Identity in Charitable Giving

How does priming identity affect charitable giving? We show that individuals are more likely to donate when a facet of their identity associated with a norm of generosity is primed in an appeal. In large charitable giving field experiments run by the American Red Cross, appeals that prime an individual’s identity as a previous donor to the charity or as a member of a local community generate more donations. The primes are more effective when they highlight a facet of the potential donor’s identity that we hypothesize to be more relevant to his sense of self: priming identity as a previous donor is more effective for more regular donors and priming identity as a local community member is more effective for people in smaller communities. Together, these results elucidate the impact of identity on behavior and demonstrate how identity primes can be implemented in practice to encourage public good provision. This paper was accepted by Uri Gneezy, behavioral economics.

[1]  N. Sanders,et al.  Journal of behavioral decision making: "The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting", 5 (1992) 39-52 , 1992 .

[2]  Dean S. Karlan,et al.  Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment , 2006 .

[3]  D. Ariely,et al.  Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  L. Hedges,et al.  Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. , 1995, Science.

[5]  L. Steen,et al.  Mathematics education: a predictor of scientific competitiveness. , 1987, Science.

[6]  Armin Falk,et al.  Preferences for Consistency , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  A. Shariff,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article God Is Watching You Priming God Concepts Increases Prosocial Behavior in an Anonymous Economic Game , 2022 .

[8]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Altruism as hedonism: a social development perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  E. Fehr,et al.  Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry , 2014, Nature.

[10]  Jonathan Meer,et al.  The Habit of Giving , 2013 .

[11]  Winnifred R. Louis,et al.  Group Norms and the Attitude–Behaviour Relationship , 2009 .

[12]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All , 2000 .

[13]  N. Ambady,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance , 1999 .

[14]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[15]  Paul D. Berger,et al.  The impact of direct marketing appeals on charitable marketing effectiveness , 1996 .

[16]  Mark Levine,et al.  Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out‐group , 1994 .

[17]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[18]  Neeli Bendapudi,et al.  Enhancing Helping Behavior: An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning , 1996 .

[19]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Test of a concession procedure for inducing verbal, behavioral, and further compliance with a request to give blood. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The limits of anchoring. , 1994 .

[21]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  L. Ross,et al.  The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Moves , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[23]  Daniel W. Elfenbein,et al.  Charity as a Substitute for Reputation: Evidence from an Online Marketplace , 2010 .

[24]  J. Meer.  Brother, can you spare a dime? Peer pressure in charitable solicitation ☆ , 2011 .

[25]  Jerome B. Kernan,et al.  Mundane Consumption and the Self: A Social-Identity Perspective , 1993 .

[26]  Judd B. Kessler.  Announcements of Support and Public Good Provision , 2017 .

[27]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[28]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  Avoiding The Ask : A Field Experiment on Altruism , Empathy , and Charitable Giving ∗ , 2011 .

[29]  David Lucking-Reiley,et al.  The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. , 1999 .

[31]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  The Intensity of Ethnic Affiliation: A Study of the Sociology of Hispanic Consumption , 1986 .

[32]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Identity Congruency Effects on Donations , 2008 .

[33]  Armin Falk,et al.  Gift Exchange in the Field , 2007 .

[34]  J. List,et al.  Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving , 2009, The quarterly journal of economics.

[35]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[36]  Jean Tirole,et al.  Willpower and Personal Rules , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[37]  Americus Reed.  Activating the Self‐Importance of Consumer Selves: Exploring Identity Salience Effects on Judgments , 2004 .

[38]  John A. Schibrowsky,et al.  Decision frames and direct marketing offers: A field study in a fundraising context , 1995 .

[39]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Increasing compliance by legitimizing paltry contributions: When even a penny helps. , 1976 .

[40]  Temple F. Smith.  Occam's razor , 1980, Nature.

[41]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels , 2008 .

[42]  Uri Simonsohn,et al.  Friends of Victims: Personal Experience and Prosocial Behavior , 2006 .

[43]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[44]  G. Becker,et al.  A Theory of Social Interactions , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[45]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Shared Social Responsibility: A Field Experiment in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing and Charitable Giving , 2010, Science.

[46]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Case-Based Decision Theory , 1995 .

[47]  George E. Newman,et al.  The counterintuitive effects of thank-you gifts on charitable giving , 2012 .

[48]  J. Andreoni.  Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[49]  J. Bargh.  What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. , 2006, European journal of social psychology.

[50]  Jonathan Meer,et al.  The Abcs of Charitable Solicitation , 2009 .

[51]  Serge-Christophe Kolm,et al.  Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity , 2006 .

[52]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[53]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions , 1987 .

[54]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Common Identity and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: An Experimental Investigation , 2014 .

[55]  Judd B. Kessler,et al.  Can Social Information Affect What Job You Choose and Keep , 2017 .

[56]  Jen Shang,et al.  A Field Experiment in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods , 2009 .

[57]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[58]  Mark R. Leary,et al.  Handbook of self and identity , 2003 .

[59]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability , 2003 .

[60]  S. Sherman.  On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. , 1980 .

[61]  D. Ariely,et al.  “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences , 2003 .

[62]  J. Andreoni.  IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS: A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING* , 1990 .

[63]  C. Batson.  The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[64]  R. Deshpandé,et al.  Situational Ethnicity and Consumer Behavior , 1989 .

[65]  J. Habermas.  On Social Identity , 1974, Telos.

[66]  Michael K. Price,et al.  Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment , 2008 .

[67]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  The Conflicting Choices of Alternating Selves , 2010 .

[68]  Stacey R. Finkelstein,et al.  Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults , 2006, Psychological science.

[69]  B. Frey,et al.  Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing "Conditional Cooperation" in a Field Experiment , 2004 .

[70]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Economics and Identity , 2000 .

[71]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[72]  J. Turner.  Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. , 2010 .

[73]  Lise Vesterlund.  Why Do People Give? , 2021, Successful Fundraising.

[74]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice , 2004 .

[75]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Organizational Fundraising: Further Evidence on the Effect of Legitimizing Small Donations , 1984 .

[76]  W. James.  The principles of psychology , 1983 .

[77]  M. Hogg,et al.  The theory of planned behaviour: self-identity, social identity and group norms. , 1999, The British journal of social psychology.

[78]  Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,et al.  Dogs on the Street, Pumas on Your Feet: How Cues in the Environment Influence Product Evaluation and Choice , 2008 .

[79]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.