Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Strawberry Breeding Program Incorporating DNA-informed Technology

DNA-informed breeding techniques allow breeders to examine individual plants before costly field trials. Previous studies with tree fruits such as apple (Malus ·domestica) and peach (Prunus persica) have identified cost-effective implementation of DNA-informed techniques. However, it is unclear whether breeding programs for herbaceous perennials with 1to 2-year juvenile phases benefit economically from these techniques. In this study, a cost-benefit analysis examining marker-assisted selection (MAS) in a Pacific northwest U.S. strawberry (Fragaria ·ananassa) breeding program was conducted to elucidate the effectiveness of DNA-informed breeding in perennial crops and explore the capabilities of a decision support tool. Procedures and associated costs were identified to create simulations of the breeding program. Simulations compared a conventional breeding program to a breeding program using MAS with low (12.5%), medium (25%), and high (50%) removal rates, and examined different scenarios where MAS had diminishing power to remove individuals as selections reenter the breeding cycle as parentmaterial.We found thatMAS application under current costs was not cost-effective in the modeled strawberry program when applied at the greenhouse stage, but cost-effectiveness was observed when MAS was applied at the end of the seedling trials before clonal trials with a removal rate of 12.5%.

[1]  P. Miklas,et al.  Marker-Assisted Selection , 2005 .

[2]  K. Dreher,et al.  Money matters (II): costs of maize inbred line conversion schemes at CIMMYT using conventional and marker-assisted selection , 2003, Molecular Breeding.

[3]  K. Dreher,et al.  Money matters (I): costs of field and laboratory procedures associated with conventional and marker-assisted maize breeding at CIMMYT , 2003, Molecular Breeding.

[4]  J. Luby,et al.  Does marker-assisted selection make dollars and sense in a fruit breeding program? , 2001 .

[5]  B. Frey,et al.  Efficient low-cost DNA extraction and multiplex fluorescent PCR method for marker-assisted selection in breeding , 2004 .

[6]  G. Norton,et al.  Economic Impact Analysis of Marker-Assisted Breeding for Tolerance to Salinity and Phosphorous Deficiency in Rice , 2009 .

[7]  N. Cogan,et al.  Cost analysis of the application of marker-assisted selection in potato breeding , 2013, Molecular Breeding.

[8]  V. Whitaker.  Applications of molecular markers in strawberry , 2011 .

[9]  J. Dudley,et al.  Comparing Conventional Early Generation Selection with Molecular Marker Assisted Selection in Maize , 1994 .

[10]  F. Mourgues,et al.  STRAWBERRY BREEDING AND VARIETIES: SITUATION AND PERSPECTIVES , 2002 .

[11]  Guoyou Ye,et al.  Genetic and Economic Analysis of a Targeted Marker-assisted Wheat Breeding Strategy , 2005, Molecular Breeding.

[12]  A. Iezzoni,et al.  An Evaluation of U . S . Strawberry Producers Trait Prioritization : Evidence from Audience Surveys , 2014 .

[13]  Chengyan Yue,et al.  A Cost–Benefit Analysis of DNA Informed Apple Breeding , 2019, HortScience.

[14]  Current applications, challenges, and perspectives of marker-assisted seedling selection in Rosaceae tree fruit breeding , 2015, Tree Genetics & Genomes.

[15]  S. Knapp.  Marker-Assisted Selection as a Strategy for Increasing the Probability of Selecting Superior Genotypes , 1998 .

[16]  R. Shoemaker,et al.  Molecular Marker Analysis of Seed Size in Soybean , 2003 .

[17]  C. Peace,et al.  Decision support for cost-efficient and logistically feasible marker-assisted seedling selection in fruit breeding , 2015, Molecular Breeding.