dynamics of decision-making , 2012 .

[53]  Sunny Y. Auyang,et al.  How Is Quantum Field Theory Possible , 1995 .

[54]  Jennifer S Trueblood,et al.  A quantum geometric model of similarity. , 2013, Psychological review.

[55]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum Markov Model for Data from Shafir-Tversky Experiments in Cognitive Psychology , 2009, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[56]  Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano,et al.  Operational Axioms for Quantum Mechanics , 2006, quant-ph/0611094.

[57]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Quantum Models for Psychological Measurements: An Unsolved Problem , 2014, PloS one.

[58]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  On Selective Influences, Marginal Selectivity, and Bell/CHSH Inequalities , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[59]  I. M. Gelfand,et al.  On the embedding of normed rings into the ring of operators in Hilbert space , 1987 .

[60]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Interpretations of Probability , 1999 .

[61]  Klaus Harter,et al.  Integrating Biological Perspectives:. a Quantum Leap for Microarray Expression Analysis , 2009 .

[62]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Bell’s inequality, Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen arguments and von Neumann’s projection postulate , 2009 .

[63]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum-like model of glucose effect on Escherichia coli growth , 2012 .

[64]  Taksu Cheon,et al.  Classical and quantum contents of solvable game theory on Hilbert space , 2006 .