Flight Deck Interval Management Delegated Separation Using Equivalent Visual Operations

The Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) concept termed, “Equivalent Visual Operations” (EVO) represents a fundamentally different operational approach to current issues confronting commercial aviation. Synthetic and enhanced flight vision system (S/EVS) technologies are critical enabling technologies to EVO. Research was conducted that evaluated concepts for flight-deck-based interval management operations, integrated with S/EVS. One of the concepts tested involves delegated flight-deck-based separation, in which the flight crews were paired with another aircraft and responsible for spacing and maintaining separation from the paired aircraft termed “equivalent visual separation.” The operation required the flight crews to acquire and maintain an “equivalent visual contact” as well as to conduct manual landings in low-visibility conditions utilizing S/EVS and other flight deck technologies. The article describes results that evaluated the concept of EVO delegated separation, including an off-nominal scenario in which the lead aircraft was not able to conform to the assigned spacing resulting in a loss of separation. The results demonstrated that delegated separation improved flight deck situation awareness without an increase in mental workload. Implications for NextGen and future research directions are described.

[1]  Eric Hoffman,et al.  Operational concepts for limited delegation of separation assurance to the cockpit , 1999 .

[2]  David J. Wing,et al.  Human in the Loop Simulation Measures of Pilot Response Delay in a Self-Separation Concept of Operations , 2010 .

[3]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Airport Arrival Capacity Benefits Due to Improved Scheduling Accuracy , 2005 .

[4]  Steven Lang,et al.  Progress on an ICAO Wake Turbulence Re-Categorization Effort , 2010 .

[5]  Ronald L Stroup NextGen : bridging operations to benefits , 2010 .

[6]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Fusion of Synthetic and Enhanced Vision for All-Weather Commercial Aviation Operations , 2007 .

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Synthetic Vision Systems: The Effects of Guidance Symbology, Display Size, and Field of View , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[8]  T. Schnell,et al.  Terrain awareness & pathway guidance for head-up displays (tapguide); a simulator study of pilot performance , 2003, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2003. DASC '03. The 22nd.

[9]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  Mark G. Ballin,et al.  An analysis of landing rates and separations at the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport , 1996 .

[11]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Evaluating the Effects of Dimensionality in Advanced Avionic Display Concepts for Synthetic Vision Systems , 2009 .

[12]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Enhanced vision for all-weather operations under NextGen , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Evaluation of Airborne Precision Spacing in a Human-in-the-Loop Experiment , 2005 .

[14]  Ronald Verhoeven,et al.  Time-based navigation and ASAS interval managed CDA procedures , 2009 .

[15]  Dan Ivanescu,et al.  Effect of aircraft self-merging in sequence on an airborne collision avoidance system , 2004 .

[16]  M. Domaratzki,et al.  Trajectory-based operations , 2004 .

[17]  M. Narkus-Kramer,et al.  Cockpit display of traffic information (CDTI) enhanced flight rules (CEFR) , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[18]  Dan Ivanescu,et al.  ANALYSIS OF CONSTANT TIME DELAY AIRBORNE SPACING BETWEEN AIRCRAFT OF MIXED TYPES IN VARYING WIND CONDITIONS , 2003 .

[19]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  CFIT prevention using synthetic vision , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[20]  S. G. Corps Airbus A320 Side Stick and Fly By Wire — An Update , 1986 .

[21]  Jens Schiefele,et al.  Human factors flight trial analysis for 3D SVS: part II , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[22]  Gary W. Lohr,et al.  Evaluation of Operational Procedures for Using a Time-Based Airborne Inter-arrival Spacing Tool , 2002 .

[23]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Comparison of Airborne and Ground-Based Function Allocation Concepts for NextGen Using Human-In-The-Loop Simulations , 2010 .

[24]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Airborne-Managed Spacing in Multiple Arrival Streams , 2004 .

[25]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Operational Concept for Flight Crews to Participate in Merging and Spacing of Aircraft , 2006 .

[26]  James M Hallock,et al.  Is the B757 Really a "Heavy" Aircraft? , 2007 .

[27]  Stephen M Alvania NextGen : let's talk , 2010 .

[28]  D. Ballinger,et al.  Changes in roles/responsibilities of Air Traffic Control under precision taxiing , 2007, 2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[29]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Fast-Time Evaluations of Airborne Merging and Spacing in Terminal Arrival Operations , 2005 .

[30]  Sharon D Manning,et al.  A moveable view , 2007 .

[31]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Enhanced and synthetic vision for terminal maneuvering area NextGen operations , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[32]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Flight testing an integrated synthetic vision system , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[33]  Eric Hoffman,et al.  Impact of delegation of spacing tasks on safety issues [ATC] , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[34]  Nelson M. Guerreiro,et al.  Characterizing a Wake-free Safe Zone for the Simplified Aircraft-based Paired Approach Concept , 2010 .

[35]  Gordon Hardy,et al.  Comparison of manual and autopilot breakout maneuvers with three closely spaced parallel runway approaches , 2009, 2009 IEEE/AIAA 28th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[36]  Fred George SYNTHETIC VISION SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[37]  Bryan E. Barmore,et al.  Simulation Results for Airborne Precision Spacing along Continuous Descent Arrivals , 2008 .

[38]  Anand Mundra,et al.  Air ground collaboration through delegated separation: Results of simulations for arrivals to closely spaced parallel runways , 2011, 2011 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings.

[39]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Simulation evaluation of synthetic vision as an enabling technology for equivalent visual operations , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[40]  Savita Verma,et al.  Evaluation of Triple Closely Spaced Parallel Runway Procedures for Off-nominal Cases , 2009 .

[41]  Anand Mundra,et al.  Air ground collaboration through delegated separation: Application for departures and arrivals , 2010, 2010 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings.

[42]  Ana Del Amo,et al.  Controlled Time-of-Arrival Flight Trials Results and Analysis , 2009 .

[43]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Enhanced/synthetic vision and head-worn display technologies for terminal maneuvering area NextGen operations , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[44]  Erich C Parker,et al.  A new approach to measuring the effect of weather on NAS performance , 2010 .

[45]  K. Lemos,et al.  Synthetic vision systems: human performance assessment of the influence of terrain density and texture , 2003, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2003. DASC '03. The 22nd.

[46]  Mark Lacagnina Safety at eye level , 2010 .

[47]  Savita Verma,et al.  Preliminary Guidelines on Controller’s Procedures for Pairing Aircraft for Simultaneous Approaches under Different Levels of Automation , 2010 .

[48]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Comparison of Ground-Based and Airborne Function Allocation Concepts for NextGen Using Human-In-The-Loop Simulations , 2010 .

[49]  Kim-Phuong L. Vu,et al.  Pilot and controller workload and situation awareness with three traffic management concepts , 2010, 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[50]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Concept of Operations for Integrated Intelligent Flight Deck Displays and Decision Support Technologies , 2013 .

[51]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Synthetic Vision Enhances Situation Awareness and RNP Capabilities for Terrain-Challenged Approaches , 2003 .

[52]  Yongjin Kwon,et al.  Improved Flight Technical Performance in Flight Decks Equipped With Synthetic Vision Information System Displays , 2004 .