Public Agencies and Private Firms

There is an increasing interest in applying organization theory to public organizations as such, and a need for clarifying the distinction between public and private organizations. This quantitative case study compares questionnaire responses by middle managers in nonprofit public agencies and private profit-making corporations, to test hypotheses concerning differences in incentive structures, organizational goal clarity, and individual role characteristics. The public managers perceive a weaker relationship between performance and extrinsic rewards (weaker "expectancies'") and regard formal personnel procedures (e.g., civil service systems) as constraints on the administration of such rewards. They show higher scores on formalization scales, and are lower on certain dimensions of work satisfaction. There are no differences on scales of organizational goal clarity, role conflict, role ambiguity, and motivational variables.

[1]  M. Fottler,et al.  Is management really generic? , 1981, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[2]  Cynthia M. Pavett,et al.  The Nature of Managerial Work: A Comparison of Public and Private Sector Jobs. , 1980 .

[3]  Carol H. Weiss,et al.  Making bureaucracies work: Carol H. Weiss and Allen H. Barton (eds.) Sage Publications, 1980 pp. 309 , 1980 .

[4]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[5]  Charles J. McMillan,et al.  Change in Public Bureaucracies. , 1980 .

[6]  Philip B. Coulter,et al.  Organizational Effectiveness in the Public Sector: The Example of Municipal Fire Protection. , 1979 .

[7]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[8]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[9]  Howard E. Mccurdy.  SELECTING AND TRAINING PUBLIC MANAGERS: BUSINESS SKILLS VERSUS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION , 1978 .

[10]  Robert Dewar,et al.  An examination of the reliability and validity of the Aiken and Hage scales of centralization, formalization and task routineness / BEBR No. 387 , 1977 .

[11]  P. Khandwalla.  The design of organizations , 1977 .

[12]  Richard H. Hall,et al.  Organizations: Structure and process , 1977 .

[13]  Frank R. Hunsicker.  Contingency Approaches to Leadership , 1976 .

[14]  Robert W. Backoff,et al.  Comparing Public and Private Organizations , 1976 .

[15]  Fremont James Lyden,et al.  Using Parsons' Functional Analysis in the Study of Public Organizations , 1975 .

[16]  Bruce Buchanan,et al.  Red-Tape and the Service Ethic , 1975 .

[17]  F. Thompson.  Personnel policy in the city , 1975 .

[18]  Bruce Buchanan,et al.  Government Managers, Business Executives, and Organizational Commitment , 1974 .

[19]  M. Zald,et al.  The political economy of public organizations : a critique and approach to the study of public administration , 1974 .

[20]  Gary L. Wamsley,et al.  The political economy of public organizations , 1973 .

[21]  C. Argyris,et al.  The applicability of organizational sociology , 1973 .

[22]  J. W. Macy.  Public service;: The human side of government , 1971 .

[23]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[24]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  Personal factors in organizational identification. , 1970 .

[25]  M. Aiken,et al.  Routine Technology, Social Structure, and Organization Goals , 1969 .

[26]  R. Golembiewski.  Organization Development in Public Agencies: Perspectives On Theory And Practice , 1969 .

[27]  D. Pugh,et al.  The Context of Organization Structures , 1969 .

[28]  H L Ross,et al.  THE CONNECTICUT CRACKDOWN ON SPEEDING: TIME-SERIES DATA IN QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS , 1968 .

[29]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Managerial attitudes and performance , 1968 .

[30]  T. M. Lodahl,et al.  THE DEFINITION AND MEASUREMENT OF JOB INVOLVEMENT. , 1965, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  C. Lindblom,et al.  Politics, Economics and Welfare. , 1953 .