The into-causative construction in English: a construction-based perspective 1

The so-called into-causative construction, involving the pattern ‘V NP into V-ing’, raises intriguing questions in terms of lexical creativity as well as variation. This article, based on nearly 20,000 tokens from more than 1.3 billion words of text, from both British and American English, carries out a comprehensive corpus-based investigation of the construction. The article supports past research on certain types of variation in the use of the construction in British and American English, but sheds new light on how these may relate to diachronic shifts as well as to synchronic variation. The article also sketches a construction-based analysis to account for the grammatical properties of the into-causative construction. In particular, it shows that the construction, as an extension of the caused-motion construction, shares grammatical properties with its family constructions including the resultative and way constructions, but is distinctive from these in several respects. By allowing close interactions between the matrix verb and the grammatical constructions, the constructional view can also account for innovative uses of the construction.

[1]  S. Gries,et al.  Language, culture and mind , 2004 .

[2]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Conceptual structure, discourse and language , 1996 .

[3]  Laura A. Michaelis.  Sign-based Construction Grammar Center for the Study of Language and Information , 2012 .

[4]  Juhani Rudanko.  Lexico‐Grammatical Innovation in Current British and American English: a Case Study on the Transitive into ‐ing Pattern with Evidence from the Bank of English Corpus , 2005 .

[5]  Christian Mair,et al.  Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: a real-time study based on matching text corpora , 2002, English Language and Linguistics.

[6]  Terttu Nevalainen,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of the History of English , 2012 .

[7]  H. Hughes.  The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2003 .

[8]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  English Corpus Linguistics: Looking back, Moving forward , 2012 .

[9]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives , 2001 .

[10]  Michel Achard,et al.  Language, culture and mind , 2004 .

[11]  Loraine I. Bridgeman.  More classes of verbs in English , 1965 .

[12]  A. Goldberg,et al.  The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions , 2004 .

[13]  Marina Dossena,et al.  Insights into late modern English , 2003 .

[14]  Eva Berlage,et al.  Noun Phrase Complexity in English , 2014 .

[15]  I. Sag.  Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis , 2012 .

[16]  J. Rudanko.  Changes in Complementation in British and American English , 2011 .

[17]  Britta Mondorf,et al.  Variation and change in English resultative constructions , 2010, Language Variation and Change.

[18]  Hans C. Boas,et al.  Sign-Based Construction Grammar , 2012 .

[19]  Günter Rohdenburg.  Functional constraints in syntactic change: The rise and fall of prepositional constructions in early and Late Modern English , 2007 .

[20]  Mark Davies.  Some methodological issues related to corpus-based investigations of recent syntactic changes in English , 2012 .

[21]  Adele E. Goldberg.  Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  G. Leech.  Modality on the move: the English modal auxiliaries 1961-1992. , 2003 .

[23]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Grammatical constructions : their form and meaning , 1999 .

[24]  Susan Hunston,et al.  Book Reviews: Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English , 2000, CL.

[25]  Stefanie Wulff,et al.  Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specifc meaning construction in theinto-causative , 2007 .

[26]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[27]  Robert Malouf,et al.  Mixed categories in the hierarchical lexicon , 1998 .

[28]  Juhani Rudanko.  Emergent Alternation in Complement Selection , 2006 .

[29]  Multiple inheritance and constructional change , 2013 .

[30]  Franziska Frankfurter,et al.  Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure: Adele E. Goldberg, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1995. xi + 265 pp , 1998 .

[31]  Kristin Davidse.  Gill Francis, Susan Hunston and Elizabeth Manning (eds.) Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs , 1998 .

[32]  Günter Radden,et al.  Aspects of Meaning Construction , 2007 .

[33]  Jong-Bok Kim,et al.  The TRANSITIVE INTO -ING Construction in English: A Usage-based Approach , 2013 .

[34]  Roberta Facchinetti,et al.  Modality in Contemporary English , 2003 .