Noncrossover Dither Creeping Mutation-Based Genetic Algorithm for Pipe Network Optimization

A noncrossover dither creeping mutation-based genetic algorithm (CMBGA) for pipe network optimization has been developed and is analyzed in this paper. This CMBGA differs from the classic genetic algorithm (GA) optimization in that it does not utilize the crossover operator; instead, it only uses selection and a proposed dither creeping mutation operator. The creeping mutation rate in the proposed dither creeping mutation operator is randomly generated in a range throughout a GA run, rather than being set to a fixed value. In addition, the dither mutation rate is applied at an individual chromosome level rather than at the generation level. The dither creeping mutation probability is set to take values from a small range that is centered about 1=ND(where ND= number of decision variables of the optimization problem being considered). This is motivated by the fact that a mutation probability of approximately 1=NDpreviously has been demonstrated to be an effective value and is commonly used for the GA. Two case studies are used to investigate the effectiveness of the proposed CMBGA. An objective of this paper is to compare the performance of the proposed CMBGA with four other GA variants and other published results. The results show that the proposed CMBGA exhibits considerable improvement over the considered GAvariants, and comparable performance with respect to other previously published results. Two big advantages of the CMBGA are its simplicity and the fact that it requires the tuning of fewer parameters compared with other GA variants. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000351. © 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.

[1]  Angus R. Simpson,et al.  ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION FOR THE DESIGN OF WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[2]  Aaron C. Zecchin,et al.  Hybrid discrete dynamically dimensioned search (HD‐DDS) algorithm for water distribution system design optimization , 2009 .

[3]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  A genetic algorithm calibration method based on convergence due to genetic drift , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[4]  William M. Spears,et al.  Crossover or Mutation? , 1992, FOGA.

[5]  Juan Martínez,et al.  Genetic algorithms for the design of looped irrigation water distribution networks , 2006 .

[6]  Angus R. Simpson,et al.  Ant Colony Optimization for Design of Water Distribution Systems , 2003 .

[7]  Mohammed Ali,et al.  Optimal Design of Water Distribution Systems Using Genetic Algorithms , 2000 .

[8]  D. B. Khang,et al.  A two‐phase decomposition method for optimal design of looped water distribution networks , 1990 .

[9]  K. Deb An Efficient Constraint Handling Method for Genetic Algorithms , 2000 .

[10]  Graeme C. Dandy,et al.  Genetic algorithms compared to other techniques for pipe optimization , 1994 .

[11]  Amit Konar,et al.  Two improved differential evolution schemes for faster global search , 2005, GECCO '05.

[12]  Ivanoe De Falco,et al.  Mutation-based genetic algorithm: performance evaluation , 2002, Appl. Soft Comput..

[13]  Lawrence J. Fogel,et al.  Artificial Intelligence through Simulated Evolution , 1966 .

[14]  Angus R. Simpson,et al.  Ant Colony Optimization Applied to Water Distribution System Design: Comparative Study of Five Algorithms , 2007 .

[15]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  State of the Art for Genetic Algorithms and Beyond in Water Resources Planning and Management , 2010 .

[16]  A. Simpson,et al.  An Improved Genetic Algorithm for Pipe Network Optimization , 1996 .

[17]  J. W. Atmar,et al.  Comparing genetic operators with gaussian mutations in simulated evolutionary processes using linear systems , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Angus R. Simpson,et al.  Dynamically Expanding Choice-Table Approach to Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Water Distribution Systems , 2011 .