Driver’s Performance Under Different Secondary Tasks and Disruptions on Rural Road Environment

Nowadays, detection of driver’s fatigue is a major concern in vehicle design, road safety and transportation research. Driving tasks requires full attention from the drivers while operating the vehicle. Occasionally, drivers are exposed to perform other activities such as talking to a passenger and using an in-vehicle technology or phone which is known as secondary task while driving. Thus, this study aims to analyse the driver’s performance via three types of physiological measurements in a simulated condition. An integrated approach by combining subjective and objective methods were used in this study. There are Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Heart Rate (HR). Twelve participants were recruited to evaluate their responses towards different types of secondary tasks and disruptions in 25-minutes of driving duration. The findings showed that there are differences in physiological responses for this driving session. Beta Activity shows higher event-related power modulation values from start until the end of the driving session. In conclusion, the type of disruption during driving and secondary tasks shows different findings towards driver driving performances. This study can be used as reference to drivers and related agencies by taking into account the physiological effects of driver’s performance based on different secondary tasks and disruptions while driving.

[1]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Inattention and distraction in fatal road crashes - Results from in-depth crash investigations in Norway. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The prevalence of and crash risk associated with primarily cognitive secondary tasks , 2019, Safety Science.

[3]  Luigi Cinque,et al.  Self-induced emotions as alternative paradigm for driving brain–computer interfaces , 2018, Comput. methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis..

[4]  Dieter Zapf,et al.  Effectiveness and user acceptance of infotainment-lockouts: A driving simulator study , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[5]  Nadja Schömig,et al.  Secondary task engagement and disengagement in the context of highly automated driving , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[6]  Nilanjan Sarkar,et al.  EEG-Based Affect and Workload Recognition in a Virtual Driving Environment for ASD Intervention , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Bo Wang,et al.  Crashes and near-crashes on horizontal curves along rural two-lane highways: Analysis of naturalistic driving data. , 2017, Journal of safety research.

[8]  Narges Khanjani,et al.  An observational study of secondary task engagement while driving on urban streets in Iranian Safe Communities. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Miyoung Kim,et al.  Driver drowsiness detection using the in-ear EEG , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[10]  Alexandra Neukum,et al.  Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation - comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment , 2016 .

[11]  Jonathan M Hankey,et al.  Creation of the Naturalistic Engagement in Secondary Tasks (NEST) distracted driving dataset. , 2015, Journal of safety research.

[12]  Yassierli,et al.  The Effectiveness of In-vehicle Peppermint Fragrance to Maintain Car Driver's Alertness , 2015 .

[13]  Yulan Liang,et al.  The Effects of Visual and Cognitive Distractions on Operational and Tactical Driving Behaviors , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[14]  S. Dawal,et al.  The Effects of Driving Environment on the Mental Workload of Train Drivers , 2013 .

[15]  Hany M. Hassan,et al.  Exploring the safety implications of young drivers' behavior, attitudes and perceptions. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Tim Horberry,et al.  Effects of advertising billboards during simulated driving. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  Dick de Waard,et al.  Monitoring drivers' mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  SzeSeen Kee,et al.  Driving Fatigue and Performance among Occupational Drivers in Simulated Prolonged Driving , 2010 .

[19]  Tamitza Toroyan,et al.  Global status report on road safety , 2009, Injury Prevention.

[20]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Ergonomics Society of the Human Factors and Human Factors: The Journal , 2022 .

[21]  Normand Teasdale,et al.  Mental workload when driving in a simulator: effects of age and driving complexity. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Drew Dawson,et al.  Perception of simulated driving performance after sleep restriction and caffeine. , 2007, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[23]  Pilar Tejero,et al.  Rear-view mirror use, driver alertness and road type: an empirical study using EEG measures , 2006 .

[24]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  W. Godwin Article in Press , 2000 .

[26]  U. Sekaran,et al.  Research Methods for Business : A Skill Building Approach (5th Edition) , 1992 .

[27]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.