Intervertebral Motion After Incremental Damage to the Posterior Structures of the Cervical Spine

Study Design. Compare intervertebral motion after incremental damage to posterior cervical structures in whole cadavers to motion in asymptomatic subjects. Objective. Determine if damage to the posterior structures of the cervical spine can be detected by quantitative analysis of flexion-extension radiographs. Summary of Background Data. Simulated damage to the posterior structures of the cervical spine can change intervertebral motion, if intervertebral motion before damage is known. It is not known if intervertebral motion measured from flexion-extension radiographs can be used to detect damage to the posterior structures if motion before damage is not known. Methods. Incremental injury to posterior ligaments and facet joints was simulated in 12 whole cadavers. Intervertebral motion was measured from flexion-extension images using validated and clinically applicable software. Measurements were compared to previously published measurements for asymptomatic subjects. Results. Extensive damage could be simulated in all the cervical spines without intervertebral motion exceeding the 95% confidence limits for asymptomatic subjects. After sectioning all posterior ligaments, destroying both facet joints, and then sectioning the posterior longitudinal ligaments, intervertebral motion exceeded the 95% confidence intervals in 69% of the cadavers. Intervertebral shear decreased with incremental damage to posterior structures. Conclusions. Radiographic assessment of the cervical spine may not be sufficient to exclude even extensive damage to the posterior structures of the cervical spine.

[1]  M. Todd,et al.  Segmental cervical spine motion during orotracheal intubation of the intact and injured spine with and without external stabilization. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  H N Herkowitz,et al.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Cervical Laminaplasty and Cervical Laminectomy with Progressive Facetectomy , 1993, Spine.

[3]  A. Aho,et al.  Segmentary antero-posterior mobility of the cervical spine. , 1955, Annales medicinae internae Fenniae.

[4]  Bhalla Sk,et al.  Normal ranges of intervertebral-joint motion of the cervical spine. , 1969 .

[5]  Wolfgang Frobin,et al.  Increased Sagittal Plane Segmental Motion in the Lower Cervical Spine in Women With Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders, Grades I–II: A Case-Control Study Using a New Measurement Protocol , 2003, Spine.

[6]  V. Goel,et al.  An in-vitro study of the kinematics of the normal, injured and stabilized cervical spine. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  Development of a System for In Vitro Neck Muscle Force Replication in Whole Cervical Spine Experiments , 2001, Spine.

[8]  S. Mercer,et al.  Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Cervical spine mechanics as a function of transection of components. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  R Vanderby,et al.  Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  E H Simmons,et al.  Normal ranges of intervertebral-joint motion of the cervical spine. , 1969, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[12]  C. Granger,et al.  Satisfaction With Medical Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury , 2004, Spine.

[13]  M M Panjabi,et al.  The onset and progression of spinal injury: a demonstration of neutral zone sensitivity. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  J. Dvorak,et al.  In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  P Brinckmann,et al.  Sagittal plane segmental motion of the cervical spine. A new precision measurement protocol and normal motion data of healthy adults. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  D. Grob,et al.  Clinical Validation of Functional Flexion/Extension Radiographs of the Cervical Spine , 1993, Spine.

[17]  C. Reitman,et al.  Changes in Segmental Intervertebral Motion Adjacent to Cervical Arthrodesis: A Prospective Study , 2004, Spine.

[18]  J. M. Ziegler,et al.  Intervertebral Motion Between Flexion and Extension in Asymptomatic Individuals , 2004, Spine.

[19]  Ronald P. McCabe,et al.  Cervical Stability After Sequential Capsule Resection , 1993, Spine.

[20]  A. White,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  J. J. Santin,et al.  Three-dimensional biomechanical properties of the human cervical spine in vitro , 1993, European Spine Journal.

[22]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  A Method to Simulate In Vivo Cervical Spine Kinematics Using In Vitro Compressive Preload , 2002, Spine.

[23]  K. Kaneda,et al.  Dynamic motion analysis of normal and unstable cervical spines using cineradiography. An in vivo study. , 1999, Spine.

[24]  C A Van Ee,et al.  Quantifying skeletal muscle properties in cadaveric test specimens: effects of mechanical loading, postmortem time, and freezer storage. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  M. Panjabi,et al.  An anatomic basis for spinal instability: A porcine trauma model , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[26]  L. Claes,et al.  Load-displacement properties of the normal and injured lower cervical spine in vitro , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[27]  W. Hayes,et al.  Cervical injuries under flexion and compression loading. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.

[28]  R. Lin,et al.  Characteristics of Sagittal Vertebral Alignment in Flexion Determined by Dynamic Radiographs of the Cervical Spine , 2001, Spine.