T2-Weighted fast MR imaging with true FISP versus HASTE: comparative efficacy in the evaluation of normal fetal brain maturation.

OBJECTIVE This study compares the relative efficacy of two fast T2-weighted MR imaging techniques-fast imaging with steady-state free precession (true FISP) and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE)-in the evaluation of the normal fetal brain maturation during the second and third trimesters of gestation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS The brain maturation of 10 normal nonsedated fetuses (5 during the second trimester and 6 during the third trimester of gestation [1 fetus underwent 2 examinations]) was examined by both techniques using a Vision+ 1.5-T MR system. We specifically looked for developing events, including white matter myelination, neuronal migration, and cortical sulcation. Image quality was graded according to the presence or absence of undesirable blurring. RESULTS The specific absorption rate was lower for true FISP than for HASTE by a factor of 3 at equivalent imaging conditions. HASTE and true FISP provide comparable image quality in the second trimester when myelination of the cerebrum has not begun. Neuronal migration could be recognized as hypodense bands on both sequences during the second trimester. Myelination beginning at the third trimester was better delineated with true FISP than with HASTE because of point spread function-related blurring effects inherent in HASTE that hampered visualization of short-T2 structures. Cortical sulcation was well delineated by both sequences. CONCLUSION With relatively superior image quality and significantly lower radiofrequency absorption than HASTE, true FISP is a safer and more effective alternative in the prenatal evaluation of normal fetal brain.

[1]  R. Vanninen,et al.  MRI does not change fetal cardiotocographic parameters , 1998, Prenatal diagnosis.

[2]  R. Freeman,et al.  Phase and intensity anomalies in fourier transform NMR , 1971 .

[3]  D. Levine,et al.  Cortical maturation in normal and abnormal fetuses as assessed with prenatal MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[4]  R R Edelman,et al.  Fetal fast MR imaging: reproducibility, technical quality, and conspicuity of anatomy. , 1998, Radiology.

[5]  M. Reiser,et al.  Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent , 1997, European Radiology.

[6]  J R MacFall,et al.  Mechanisms of Contrast in NMR Imaging , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  E. T. Tali,et al.  MR of fetal central nervous system abnormalities. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[8]  R. Friede Developmental Neuropathology , 1989, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[9]  R. Friede Gross and Microscopic Development of the Central Nervous System , 1989 .

[10]  P Blot,et al.  Supratentorial parenchyma in the developing fetal brain: in vitro MR study with histologic comparison. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  E M Haacke,et al.  Steady-state free precession imaging in the presence of motion: application for improved visualization of the cerebrospinal fluid. , 1990, Radiology.

[12]  R. Edelman,et al.  Obstetric MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[13]  J Listerud,et al.  First principles of fast spin echo. , 1992, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[14]  T. Crombleholme,et al.  Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. , 1999, JAMA.

[15]  K. Tsuchiya,et al.  Short communication: MR imaging of fetal brain abnormalities using a HASTE sequence. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  J S Lewin,et al.  Invited. Remember true FISP? a high SNR, near 1‐second imaging method for T2‐like contrast in interventional MRI at .2 T , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  A. Hubbard,et al.  Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging enhances fetal diagnosis. , 1998, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[18]  P. Sonigo,et al.  MR imaging of fetal cerebral anomalies , 1998, Pediatric Radiology.

[19]  M Takahashi,et al.  MR imaging of the fetus by a HASTE sequence. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  H. Hricak,et al.  Complex fetal disorders: effect of MR imaging on management--preliminary clinical experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[21]  R R Edelman,et al.  Fetal anatomy revealed with fast MR sequences. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  J C Gore,et al.  The Loss of Small Objects in Variable TE Imaging: Implications for FSE, RARE, and EPI , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Steady-State Magnetizations in Rapid NMR Imaging Using Small Flip Angles and Short Repetition Intervals , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  F. Gilles,et al.  Gyral development of the human brain. , 1977, Annals of Neurology.

[25]  PhD Marjo S. van der Knaap MD,et al.  Magnetic Resonance of Myelin, Myelination, and Myelin Disorders , 1995, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[26]  Sachio Takashima,et al.  Development of myelination in the human fetal and infant cerebrum: A myelin basic protein immunohistochemical study , 1992, Brain and Development.

[27]  Wei Li,et al.  Fetal central nervous system anomalies: MR imaging augments sonographic diagnosis. , 1997, Radiology.

[28]  R. Frydman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus: A study of 20 cases performed without curarization , 1993, Prenatal diagnosis.

[29]  J. Groen,et al.  Fast Field Echo imaging: an overview and contrast calculations. , 1988, Magnetic resonance imaging.