Benefits of in-situ synthesized microarrays for analysis of gene expression in understudied microorganisms.

Although the genome sequences of many microorganisms are now known, whole-genome DNA microarray platforms consisting of PCR amplicon, or oligonucleotide elements printed onto glass slides have been readily available for only a relatively few, highly studied microorganisms. For those microorganisms more recently cultured or studied by fewer investigators it has been difficult to justify the initial time and expense of developing such array platforms especially if only a limited number of gene expression studies are envisioned. However, in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide (ISO) arrays can be inexpensively fabricated on an 'as needed' basis with a reduced initial investment in time, personnel, resources, and costs. To evaluate the performance of one ISO array platform, gene expression patterns in Geobacter sulfurreducens under nitrogen-fixing conditions were compared with results from quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and previously published data from a similar experiment using spotted PCR amplicon arrays. There were strong correlations between the results of the ISO arrays and the results from qRT-PCR (r(2)=0.762) and spotted array (r(2)=0.744) analyses. After initial use the ISO arrays could be successfully stripped and reused. The increased flexibility in array design and reusability coupled with a lower initial investment in terms of fabrication time and cost for the ISO arrays suggest that they may be the preferred approach when investigating gene expression in microorganisms, especially when only a few expression studies are required.

[1]  Alex E. Lash,et al.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  Kelly P. Nevin,et al.  In Situ Expression of nifD in Geobacteraceae in Subsurface Sediments , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[3]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[4]  Allan Walker,et al.  Microbial degradation of organophosphorus compounds. , 2006, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[5]  F. Löffler,et al.  Harnessing microbial activities for environmental cleanup. , 2006, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[6]  P. Xu,et al.  Microbial degradation of sulfur, nitrogen and oxygen heterocycles. , 2006, Trends in microbiology.

[7]  Terry Speed,et al.  Normalization of cDNA microarray data. , 2003, Methods.

[8]  Kia Peyvan,et al.  Fully integrated miniature device for automated gene expression DNA microarray processing. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  R. Lempicki,et al.  Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  David P. Kreil,et al.  Robotic spotting of cDNA and oligonucleotide microarrays. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[11]  Robin H. Liu,et al.  Validation of a fully integrated microfluidic array device for influenza A subtype identification and sequencing. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  Michael G. Barnes,et al.  Experimental comparison and cross-validation of the Affymetrix and Illumina gene expression analysis platforms , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  Kelly P. Nevin,et al.  DNA Microarray Analysis of Nitrogen Fixation and Fe(III) Reduction in Geobacter sulfurreducens , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  Robert A. LaRossa,et al.  Global Impact of sdiA Amplification Revealed by Comprehensive Gene Expression Profiling of Escherichia coli , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  Robin H. Liu,et al.  Integrated microfluidic biochips for DNA microarray analysis , 2006, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[16]  H. Biebl,et al.  Environmental biology of the marine Roseobacter lineage. , 2006, Annual review of microbiology.

[17]  Chang Hee Kim,et al.  Three microarray platforms: an analysis of their concordance in profiling gene expression , 2005, BMC Genomics.

[18]  S. Giovannoni,et al.  Representative Freshwater Bacterioplankton Isolated from Crater Lake, Oregon , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[19]  S. Giovannoni,et al.  Cultivation and Growth Characteristics of a Diverse Group of Oligotrophic Marine Gammaproteobacteria , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  S Rozen,et al.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. , 2000, Methods in molecular biology.

[21]  R. Ye,et al.  Applications of DNA microarrays in microbial systems. , 2001, Journal of microbiological methods.

[22]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  G. King,et al.  Diversity and Structure of Bacterial Chemolithotrophic Communities in Pine Forest and Agroecosystem Soils , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[24]  Ramon Gonzalez,et al.  DNA Microarrays: Experimental Issues, Data Analysis, and Application to Bacterial Systems , 2004, Biotechnology progress.

[25]  Abraham Esteve-Núñez,et al.  Growth of Geobacter sulfurreducens under nutrient-limiting conditions in continuous culture. , 2005, Environmental microbiology.

[26]  Gordon K Smyth,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments , 2011 .

[27]  C. Foo,et al.  Identification of Histoplasma capsulatum transcripts induced in response to reactive nitrogen species. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[28]  Dennis B. Troup,et al.  NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles—database and tools update , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..