Clinical Usefulness of an Oral Moisture Checking Device (Mucus

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors that may influence the results of measurements of oral mucosal moisture using the new oral moisture checking device, especially in relation to the operator and the sensor cover.Methods: Oral mucosal moisture was measured using a new oral moisture checking device (Mucus®). To determine the influence of the operator on the measured values by the oral moisture checking device, 5 operators measured the oral mucosal moisture in 12 subjects. The differences were analyzed using the Friedman test. To determine the influence of the sensor cover, one operator measured the oral mucosal moisture in 12 subjects using two sensor covers. The differences were analyzed by Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test.Results: The result of the Friedman test revealed the absence of any significant influence of the operator on the measured values of oral mucosal moisture by the oral moisture checking device. The results of the Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test revealed that the measured values of oral mucosal moisture by the measuring device differed by about 1.6 % between the two sensor covers (P<0.01).Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that oral mucosal moisture can be measured using the new oral moisture checking device without any inter-operator error. However, there is some possibility of the measured values differing depending on the sensor cover used.

[1]  Fumi Takahashi,et al.  Oral Dryness Examinations : Use of an Oral Moisture Checking Device and a Modified Cotton Method , 2006 .

[2]  史 高橋,et al.  口腔水分計 (モイスチャーチェッカー・ムーカスR) の有用性 , 2005 .

[3]  Linda Lee,et al.  Using the modified Schirmer test to measure mouth dryness: a preliminary study. , 2005, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[4]  Fumi Takahashi,et al.  [The usefulness of an oral moisture checking device (Moisture Checker for Mucus)]. , 2005, Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai zasshi.

[5]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  A simple technique for the determination of salivary gland hypofunction. , 2002, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[6]  J D Walter,et al.  New design for an artificial saliva reservoir for the mandibular complete denture. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  A. Bermejo-Fenoll,et al.  Is there an age-dependent decrease in resting secretion of saliva of healthy persons? A study of 1493 subjects. , 1994, Brazilian dental journal.

[8]  W. Niedermeier,et al.  Salivary secretion and denture retention. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  I. Mandel The role of saliva in maintaining oral homeostasis. , 1989, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  L. Sreebny,et al.  Xerostomia. Part I: Relationship to other oral symptoms and salivary gland hypofunction. , 1988, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[11]  L. Sreebny,et al.  Xerostomia. A neglected symptom. , 1987, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  L. Tabak,et al.  Saliva: a significant factor in removable prosthodontic treatment. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  B. Sonies,et al.  Xerostomia: evaluation of a symptom with increasing significance. , 1985, Journal of the American Dental Association.