Contingent Valuation Surveys and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope

The central claim made by critics of contingent valuation (CV) is that respondents to a CV survey are inherently unresponsive to the characteristics of the good being valued.1In particular, it is alleged that respondents are not willing to pay more for more of a particular good; in economic jargon, respondents are insensitive to the scope of the good offered in the valuation exercise.2The focus of this debate is not whether CV results showing insensitivity to scope are obtainable, a point readily conceded by CV practitioners, but rather whether this result is generally avoidable with appropriate survey design, pretesting, and administration.

[1]  Berry Ives,et al.  Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements , 1974 .

[2]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection , 1993 .

[3]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[4]  Comparing Expressed and Revealed Preferences for Risk Reduction: Different Hazards and Question Frames , 1988 .

[5]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality , 1985 .

[6]  H. Schuman,et al.  Problems in the Use of Survey Questions to Measure Public Opinion , 1987, Science.

[7]  Paul S. Fischbeck,et al.  Embedding effects: stimulus representation and response mode. , 1993 .

[8]  R. Dunlap,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS AND PROTECTION , 1991 .

[9]  J. Whitehead.  Ex ante willingness to pay with supply and demand uncertainty: implications for valuing a sea turtle protection programme , 1992 .

[10]  Ronald J. Glass,et al.  MEASURING THE EXISTENCE VALUE OF WILDLIFE - WHAT DO CVM ESTIMATES REALLY SHOW , 1991 .

[11]  F. Strack,et al.  Context Effects in Attitude Surveys: Applying Cognitive Theory to Social Research , 1991 .

[12]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability , 1993 .

[13]  D. Brookshire,et al.  Valuing Increments and Decrements in Natural Resource Service Flows , 1980 .

[14]  P. Madden.  A Generalization of Hicksian q Substitutes and Complements with Application to Demand Rationing , 1991 .

[15]  J. Stoll,et al.  Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land , 1985, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[16]  John W. Payne,et al.  Where Do the Numbers Come From? How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions , 1993 .

[17]  J. Payne,et al.  How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation , 1994 .

[18]  James P. Lodge,et al.  Visibility and fine particles , 1991 .

[19]  D. J. Cocheba,et al.  Wildlife valuation: the collective good aspect of hunting. , 1978 .

[20]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Valuing wildlife in benefit‐cost analyses: A case study involving endangered species , 1987 .

[21]  J. Andreoni.  Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  R. Carson,et al.  Valuing the Preservation of Australia's Kakadu Conservation Zone , 1994 .

[23]  Michael A. Kemp,et al.  EXPLORING A BUDGET CONTEXT FOR CONTINGENT VALUATION ESTIMATES , 1993 .

[24]  P. Johansson.  Willingness to pay measures and expectations: an experiment , 1990 .

[25]  M S Thompson,et al.  Willingness to pay and accept risks to cure chronic disease. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[26]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation demand studies, 1968–1988 , 1992 .

[27]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[28]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[29]  W. Pommerehne,et al.  Valuing Reductions of Public Risks: The Case of Hazardous Waste , 1994 .

[30]  Pei-Ing Wu.  Benefit evaluation of multidimensional environmental policy : an application to Ohio's Big Darby Creek / , 1991 .

[31]  Ståle Navrud,et al.  Pricing the European environment , 1992 .

[32]  H. Houthakker,et al.  The effects of rationing on demand elasticities , 1950 .

[33]  V. Smith,et al.  The costs of congestion: An econometric analysis of wilderness recreation , 1976 .

[34]  Glenn C. Blomquist,et al.  Measuring Contingent Values for Wetlands: Effects of Information About Related Environmental Goods , 1991 .

[35]  K. McConnell.  CONGESTION AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY: A STUDY OF BEACH USE , 1977 .

[36]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Contingent valuation and the value of public goods: Reply☆ , 1992 .

[37]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Evaluating the Effect of Alternative Risk Communication Devices on Willingness to Pay: Results from a Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Experiment , 1993 .

