Variation of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Nepalese Adult Orthodontic Subjects

Introduction: Variations in facial soft tissue thickness have been established previously by studies conducted in different population. Hence, it is essential to obtain facial soft tissue thickness measurement data specific to a population and develop individual standards. The objective of this research is to obtain facial soft tissue thickness data of Nepalese adult male and female subjects seeking orthodontic treatment with different sagittal skeletal malocclusion and evaluate variations in facial soft tissue thickness. Materials & Method: Facial soft tissue thicknesses was measured manually on ninety pretreatment lateral cephalogram at eleven points (Glabella, Nasion, Rhinion, Subnasale, Labrale superius, Stomion, Labrale inferius, Labiomentale, Pogonion,Gnathion and Menton). One-way Analysis of variances [one-way ANOVA] followed by Least significant difference (LSD) post hoc test was used to determine difference in facial soft tissue thickness measurements among three sagittal skeletal group for both sexes. In addition, Student’s t-test was used to find difference in facial soft tissue thickness between the male and female subjects in each skeletal Class. Result: Statistically significant differences were found at points Rhinion, Subnasale, Labrale superius, Stomion and Gnathion in males and at Subnasale, Labrale superius, Stomion and Labrale inferius in females while comparing facial soft tissue thickness among three sagittal skeletal classes. Also, it was observed that mean facial soft tissue thickness was greater for males as compared to female subjects with significant differences at Subnasale, Labrale superius, and Labrale inferius in each skeletal Class. Conclusion: Facial soft tissue thickness varies considerably among different population group, sex and sagittal relationship of jaws.

[1]  A. Abuaffan,et al.  Facial soft tissue thickness in a sample of Sudanese adults with different occlusions. , 2016, Forensic science international.

[2]  Mubassar Fida,et al.  Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Among Three Skeletal Classes in Adult Pakistani Subjects , 2015, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  K. Kibayashi,et al.  Facial soft tissue thickness differences among three skeletal classes in Japanese population. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[4]  Yan Dong,et al.  Influence of sex and body mass index on facial soft tissue thickness measurements of the northern Chinese adult population. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[5]  Aditi Srivastav,et al.  Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a north Indian ethnic population , 2012, Journal of orthodontic science.

[6]  M. Celikoglu,et al.  Facial soft tissue thickness among skeletal malocclusions: is there a difference? , 2012, Korean journal of orthodontics.

[7]  Ayse Canan Yazici,et al.  Facial soft tissue thickness in individuals with different occlusion patterns in adult Turkish subjects. , 2011, Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen.

[8]  M. Yoshino,et al.  Facial soft tissue thickness in Japanese children. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[9]  Mineo Yoshino,et al.  Pilot study of facial soft tissue thickness differences among three skeletal classes in Japanese females. , 2010, Forensic science international.

[10]  D. Vandermeulen,et al.  The influence of sex, age and body mass index on facial soft tissue depths , 2009, Forensic science, medicine, and pathology.

[11]  A. Latif,et al.  Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a South Indian ethnic population. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  T. Uysal,et al.  Determination of Holdaway soft tissue norms in Anatolian Turkish adults. , 2003, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.

[13]  James A McNamara,et al.  Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. , 2002, The Angle orthodontist.

[14]  G. Rasool,et al.  Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns , 2016 .

[15]  A. Hamdan Soft tissue morphology of Jordanian adolescents. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.