Peri- and Interprosthetic Femoral Fractures—Current Concepts and New Developments for Internal Fixation

Treatment of peri- and interprosthetic fractures represents a challenge in orthopedic trauma surgery. Multiple factors such as osteoporosis, polymedication and comorbidities impede therapy and the rehabilitation of this difficult fracture entity. This article summarizes current concepts and highlights new developments for the internal fixation of periprosthetic fractures. Since the elderly are unable to follow partial weight bearing, stable solutions are required. Therefore, a high primary stability is necessary. Numerous options, such as new angular stable plate systems with additional options for variable angle screw positioning, already exist and are in the process of being further improved. Lately, individually produced custom-made implants are offering interesting alternatives to treat periprosthetic fractures.

[1]  M. Raschke,et al.  Periprosthetic fracture fixation in Vancouver B1 femoral shaft fractures: A biomechanical study comparing two plate systems , 2020, Journal of orthopaedic translation.

[2]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Lower reoperation rate with locking plates compared with conventional plates in Vancouver type C periprosthetic femoral fractures: A register study of 639 cases in Sweden. , 2019, Injury.

[3]  M. Chang,et al.  Management and clinical outcomes of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty with a stem extension , 2019, Medicine.

[4]  T. Randau,et al.  [Intercalary reconstruction for diaphyseal bone defects with a modular replacement system: Clinical results]. , 2015, Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie.

[5]  K. Delank,et al.  Periprosthetic femoral fracture - an interdisciplinary challenge. , 2014, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[6]  F. Haddad,et al.  The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[7]  M. Raschke,et al.  A laboratory investigation to assess the influence of cement augmentation of screw and plate fixation in a simulation of distal femoral fracture of osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic bone. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[8]  Alison C Jones,et al.  The effect of fracture stability on the performance of locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  S. Lenschow,et al.  The potential of implant augmentation in the treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures: a biomechanical study. , 2013, Injury.

[10]  C. Haasper,et al.  Treatment of interprosthetic femoral fractures with an interposition prosthesis , 2013, Acta orthopaedica.

[11]  Robert Koch-Institut.  Daten und Fakten: Ergebnisse der Studie "Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell 2010" , 2012 .

[12]  Johan Sundström,et al.  Prediction of fracture risk in men: A cohort study , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  R. G. Richards,et al.  Biomechanical performance of different cable and wire cerclage configurations , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[14]  J. Singh,et al.  Association of peptic ulcer disease and pulmonary disease with risk of periprosthetic fracture after primary total knee arthroplasty , 2011, Arthritis care & research.

[15]  M. Raschke,et al.  [Periprosthetic fractures. An interdisciplinary challenge]. , 2011, Der Unfallchirurg.

[16]  M. Raschke.  [Classical trauma of the elderly or injury of senior citizens?]. , 2011, Der Unfallchirurg.

[17]  K. Leung,et al.  Periprosthetic Fractures: Epidemiology and Future Projections , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[18]  S. Perren,et al.  Cerclage handling for improved fracture treatment. A biomechanical study on the twisting procedure. , 2011, Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca.

[19]  T. Gardner,et al.  The effect of fixation technique on the stiffness of comminuted Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  F. Sung,et al.  Polypharmacy Correlates With Increased Risk for Hip Fracture in the Elderly: A Population-Based Study , 2010, Medicine.

[21]  J. Owen,et al.  Does Femoral Component Loosening Predispose to Femoral Fracture?: An In Vitro Comparison of Cemented Hips , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Periprosthetic knee fractures. , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[23]  H. Malchau,et al.  Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. , 2007, Injury.

[24]  R. Buckley,et al.  Fracture healing in osteoporotic fractures: is it really different? A basic science perspective. , 2007, Injury.

[25]  P. Herberts,et al.  Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  R. Burgkart,et al.  Periprothetische Frakturen nach Knietotalendoprothetik , 2006, Der Orthopäde.

[27]  U. Stöckle,et al.  Periprothetische Frakturen nach Knietotalendoprothetik , 2005, Der Unfallchirurg.

[28]  K. Schaser,et al.  [Periprosthetic fractures after total knee joint arthroplasty]. , 2005, Der Unfallchirurg.

[29]  A. Gruner,et al.  Die periprothetische Fraktur , 2004, Der Unfallchirurg.

[30]  B. Masri,et al.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. , 1995, Instructional course lectures.