[38]  W. Hanemann,et al.  A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting From the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill , 1992 .

[39]  J. Ferris.  Demands for public spending: An attitudinal approach , 1983 .

[40]  Michael Creel,et al.  Comparing benefit estimates from travel cost and contingent valuation using confidence intervals for Hicksian welfare measures , 1991 .

[41]  N. Hatton.  ASKING QUESTIONS , 1979, The Medical journal of Australia.

[42]  John P. Hoehn,et al.  Valuing the Multidimensional Impacts of Environmental Policy: Theory and Methods , 1991 .

[43]  Tom W. Smith.  THAT WHICH WE CALL WELFARE BY ANY OTHER NAME WOULD SMELL SWEETER AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF QUESTION WORDING ON RESPONSE PATTERNS , 1987 .

[44]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Questions and answers in attitude surveys , 1982 .

[45]  G. Harrison.  Valuing public goods with the contingent valuation method: A critique of kahneman and knetsch , 1992 .

[46]  Y. Kaoru.  Differentiating use and nonuse values for coastal pond water quality improvements , 1993, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[47]  J. Bowker,et al.  Estimation of the Nonmarket Benefits of Agricultural Land Retention in Eastern Canada , 1994, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[48]  J. van der Straaten,et al.  Environmental Policy and the Economy , 1991 .

[49]  Perceived scenic beauty and contingent valuation of forest campgrounds. , 1989 .

[50]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Measuring values: A conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility , 1988 .

[51]  Gregory K. Leonard,et al.  Chapter II – Does Contingent Valuation Measure Preferences? Experimental Evidence , 1993 .

[52]  J. Dixon.  Valuation methods and policy making in environmental economics : Henk Folmer and Ekko van Ierland (Editors), Studies in Environmental Science, 36. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989. 259 pp., Dfl.170.00 ISBN 0-444-87382-1 , 1990 .

[53]  J. Mueller,et al.  War, presidents, and public opinion , 1973 .

[54]  C. Propper.  Contingent Valuation of Time Spent on NHS Waiting Lists , 1990 .

[55]  V. Smith,et al.  Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts , 1992 .

[56]  Peter A. Diamond,et al.  Testing the Internal Consistency of Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1996 .

[57]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[58]  Rebecca Lynn Johnson,et al.  Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Issues, Theory, and Applications, Rebecca L. Johnson and Gary V. Johnson, eds. 1990. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. 240 pages. ISBN: 0-8133-7838-9. $32.50 , 1990 .

[59]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-valuation studies. , 1993 .

[60]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? , 1979 .

[61]  Robert A. Young,et al.  Recreational Demands for Maintaining Instream Flows: A Contingent Valuation Approach , 1981 .

[62]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1987 .

[63]  M. Thayer.  Contingent valuation techniques for assessing environmental impacts: Further evidence , 1981 .

[64]  R. G. Walsh,et al.  Congestion and willingness to pay for expansion of skiing capacity. , 1983 .

[65]  F. Gramlich.  THE DEMAND FOR CLEAN WATER: THE CASE OF THE CHARLES RIVER , 1977, National Tax Journal.

[66]  The Economic Value of Wilderness Areas: An Application to the Krutilla-Fisher Model to Scotland's ‘Flow Country’ , 1991 .

[67]  J. Mueller,et al.  Policy and opinion in the Gulf War , 1996 .

[68]  J. Loomis.  Balancing public trust resources of Mono Lake and Los Angeles' Water Right: An economic approach , 1987 .

[69]  J. Andreoni.  IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS: A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING* , 1990 .

[70]  K. Barrick,et al.  Magnitude and distribution of option value for the Washakie Wilderness, northwest Wyoming, USA , 1990 .

[71]  R. Young,et al.  Option Value: Empirical Evidence from a Case Study of Recreation and Water Quality , 1981 .

[72]  Paul A. Samuelson,et al.  Altruism as a problem involving group versus individual selection in economics and biology , 1993 .

[73]  G. Katona,et al.  The Art of Asking Questions , 1951 .