Cognitive cooperation

Cooperation can evolve in the context of cognitive activities such as perception, attention, memory, and decision making, in addition to physical activities such as hunting, gathering, warfare, and childcare. The social insects are well known to cooperate on both physical and cognitive tasks, but the idea of cognitive cooperation in humans has not received widespread attention or systematic study. The traditional psychological literature often gives the impression that groups are dysfunctional cognitive units, while evolutionary psychologists have so far studied cognition primarily at the individual level. We present two experiments that demonstrate the superiority of thinking in groups, but only for tasks that are sufficiently challenging to exceed the capacity of individuals. One of the experiments is in a brain-storming format, where advantages of real groups over nominal groups have been notoriously difficult to demonstrate. Cognitive cooperation might often operate beneath conscious awareness and take place without the need for overt training, as evolutionary psychologists have stressed for individual-level cognitive adaptations. In general, cognitive cooperation should be a central subject in human evolutionary psychology, as it already is in the study of the social insects.

[1]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. , 1993 .

[2]  T. Seeley The Wisdom of the Hive , 1995 .

[3]  I. Janis Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[4]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats , 1995 .

[5]  C. Zahn-Waxler,et al.  Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. , 1999 .

[6]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Assembly bonus effect or typical group performance ? a comment on Michaelsen, Watson, and Black (1989) , 1992 .

[7]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: A longitudinal study. , 1991 .

[8]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. , 1992 .

[10]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Making Group Brainstorming More Effective: Recommendations From an Associative Memory Perspective , 2002 .

[11]  E. Salas,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. , 1991 .

[12]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. , 1989 .

[13]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[14]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[15]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[16]  I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt,et al.  Emergency Decisions, Cultural-Selection Mechanics, and Group Selection [and Comments and Reply] , 1996, Current Anthropology.

[17]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Inspiration for optimization from social insect behaviour , 2000, Nature.

[18]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991 .

[19]  It's not how you frame the question, it's how you interpret the results. , 1992 .

[20]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  Twenty questions: efficiency in problem solving as a function of size of group. , 1952, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[21]  T. Seeley,et al.  Group decision making in swarms of honey bees , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[23]  L. Dugatkin Cooperation Among Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1997 .

[24]  G. W. Hill Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .

[25]  M. Diehl,et al.  Why Groups are less Effective than their Members: On Productivity Losses in Idea-generating Groups , 1994 .

[26]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[27]  Group decision making : how you frame the question determines what you find , 1992 .

[28]  D. Wilson,et al.  Gossip and other aspects of language as group-level adaptations , 2000 .