Are big basins just the sum of small catchments?

Many challenges remain in extending our understanding of how hydrologic processes within small catchments scale to larger river basins. In this study we examine how low-flow runoff varies as a function of basin scale at 11 catchments, many of which are nested, in the 176 km2 Neversink River watershed in the Catskill Mountains of New York. Topography, vegetation, soil and bedrock structure are similar across this river basin, and previous research has demonstrated the importance of deep groundwater springs for maintaining low-flow stream discharge at small scales in the basin. Therefore, we hypothesized that deep groundwater would contribute an increasing amount to low-flow discharge as basin scale increased, resulting in increased runoff. Instead, we find that, above a critical basin size of 8 to 21 km2, low-flow runoff is similar within the Neversink watershed. These findings are broadly consistent with those of a previous study that examined stream chemistry as a function of basin scale for this watershed. However, we find physical evidence of self-similarity among basins greater than 8 km2, whereas the previous study found gradual changes in stream chemistry among basins greater than 3 km2. We believe that a better understanding of self-similarity and the subsurface flow processes that affect stream runoff will be attained through simultaneous consideration of both chemical and physical evidence. We also suggest that similar analyses of stream runoff in other basins that represent a range of spatial scales, geomorphologies and climate conditions will further elucidate the issue of scaling of hydrologic processes. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. E. Rantz,et al.  Measurement and computation of streamflow , 1982 .

[2]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Estimation of baseflow residence times in watersheds from the runoff hydrograph recession: method and application in the Neversink watershed, Catskill Mountains, New York , 2002 .

[3]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  The role of event water, a rapid shallow flow component, and catchment size in summer stormflow , 1999 .

[4]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Scaling in hydrology , 2001 .

[5]  Subsurface runoff characteristics from a forest hillslope soil profile including macropores, Hitachi Ohta, Japan , 2001 .

[6]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Investigating the representative elementary area concept: An approach based on field data , 1995 .

[7]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Morphological Characteristics of Macropores and the Distribution of Preferential Flow Pathways in a Forested Slope Segment , 1999 .

[8]  G. Lovett,et al.  Controls of stream chemistry and fish populations in the Neversink watershed, Catskill Mountains, New York , 2001 .

[9]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  ON THE REPRESENTATIVE ELEMENTARY AREA (REA) CONCEPT AND ITS UTILITY FOR DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELLING , 1995 .

[10]  G. G. Parker,et al.  Water resources of the Delaware River basin , 1964 .

[11]  David M. Wolock,et al.  Effects of Subbasin Size on Topographic Characteristics and Simulated Flow Paths in Sleepers River Watershed, Vermont , 1995 .

[12]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Stormflow generation in steep forested headwaters: a linked hydrogeomorphic paradigm , 2000 .

[13]  Ian Cordery,et al.  Effects of catchment size on runoff relationships , 1982 .

[14]  R. Lumia,et al.  Water resources data, New York, water year 1994, volume 1, eastern New York, excluding Long Island , 1995 .

[15]  A. Pearce Streamflow Generation Processes: An Austral View , 1990 .

[16]  M. A. Horn,et al.  Ground Water Atlas of the United States: Segment 11, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia , 1997 .

[17]  Keith Beven,et al.  Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling , 1988 .

[18]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Controls on old and new water contributions to stream flow at some nested catchments in Vermont, USA , 2002 .

[19]  D. Wolock,et al.  Effects of basin size on low‐flow stream chemistry and subsurface contact time in the Neversink River watershed, New York , 1997 .

[20]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments , 1995 .

[21]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  On the relationships between catchment scale and streamwater mean residence time , 2003 .

[22]  C. Kendall,et al.  Determination of hydrologic pathways during snowmelt for alpine/subalpine basins, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado , 2000 .

[23]  Peter S. Murdoch,et al.  Effect of groundwater springs on NO3− concentrations during summer in Catskill Mountain streams , 1998 .

[24]  M. Sivapalan Process complexity at hillslope scale, process simplicity at the watershed scale: is there a connection? , 2003 .

[25]  Ying Fan,et al.  On the concept of a representative elementary area in catchment runoff , 1995 .

[26]  K. Beven,et al.  Similarity and scale in catchment storm response , 1990 .