Hydrogen Production in a Single Chamber Microbial Electrolysis Cell Lacking a Membrane

Hydrogen gas can be produced by electrohydrogenesis in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) at greater yields than fermentation and at greater energy efficiencies than water electrolysis. It has been assumed that a membrane is needed in an MEC to avoid hydrogen losses due to bacterial consumption of the product gas. However, high cathodic hydrogen recoveries (78 ( 1% to 96 ( 1%) were achieved in an MEC despite the absence of a membrane between the electrodes (applied voltages of 0.3 < Eap < 0.8 V; 7.5 mS/cm solutionconductivity).Throughtheuseofamembrane-lesssystem, a graphite fiber brush anode, and close electrode spacing, hydrogen production rates reached a maximum of 3.12 ( 0.02 m3 H2/m reactor per day (292 ( 1 A/m3) at an applied voltage of Eap ) 0.8 V. This production rate is more than double that obtained in previous MEC studies. The energy efficiency relative to the electrical input decreased with applied voltage from 406 ( 6% (Eap ) 0.3 V) to 194 ( 2% (Eap ) 0.8 V). Overall energy efficiency relative to both Eap and energy of the substrate averaged 78 ( 4%, with a maximum of 86 ( 2% (1.02 ( 0.05 m3 H2/m day, Eap ) 0.4 V). At Eap ) 0.2 V, the hydrogen recovery substantially decreased, and methane concentrations increased from an average of 1.9 ( 1.3% (Eap ) 0.3–0.8 V) to 28 ( 0% of the gas, due to the long cycle time of the reactor. Increasing the solution conductivity to 20 mS/ cm increased hydrogen production rates for Eap ) 0.3–0.6 V, but consistent reactor performance could not be obtained in the high conductivity solution at Eap > 0.6 V. These results demonstrate that high hydrogen recovery and production rates are possible in a single chamber MEC without a membrane, potentially reducing the costs of these systems and allowing for new and simpler designs.

[1]  John A. Turner,et al.  Sustainable Hydrogen Production , 2004, Science.

[2]  J. N. B U I S M A N,et al.  Hydrogen Production with a Microbial Biocathode , 2007 .

[3]  Hong Liu,et al.  Power generation in fed-batch microbial fuel cells as a function of ionic strength, temperature, and reactor configuration. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  B. Logan,et al.  Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells. , 2006, Trends in microbiology.

[5]  Broome,et al.  Literature cited , 1924, A Guide to the Carnivores of Central America.

[6]  David M. Bagley,et al.  Experimental Determination of Energy Content of Unknown Organics in Municipal Wastewater Streams , 2004 .

[7]  E. E. L O G A N,et al.  Electricity Generation Using an Air-Cathode Single Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell in the Presence and Absence of a Proton Exchange Membrane , 2022 .

[8]  Bruce E Logan,et al.  Microbial fuel cells--challenges and applications. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  B. Logan,et al.  Graphite fiber brush anodes for increased power production in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Electrochemically Assisted Biohydrogen Production from Acetate , 2008 .

[11]  H. Hamelers,et al.  Effects of membrane cation transport on pH and microbial fuel cell performance. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Sangeun Oh,et al.  The relative effectiveness of pH control and heat treatment for enhancing biohydrogen gas production. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Biofuel Cells Select for Microbial Consortia That Self-Mediate Electron Transfer , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  D. R. Bond,et al.  Electricity Production by Geobacter sulfurreducens Attached to Electrodes , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  C. Thurston,et al.  Microbial fuel-cells , 1993 .

[16]  E. E. L O G A N,et al.  Increased Power Generation in a Continuous Flow MFC with Advective Flow through the Porous Anode and Reduced Electrode Spacing , 2022 .

[17]  C. Woese,et al.  Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group , 1979, Microbiological reviews.

[18]  H. Hamelers,et al.  Performance of single chamber biocatalyzed electrolysis with different types of ion exchange membranes. , 2007, Water research.

[19]  G. Zeeman,et al.  The role of sludge retention time in the hydrolysis and acidification of lipids, carbohydrates and proteins during digestion of primary sludge in CSTR systems , 2000 .

[20]  Hong Liu,et al.  Production of hydrogen from domestic wastewater using a bioelectrochemically assisted microbial reactor (BEAMR) , 2007 .

[21]  Bruce E Logan,et al.  Sustainable and efficient biohydrogen production via electrohydrogenesis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Sang-Eun Oh,et al.  Biological hydrogen production measured in batch anaerobic respirometers. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  H. Hamelers,et al.  Principle and perspectives of hydrogen production through biocatalyzed electrolysis , 2006 .

[24]  E. E. L O G A N,et al.  Electrochemically Assisted Microbial Production of Hydrogen from Acetate , 2022 .

[25]  J. Ivy,et al.  Summary of Electrolytic Hydrogen Production: Milestone Completion Report , 2004 .

[26]  Sangeun Oh,et al.  Proton exchange membrane and electrode surface areas as factors that affect power generation in microbial fuel cells , 2006, Applied microbiology and biotechnology.

[27]  E. E. L O G A N,et al.  Production of Electricity from Acetate or Butyrate Using a Single-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell , 2022 .

[28]  Bruce E. Logan,et al.  AMMONIA TREATMENT OF CARBON CLOTH ANODES TO ENHANCE POWER GENERATION OF MICROBIAL FUEL CELLS , 2007 .