Performance of Selected Agricultural Spray Nozzles using Particle Image Velocimetry

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of nozzle configurations on spray drift and explain the influences using several atomization characteristics (length of spray sheet, spray angle, velocity distribution of flow field, fluctuation of velocity, and droplet size). Nozzles manufactured by one company (Lechler GmbH, Germany) were tested by spraying local tap water in a wind tunnel at an operating pressure of 0.3 MPa and under room temperature. The nozzles tested were compact air-induction flat fan nozzles (IDK120-02, IDK120-03), standard flat fan nozzles (ST110-02, ST110-03), and hollow-cone swirl nozzles (TR80-02, TR80-03). The atomization process was recorded using a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system, droplet size was measured by a Sympatec Helos laser-diffraction particle-size analyzer, and spray drift was evaluated in a wind tunnel with deposition measured using a calibrated fluorometer (Turner-Sequoia model 450). Results showed that spray drift was significantly different among nozzle types (P<0.0005) and that nozzle configurations influenced breakup length, spray angle, droplet size, and velocity. Nozzles producing larger droplet sizes had lower velocity. Smaller droplets were produced when longer and wider spray sheets were produced. Compared to ST and TR nozzles, IDK nozzles started to breakup in the center of the liquid sheet, producing droplets with larger diameter, lower velocity, and less velocity fluctuation. The IDK nozzle is a good choice for low spray drift at higher wind speeds.

[1]  Zbigniew Czaczyk.  INFLUENCE OF AIR FLOW DYNAMICS ON DROPLET SIZE IN CONDITIONS OF AIR-ASSISTED SPRAYERS , 2012 .

[2]  G. Dorr,et al.  农用喷头雾化粒径测试方法比较及分布函数拟合 = Measurement comparison and fitted distribution equation of droplet size for agricultural nozzles , 2014 .

[3]  David Nuyttens,et al.  The Use of High-Speed Imaging Systems for Applications in Precision Agriculture , 2012 .

[4]  Barat Ghobadian,et al.  EFFECT OF ELECTROSTATIC INDUCTION PARAMETERS ON DROPLETS CHARGING FOR AGRICULTURAL APPLICATION , 2009 .

[5]  Mohd Farid Muhamad Said,et al.  Droplet Size Measurement for Liquid Spray using Digital Image Analysis Technique , 2011 .

[7]  Planar Laser Induced Fluorescence (PLIF) Flow Visualization applied to Agricultural Spray Nozzles with Sheet Disintegration; Influence of an Oil -in-Water Emulsion , 2010 .

[8]  A. Lefebvre.  Atomization and Sprays , 1988 .

[9]  Jim Hanan,et al.  Towards a model of spray–canopy interactions: Interception, shatter, bounce and retention of droplets on horizontal leaves , 2014 .

[10]  Zeng Aijun,et al.  Drift mechanism of flat fan nozzle. , 2011 .

[11]  J. Westerweel.  Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry , 1997 .

[12]  C. Tinet,et al.  Characteristics of droplets from single and twin jet air induction nozzles: A preliminary investigation , 2013 .

[13]  M. C. Butler Ellis,et al.  PM—Power and Machinery: Design Factors affecting Spray Characteristics and Drift Performance of Air Induction Nozzles , 2002 .

[14]  John S. Shrimpton,et al.  Two‐Phase Flow Characterization by Automated Digital Image Analysis. Part 2: Application of PDIA for Sizing Sprays , 2004 .

[15]  C. R. Tuck,et al.  The effect of some adjuvants on sprays produced by agricultural flat fan nozzles , 1997 .

[16]  John S. Shrimpton,et al.  A digital image analysis technique for quantitative characterisation of high-speed sprays , 2007 .

[17]  Jim Hanan,et al.  A comparison of initial spray characteristics produced by agricultural nozzles , 2013 .

[18]  E. Hilz,et al.  Spray drift review: The extent to which a formulation can contribute to spray drift reduction , 2013 .

[19]  Bradley K. Fritz,et al.  MEASURING DROPLET SIZE OF AGRICULTURAL SPRAY NOZZLES−MEASUREMENT DISTANCE AND AIRSPEED EFFECTS , 2014 .

[20]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Computer Simulation of Variables that Influence Spray Drift , 1992 .

[21]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Effect of nozzle type, size and pressure on spray droplet characteristics , 2007 .

[22]  C. Tuck,et al.  MEASUREMENTS OF THE DROPLET VELOCITIES IN SPRAYS PRODUCED BY DIFFERENT DESIGNS OF AGRICULTURAL SPRAY NOZZLE , 2008 .

[23]  M. B. Ellis,et al.  Effects of formulation on spray nozzle performance for applications from ground-based boom sprayers , 2000 .

[24]  J. Rothstein,et al.  The atomization of viscoelastic fluids in flat-fan and hollow-cone spray nozzles , 2007 .

[25]  L. Bergström,et al.  Spray drift as influenced by meteorological and technical factors. , 2011, Pest management science.