Myocardial Perfusion Scans: Projected Population Cancer Risks From Current Levels of Use in the United States

Background— Myocardial perfusion scans contribute up to 20% of the estimated annual collective radiation dose to the US population. We estimated potential future cancer risk from these scans by age at exposure and current frequency of use in the United States. Methods and Results— Usage patterns were determined from national survey data, and radionuclide dosage was based on current guidelines. Cancer risk projection models were generated on the basis of the National Research Council Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII report, under the assumption that risk has a linear relationship with radiation exposure even at low doses. The mean projected number of radiation-related incident cancers and 95% uncertainty intervals were estimated with the use of Monte Carlo simulations. Estimated risks for a scan performed at age 50 years ranged from 2 cancers per 10 000 scans (95% uncertainty interval, 1 to 5) for a positron emission tomography ammonia-13 test to 25 cancers per 10 000 scans (95% uncertainty interval, 9 to 58) for a dual-isotope (thallium-201 plus technetium-99m) scan. Risks were 50% lower at age 70 years but were similar for men and women. The combination of cancer risk estimates and data on frequency of use suggests that the 9.1 million myocardial perfusion scans performed annually in the United States could result in 7400 (95% uncertainty interval, 3300 to 13 700) additional future cancers. Conclusions— The lifetime cancer risk from a single myocardial perfusion scan is small and should be balanced against likely benefit and appropriateness of the test. The estimates depend on a number of assumptions, including life expectancy. They apply directly to asymptomatic individuals with life expectancies similar to those of the general population. For individuals with a symptomatic clinical profile, on whom such scans are typically performed, the risks will be lower because of shorter life expectancy.

[1]  B. Heinmiller,et al.  The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: Estimates of Radiation-Related Cancer Risks , 2007, Radiation research.

[2]  W. Huda,et al.  Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. , 2008, Radiology.

[3]  D. Berman,et al.  Quantitative analysis of tomographic stress thallium-201 myocardial scintigrams: a multicenter trial. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Mythreyi Bhargavan,et al.  MEDICAL RADIATION EXPOSURE IN THE U.S. IN 2006: PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 2008, Health physics.

[5]  A. Iskandrian,et al.  Prognostic utility of myocardial viability assessment. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  Icrp Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals , 1988 .

[7]  D A Pierce,et al.  Radiation-Related Cancer Risks at Low Doses among Atomic Bomb Survivors , 2000, Radiation research.

[8]  Dale L Preston,et al.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  J. Valentin,et al.  Low-dose extrapolation of radiation-related cancer risk. , 2005, Annals of the ICRP.

[10]  L. Feinendegen,et al.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. , 2009, Radiology.

[11]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in the Elderly , 2009, Circulation.

[12]  J. Valentin Preface, Main Points, Introduction, Chapters 2 and 3 , 2005 .

[13]  Richard Wakeford,et al.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. , 2009, Radiology.

[14]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[15]  C E Land,et al.  Estimating cancer risks from low doses of ionizing radiation. , 1980, Science.

[16]  G Germano,et al.  Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J H Lubin,et al.  Thyroid cancer after exposure to external radiation: a pooled analysis of seven studies. , 1995, Radiation research.

[18]  Richard Doll,et al.  Mortality in relation to smoking: 22 years' observations on female British doctors. , 1980, British medical journal.

[19]  S. Underwood,et al.  The relationship between administered radiopharmaceutical activity in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and imaging outcome , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  G. Stamm,et al.  [CT-expo--a novel program for dose evaluation in CT]. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[21]  D. Berman,et al.  Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  L. Shaw,et al.  Technetium99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging predicts clinical outcome in the community outpatient setting , 2004 .

[23]  Malcolm Crick,et al.  United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) activities and issues , 2011 .

[24]  R. Hendel,et al.  A multicenter assessment of the use of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with appropriateness criteria. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  J. D. Harrison,et al.  Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals , 1988 .

[26]  Albert C. Lardo,et al.  Applications of cardiac multidetector CT beyond coronary angiography , 2009, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[27]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[28]  V. Dilsizian,et al.  PET myocardial perfusion and metabolism clinical imaging , 2009 .

[29]  D. Berman,et al.  The noninvasive prediction of cardiac mortality in men and women with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Study Group. , 1999, The American journal of medicine.

[30]  J. Valentin,et al.  Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: (Addendum 2 to ICRP Publication 53) ICRP Publication 80 Approved by the Commission in September 1997 , 1998, Annals of the ICRP.

[31]  Division on Earth Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[32]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[33]  J. Valentin,et al.  Contents, preface, executive summary, chapters 1 and 2 , 2005 .

[34]  A. Einstein Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare? , 2008, Heart.

[35]  Erik Holmberg,et al.  Radiation Effects on Breast Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Cohorts , 2002, Radiation research.

[36]  D. Broga,et al.  Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States , 2009 .

[37]  H. William Strauss,et al.  Procedure Guideline for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging 3.3* , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[38]  F. L. Lucas,et al.  Temporal Trends in the Utilization of Diagnostic Testing and Treatments for Cardiovascular Disease in the United States, 1993–2001 , 2006, Circulation.

[39]  D. L. Preston,et al.  Solid Cancer Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–1998 , 2007, Radiation research.

[40]  Jim Patton,et al.  A Novel High-Sensitivity Rapid-Acquisition Single-Photon Cardiac Imaging Camera , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  J. Valentin,et al.  Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack , 2005, Annals of the ICRP.

[42]  Nations United sources and effects of ionizing radiation , 2000 .

[43]  J. Knuuti,et al.  EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[44]  Leslee J Shaw,et al.  Technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging predicts clinical outcome in the community outpatient setting. The Nuclear Utility in the Community (NUC) Study. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[45]  J. Stockman,et al.  Mortality in Relation to Smoking: 50 Years' Observations on Male British Doctors , 2006 .

[46]  D. Berman,et al.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Associa , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  H. Nagel,et al.  CT-Expo - ein neuartiges Programm zur Dosisevaluierung in der CT , 2002 .

[48]  K. Weiss,et al.  Definition and estimation of lifetime detriment from radiation exposures: principles and methods. , 1992, Health physics.

[49]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[50]  H R Schelbert,et al.  Procedure guideline for myocardial perfusion imaging. Society of Nuclear Medicine. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.