Missing depth cues in virtual reality limit performance and quality of three dimensional reaching movements

Background Goal-directed reaching for real-world objects by humans is enabled through visual depth cues. In virtual environments, the number and quality of available visual depth cues is limited, which may affect reaching performance and quality of reaching movements. Methods We assessed three-dimensional reaching movements in five experimental groups each with ten healthy volunteers. Three groups used a two-dimensional computer screen and two groups used a head-mounted display. The first screen group received the typically recreated visual depth cues, such as aerial and linear perspective, occlusion, shadows, and texture gradients. The second screen group received an abstract minimal rendering lacking those. The third screen group received the cues of the first screen group and absolute depth cues enabled by retinal image size of a known object, which realized with visual renderings of the handheld device and a ghost handheld at the target location. The two head-mounted display groups received the same virtually recreated visual depth cues as the second or the third screen group respectively. Additionally, they could rely on stereopsis and motion parallax due to head-movements. Results and conclusion All groups using the screen performed significantly worse than both groups using the head-mounted display in terms of completion time normalized by the straight-line distance to the target. Both groups using the head-mounted display achieved the optimal minimum in number of speed peaks and in hand path ratio, indicating that our subjects performed natural movements when using a head-mounted display. Virtually recreated visual depth cues had a minor impact on reaching performance. Only the screen group with rendered handhelds could outperform the other screen groups. Thus, if reaching performance in virtual environments is in the main scope of a study, we suggest applying a head-mounted display. Otherwise, when two-dimensional screens are used, achievable performance is likely limited by the reduced depth perception and not just by subjects’ motor skills.

[1]  Marc Bolliger,et al.  Robots for Measurement/Clinical Assessment , 2012 .

[2]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Li Li,et al.  The Accuracy and Precision of Position and Orientation Tracking in the HTC Vive Virtual Reality System for Scientific Research , 2017, i-Perception.

[4]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  "If I can't do it once, why do it a hundred times?": Connecting volition to movement success in a virtual environment motivates people to exercise the arm after stroke , 2007, 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[6]  J. Zitzewitz,et al.  A View on VR-Enhanced Rehabilitation Robotics , 2006, 2006 International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation.

[7]  Boris M. Velichkovsky,et al.  The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments - A review , 2013, ACM Comput. Surv..

[8]  K. Krämer,et al.  [Virtual reality in medicine]. , 1995, Der Radiologe.

[9]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-Assisted Arm Assessments in Spinal Cord Injured Patients: A Consideration of Concept Study , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Assessment-driven arm therapy at home using an IMU-based virtual reality system , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[11]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin III --arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation , 2009 .

[12]  Catherine E. Lang,et al.  Translating Animal Doses of Task-Specific Training to People With Chronic Stroke in 1-Hour Therapy Sessions: A Proof-of-Concept Study , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[13]  R. Riener,et al.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[14]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Self-directed arm therapy at home after stroke with a sensor-based virtual reality training system , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  Jacqueline Fagard,et al.  How should “ambidexterity” be estimated? , 2015, Laterality.

[17]  Colin Ware,et al.  The Importance of Stereo and Eye-Coupled Perspective for Eye-Hand Coordination in Fish Tank VR , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Fun and Sports: Enhancing the Home Fitness Experience , 2004, ICEC.

[19]  R. Riener,et al.  Validation of a mechanism to balance exercise difficulty in robot-assisted upper-extremity rehabilitation after stroke , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[20]  V. Dietz,et al.  Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.