Effect of multimode entanglement on lossy optical quantum metrology
暂无分享,去创建一个
Kae Nemoto | William J. Munro | Timothy Proctor | Jacob Dunningham | P. A. Knott | W. Munro | K. Nemoto | J. Dunningham | P. Knott | T. Proctor
[1] James C. Gates,et al. High quantum efficiency photon-number-resolving detector for photonic on-chip information processing , 2013, CLEO: 2013.
[3] Yaron Silberberg,et al. Supersensitive polarization microscopy using NOON states of light. , 2014, Physical review letters.
[4] Brian J. Smith,et al. Optimal quantum phase estimation. , 2008, Physical review letters.
[5] Jonathan P. Dowling,et al. A quantum Rosetta stone for interferometry , 2002, quant-ph/0202133.
[6] C. Gerry,et al. Nonlocal entanglement of coherent states, complementarity, and quantum erasure , 2007 .
[7] C. Gerry,et al. Nonlinear interferometer as a resource for maximally entangled photonic states: Application to interferometry , 2002 .
[8] S. Lloyd,et al. Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit , 2004, Science.
[9] Charles Kervrann,et al. Fast live simultaneous multiwavelength four-dimensional optical microscopy , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[10] K. Banaszek,et al. Quantum phase estimation with lossy interferometers , 2009, 0904.0456.
[11] 宁北芳,et al. 疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .
[12] Joachim Knittel,et al. Biological measurement beyond the quantum limit , 2012, Nature Photonics.
[13] Davide Girolami,et al. Characterizing nonclassical correlations via local quantum uncertainty. , 2012, Physical review letters.
[14] J Fan,et al. Invited review article: Single-photon sources and detectors. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.
[15] Andrea Fiore,et al. Superconducting nanowire photon-number-resolving detector at telecommunication wavelengths , 2008 .
[16] Sanders,et al. Entangled coherent states. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.
[17] L. Davidovich,et al. General framework for estimating the ultimate precision limit in noisy quantum-enhanced metrology , 2011, 1201.1693.
[18] J. Flowers. The Route to Atomic and Quantum Standards , 2004, Science.
[19] Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al. Ann , 2005 .
[20] D G Cory,et al. Entanglement assisted metrology. , 2005, Physical review letters.
[21] C. Caves. Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers , 1982 .
[22] B. Sanders. Review of entangled coherent states , 2011, 1112.1778.
[23] Samuel L. Braunstein,et al. Weak-force detection with superposed coherent states , 2002 .
[24] Sae Woo Nam,et al. Generation of optical coherent-state superpositions by number-resolved photon subtraction from the squeezed vacuum , 2010, 1004.2727.
[25] W. Munro,et al. Attaining subclassical metrology in lossy systems with entangled coherent states , 2014, 1401.4006.
[26] Y. Silberberg,et al. High-NOON States by Mixing Quantum and Classical Light , 2010, Science.
[27] R. Rosenfeld. Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
[28] G. G. Stokes. "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[29] Dreyer,et al. Observing the Progressive Decoherence of the "Meter" in a Quantum Measurement. , 1996, Physical review letters.
[30] G. R. Jin,et al. Quantum Fisher information of entangled coherent states in the presence of photon loss , 2013, 1307.7353.
[31] Jonathan P. Dowling,et al. Creation of large-photon-number path entanglement conditioned on photodetection , 2001, quant-ph/0112002.
[32] Kae Nemoto,et al. Quantum metrology for nonlinear phase shifts with entangled coherent states , 2012, 1203.2099.
[33] Kimble,et al. Unconditional quantum teleportation , 1998, Science.
[34] Derek K. Jones,et al. Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light , 2013, Nature Photonics.
[35] William J Munro,et al. Quantum metrology with entangled coherent states. , 2011, Physical review letters.
[36] Jan Kolodynski,et al. Efficient tools for quantum metrology with uncorrelated noise , 2013, 1303.7271.
[37] A. P. Lund,et al. Conditional production of superpositions of coherent states with inefficient photon detection , 2004 .
[38] Matteo G. A. Paris,et al. Displacement operator by beam splitter , 1996 .
[39] David Blair,et al. A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit: Squeezed light in application , 2011, 1109.2295.
[40] N. Godbout,et al. Entanglement-enhanced probing of a delicate material system , 2012, Nature Photonics.
[41] R. Schoelkopf,et al. Deterministic protocol for mapping a qubit to coherent state superpositions in a cavity , 2012, 1205.2401.
[42] C. Gerry,et al. Maximally entangled coherent states and strong violations of Bell-type inequalities , 2009 .
[43] M. Lewenstein,et al. Quantum non-demolition detection of strongly correlated systems , 2007, 0709.0527.
[44] G. Zumofen,et al. Controlling the phase of a light beam with a single molecule. , 2011, Physical review letters.
[45] G. Milburn,et al. Generalized uncertainty relations: Theory, examples, and Lorentz invariance , 1995, quant-ph/9507004.
[46] Yun Li,et al. Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology , 2010, Nature.
[47] Heisenberg-limited interferometry with pair coherent states and parity measurements , 2010, 1005.5038.
[48] T. Ralph. Coherent superposition states as quantum rulers , 2002 .
[49] S. Braunstein,et al. Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states. , 1994, Physical review letters.
[50] N. Mavalvala,et al. Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy. , 2010, Nature communications.
[51] Marco Barbieri,et al. Sequential Path Entanglement for Quantum Metrology , 2013, Scientific Reports.
[52] Taro Itatani,et al. Titanium-based transition-edge photon number resolving detector with 98% detection efficiency with index-matched small-gap fiber coupling. , 2011, Optics express.
[53] J. Cirac,et al. Improvement of frequency standards with quantum entanglement , 1997, quant-ph/9707014.
[54] R. Schnabel,et al. First long-term application of squeezed states of light in a gravitational-wave observatory. , 2013, Physical review letters.
[55] Marco Barbieri,et al. Multiphoton state engineering by heralded interference between single photons and coherent states , 2012, 1205.0497.
[56] Abrams,et al. Quantum interferometric optical lithography: exploiting entanglement to beat the diffraction limit , 1999, Physical review letters.
[57] E. Jaynes,et al. Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser , 1962 .
[58] W. Munro,et al. Entanglement is not a critical resource for quantum metrology , 2009, 0906.1027.
[59] C. Gerry. Generation of Schrödinger cats and entangled coherent states in the motion of a trapped ionby a dispersive interaction , 1997 .
[60] Rafał Demkowicz-Dobrzański,et al. The elusive Heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology , 2012, Nature Communications.
[61] Konrad Banaszek,et al. Fundamental quantum interferometry bound for the squeezed-light-enhanced gravitational wave detector GEO 600 , 2013, 1305.7268.
[62] Physical Review , 1965, Nature.
[63] Keiji Sasaki,et al. Beating the Standard Quantum Limit with Four-Entangled Photons , 2007, Science.