Influence of tip relief in spur gears dynamic using multibody models with movable teeth

Abstract Tip relief modifications are a common design feature used in industrial practice to reduce dynamic tooth loading, noise, vibrations and wear in high-performance gears. This paper presents a novel implementation of a specific multibody model to include the effect of tip relief micro-modification on spur gears. The model considers every tooth attached to the wheel hub with a revolute joint and an equivalent torsion spring. A penalty formulation is adopted to solve the teeth contact (2D). The proposed methodology offers a trade-off between the accuracy of an equivalent finite element method model and the advantage of reducing the degrees of freedom allowing for fast dynamic simulations. Moreover, there is no need to preliminary predict mesh stiffness or static transmission error as a source of excitation for dynamic simulation, because these are direct outputs of the model simulation given the modified tooth geometry. Model validation is done comparing numerical results with experimental data taken from literature. The effects of geometry modification are studied both in quasi-static and dynamic conditions. Finally, the model has adopted to assess the off-design performance of spur gears.

[1]  Shadi Shweiki,et al.  Combining Finite Element and Multibody Modeling Techniques for Time-Efficient Simulation of Nonlinear Gear Dynamics , 2015 .

[2]  Chang-Wan Kim,et al.  An efficient and robust contact algorithm for a compliant contact force model between bodies of complex geometry , 2009 .

[3]  S. L. Harris,et al.  Dynamic Loads on the Teeth of Spur Gears , 1958 .

[4]  Philippe Velex,et al.  Contribution of Gear Body to Tooth Deflections—A New Bidimensional Analytical Formula , 2004 .

[5]  Fred B. Oswald,et al.  Influence of Tooth Spacing Error on Gears With and Without Profile Modifications , 2000 .

[6]  Wennian Yu,et al.  Analytical modeling of spur gear corner contact effects , 2016 .

[7]  Donald R. Houser,et al.  Mathematical models used in gear dynamics—A review , 1988 .

[8]  Zaigang Chen,et al.  Mesh stiffness calculation of a spur gear pair with tooth profile modification and tooth root crack , 2013 .

[9]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Multibody element for spur and helical gear meshing based on detailed three-dimensional contact calculations , 2013 .

[10]  Ahmet Kahraman,et al.  Effect of Involute Tip Relief on Dynamic Response of Spur Gear Pairs , 1999 .

[11]  Ahmet Kahraman,et al.  Experiments on Nonlinear Dynamic Behavior of an Oscillator With Clearance and Periodically Time-Varying Parameters , 1997 .

[12]  Robert G. Parker,et al.  NON-LINEAR DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF A SPUR GEAR PAIR: MODELLING AND EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISONS , 2000 .

[13]  Domenico Mundo,et al.  Multi-objective micro-geometry optimization of gear tooth supported by response surface methodology , 2017 .

[14]  Wennian Yu,et al.  A Comparison of Several SDOF Models of Gear Dynamics , 2016 .

[15]  A. Kahraman,et al.  Steady state forced response of a mechanical oscillator with combined parametric excitation and clearance type non-linearity , 1995 .

[16]  Yimin Shao,et al.  Dynamic simulation of spur gear with tooth root crack propagating along tooth width and crack depth , 2011 .

[17]  Ettore Pennestrì,et al.  Second-order approximation pseudo-rigid model of flexure hinge with parabolic variable thickness , 2019, Mechanism and Machine Theory.

[18]  Pier Paolo Valentini,et al.  A study of the non-linear dynamic response of spur gear using a multibody contact based model with flexible teeth , 2019, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[19]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Semi-analytic contact technique in a non-linear parametric model order reduction method for gear simulations , 2018 .

[20]  Peter Eberhard,et al.  Rigid-elastic modeling of meshing gear wheels in multibody systems , 2006 .

[21]  Pier Paolo Valentini,et al.  Second-order approximation pseudo-rigid model of leaf flexure hinge , 2017 .

[22]  Sungsoo Rhim,et al.  A general purpose contact algorithm using a compliance contact force model for rigid and flexible bodies of complex geometry , 2013 .

[23]  Wim Desmet,et al.  A nonlinear parametric model reduction method for efficient gear contact simulations , 2015 .

[24]  Ahmet Kahraman,et al.  Experiments on the relationship between the dynamic transmission error and the dynamic stress factor of spur gear pairs , 2013 .

[25]  José I. Pedrero,et al.  Influence of profile modifications on meshing stiffness, load sharing, and trasnsmission error of involute spur gears , 2019, Mechanism and Machine Theory.

[26]  Sungsoo Rhim,et al.  Numerical estimation of dynamic transmission error of gear by using quasi-flexible-body modeling method , 2015 .