A Novel Time-Switching Relaying Protocol for Multi-user Relay Networks with SWIPT

In this paper, we propose a new time-switching relaying (TSR) protocol for dual-hop relay networks with simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) technique. The proposed protocol maintains the same receiver complexity of the conventional TSR protocol with the ability for implementing them using the same hardware. We study the performance of the proposed TSR protocol and compare it with the conventional TSR and power-splitting relaying protocols. Unified analytical expressions are derived for the outage probability, achievable throughput, and the ergodic channel capacity, in addition to studying the performance at high signal-to-noise ratio values where a unified approximate expression for the outage probability and expressions for the diversity order and coding gain are provided. The results show that the proposed TSR protocol outperforms the conventional TSR protocol in terms of outage probability and throughput. Also, findings illustrate that applying the SWIPT technique in multi-destination relay networks results in a unity diversity order. In contrast to conventional relaying networks, results show that the best location for the relay node in SWIPT relay networks is either near the source or the destinations but not in between.

[1]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Shannon meets Tesla: Wireless information and power transfer , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[2]  Ali A. Nasir,et al.  Relaying Protocols for Wireless Energy Harvesting and Information Processing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  QoS-Constrained Relay Control for Full-Duplex Relaying With SWIPT , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Wan Choi,et al.  Multi-user diversity in a spectrum sharing system , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Xiao Lu,et al.  Dynamic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks with RF energy harvesting , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[6]  Sixing Yin,et al.  Resource Allocation in Cooperative Networks With Wireless Information and Power Transfer , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Multi-User SWIPT Cooperative Networks: Is the Max–Min Criterion Still Diversity-Optimal? , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Jun Li,et al.  Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT): Recent Advances and Future Challenges , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[9]  Saman Atapattu,et al.  Optimal Energy Harvesting Protocols for Wireless Relay Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Amir Ghasemi,et al.  Fundamental limits of spectrum-sharing in fading environments , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Zhiguo Ding,et al.  The Impact of Power Allocation on Cooperative Non-orthogonal Multiple Access Networks With SWIPT , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[12]  Norman C. Beaulieu,et al.  Outage Analysis of Opportunistic Scheduling in Dual-Hop Multiuser Relay Networks in the Presence of Interference , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[13]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Digital Communication Over Fading Channels: A Unified Approach to Performance Analysis , 2000 .

[14]  Lav R. Varshney,et al.  Transporting information and energy simultaneously , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[15]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Multi-Destination Cognitive Radio Relay Network with SWIPT and Multiple Primary Receivers , 2017, 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[16]  Rui Zhang,et al.  MIMO Broadcasting for Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer , 2013 .

[17]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  On the Capacity-Fairness Tradeoff in Multiuser Diversity Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[18]  Jinhong Yuan,et al.  Impact of Opportunistic Scheduling on Cooperative Dual-Hop Relay Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[19]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[20]  Dinh-Thuan Do,et al.  Optimal power allocation and throughput performance of full-duplex DF relaying networks with wireless power transfer-aware channel , 2017, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[21]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  Optimal Performance Versus Fairness Tradeoff for Resource Allocation in Wireless Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[22]  Nhu Tri Do,et al.  A BNBF User Selection Scheme for NOMA-Based Cooperative Relaying Systems With SWIPT , 2017, IEEE Communications Letters.

[23]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  Relay Selection Analysis for an Opportunistic Two-Hop Multi-User System in a Poisson Field of Nodes , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[24]  Ali A. Nasir,et al.  Throughput and ergodic capacity of wireless energy harvesting based DF relaying network , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[25]  Daniel Benevides da Costa,et al.  Transmit antenna selection schemes for MISO-NOMA cooperative downlink transmissions with hybrid SWIPT protocol , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[26]  Ronald Y. Chang,et al.  Energy-Assisted Decode-and-Forward for Energy Harvesting Cooperative Cognitive Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking.

[27]  MinChul Ju,et al.  Maximum Transmission Rate of PSR/TSR Protocols in Wireless Energy Harvesting DF-Based Relay Networks , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.