C2SI corpus: a database of speech disorder productions to assess intelligibility and quality of life in head and neck cancers

Within the framework of the Carcinologic Speech Severity Index (C2SI) INCa Project, we collected a large database of French speech recordings aiming at validating Disorder Severity Indexes. Such a database will be useful for measuring the impact of oral and pharyngeal cavity cancer on speech production. It will permit to assess patients’ quality of life after treatment. The database is composed of audio recordings from 134 sessions and associated metadata. Several intelligibility and comprehensibility levels of speech functions have been evaluated. Acoustics and prosody have been assessed. Perceptual evaluation rates from both naive and expert juries are being produced. Automatic analyzes are being carried out. It is intended to provide speech therapists and physicians with objective tools, which take into account the intelligibility and comprehensibility of patients which received cancer treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy). The aim of this paper is to justify the necessity of such a corpus and to present its data collection. This C2SI corpus will be available to the scientific community through the Scientific Interest Group Parolothèque.

[1]  E. Bard,et al.  Structural Influences on Initial Accent Placement in French , 2007, Language and speech.

[2]  Assessment of impairment of intelligibility and of speech signal after oral cavity and oropharynx cancer. , 2019, European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases.

[3]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[4]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[5]  J. Rieger,et al.  Methods of functional outcomes assessment following treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancer: review of the literature. , 2008, Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale.

[6]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Auditory illusions and confusions. , 1970, Scientific American.

[7]  Jean-Pierre Martens,et al.  Robust automatic intelligibility assessment techniques evaluated on speakers treated for head and neck cancer , 2014, Comput. Speech Lang..

[8]  T. Jones,et al.  Speech and voice outcomes in oropharyngeal cancer and evaluation of the University of Washington Quality of Life speech domain , 2009, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[9]  L. Sobin,et al.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours , 1987, UICC International Union Against Cancer.

[10]  R. D. de Haan,et al.  Handicap questionnaires: what do they assess? , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  Neil K. Aaronson,et al.  Speech Handicap Index in patients with oral and pharyngeal cancer: Better understanding of patients' complaints , 2008, Head & neck.

[12]  Anne Lacheret,et al.  On-line Processing of Pop-Out Words in Spoken French Dialogues , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  V. Woisard,et al.  [Validation of a self assessment for speech disorders (Phonation Handicap Index)]. , 2009, Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie.

[14]  A. Ghio,et al.  De l'intelligibilité à la compréhensibilité de la parole, quelles mesures en pratique clinique ? , 2013 .

[15]  K. Harrington,et al.  First report on the reliability and validity of speech handicap index in native English‐speaking patients with head and neck cancer , 2010, Head & neck.

[16]  A. Samuel Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Comprehension of natural and synthetic speech: effects of predictability on the verification of sentences controlled for intelligibility. , 1987, Computer speech & language.

[18]  Johannes A Langendijk,et al.  Quality of life after surgical treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a prospective longitudinal assessment of patients reconstructed by a microvascular flap. , 2007, Oral oncology.

[19]  Paul M. Evitts,et al.  Effect of Dysphonia and Cognitive-Perceptual Listener Strategies on Speech Intelligibility. , 2020, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[20]  Corinne Fredouille,et al.  How to manage sound, physiological and clinical data of 2500 dysphonic and dysarthric speakers? , 2012, Speech Commun..

[21]  Arthur G. Samuel,et al.  Phonemic Restoration: Insights From a New Methodology , 1981 .