Mode of Administration Is Important in US National Estimates of Health-Related Quality of Life
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Steffie Woolhandler,et al. Access to care, health status, and health disparities in the United States and Canada: results of a cross-national population-based survey. , 2006, American journal of public health.
[2] Susan O Griffin,et al. Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis--United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2002. , 2005, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries.
[3] M. Palta,et al. US Norms for Six Generic Health-Related Quality-of-Life Indexes From the National Health Measurement Study , 2007, Medical care.
[4] A. Bowling. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. , 2005, Journal of public health.
[5] Barbara Gandek,et al. How to score version 2 of the SF-12(R) health survey (with a supplement documenting version 1) , 2005 .
[6] Liam B. Quinn,et al. Fast Ethernet , 1997 .
[7] R. Rabin,et al. EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group , 2001, Annals of medicine.
[8] A. K. Taylor,et al. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: a national health information resource. , 1996, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.
[9] P. Dolan,et al. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. , 1997, Medical care.
[10] C. McHorney,et al. Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National Survey , 1994, Medical care.
[11] M. Boyle,et al. Multiattribute and Single‐Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System , 2002, Medical care.
[12] Stephen Joel Coons,et al. US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States: Development and Testing of the D1 Valuation Model , 2005, Medical care.
[13] R. Kobau,et al. Health-related quality of life surveillance--United States, 1993-2002. , 2005, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries.
[14] L. von Essen,et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults: Swedish normative data for the SF-36 and the HADS, and the influence of age, gender, and method of administration , 2006, Health and quality of life outcomes.
[15] Stephen R. Porter,et al. Non-response in student surveys: The Role of Demographics, Engagement and Personality , 2005 .
[16] R A Lyons,et al. SF-36 scores vary by method of administration: implications for study design. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.
[17] M. Gold. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .
[18] A Bowling,et al. Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.
[19] D. Fryback,et al. Report of Nationally Representative Values for the Noninstitutionalized US Adult Population for 7 Health-Related Quality-of-Life Scores , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[20] R W Sanson-Fisher,et al. An examination of self- and telephone-administered modes of administration for the Australian SF-36. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[21] D. Feeny,et al. Does it matter whom and how you ask? inter- and intra-rater agreement in the Ontario Health Survey. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[22] D. Feeny,et al. Self-Reported Health Status of the General Adult U.S. Population as Assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index , 2005, Medical care.
[23] J. Gentleman,et al. Comparing health and health care use in Canada and the United States. , 2006, Health affairs.