Open-Loop Power Adaptation in Nanosensor Networks for Chemical Reactors

Due to their extremely small form factor, wireless nanosensor networks (WNSNs) have the potential to monitor and control chemical processes right at the molecule level lifting the process efficiency to a level not possible with conventional methods. However, sensor networking within a chemical reactor is challenging due to its time-varying chemical composition, which creates a time-varying radio channel. The nanosensors therefore need to continuously adapt their transmission power according to the chemical composition while maintaining a low overall power budget. We show that this problem can be modeled as a Markov decision process (MDP). However, the MDP solution requires the sensors to know the composition of the reactor at each time instance, which is difficult to realize due to computation and communication constraints at the nanoscale. We therefore choose to use open-loop methods for power adaptation, which allows nanosensors to dynamically adjust their powers based on a policy derived entirely from offline analysis of the expected channel variation over time. Using extensive simulations, we evaluate the performance of the proposed open-loop power adaptation method for improving the efficiency of a widely deployed gas-to-liquid conversion process known as Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis. We find that the proposed method performs close to optimal achieving a three fold improvement in FT efficiency with only a 100 femto watt power consumption on average for the nanosensor communications. In terms of maximum achievable process efficiency, our method outperforms the previously proposed open-loop power adaptation policy by 30% and the nonadaptive power allocation by 52%.

[1]  Michael A. Gibson,et al.  Efficient Exact Stochastic Simulation of Chemical Systems with Many Species and Many Channels , 2000 .

[2]  Eytan Modiano,et al.  Dynamic power allocation and routing for time varying wireless networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[3]  E. R. Polovtseva,et al.  The HITRAN2012 molecular spectroscopic database , 2013 .

[4]  Mahbub Hassan,et al.  Design and Analysis of a Wireless Nanosensor Network for Monitoring Human Lung Cells , 2015, BODYNETS.

[5]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Channel Modeling and Capacity Analysis for Electromagnetic Wireless Nanonetworks in the Terahertz Band , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[6]  Mahbub Hassan,et al.  Remote Detection of Chemical Reactions using Nanoscale Terahertz Communication Powered by Pyroelectric Energy Harvesting , 2015, NANOCOM.

[7]  Albert Cabellos-Aparicio,et al.  Time- and Frequency-Domain Analysis of Molecular Absorption in Short-Range Terahertz Communications , 2015, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[8]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Electromagnetic wireless nanosensor networks , 2010, Nano Commun. Networks.

[9]  Gang Li,et al.  The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database , 2005 .

[10]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Graphene-based plasmonic nano-transceiver for terahertz band communication , 2014, The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014).

[11]  Christian Falconi,et al.  Wireless Joule nanoheaters , 2007 .

[12]  Urbashi Mitra,et al.  Sensor Selection and Power Allocation for Distributed Estimation in Sensor Networks: Beyond the Star Topology , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Albert Renken,et al.  Microstructured Catalytic Reactors , 2010 .

[14]  F. Zeng,et al.  Fully room-temperature-fabricated nonvolatile resistive memory for ultrafast and high-density memory application. , 2009, Nano letters.

[15]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Channel Capacity of Electromagnetic Nanonetworks in the Terahertz Band , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[16]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Nanonetworks: A new communication paradigm , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[17]  Mahbub Hassan,et al.  Power Optimization in Nano Sensor Networks for Chemical Reactors , 2014, NANOCOM' 14.

[18]  D. A. Stuart,et al.  Towards advanced chemical and biological nanosensors-An overview. , 2005, Talanta.

[19]  José Luis Valverde,et al.  Cobalt and iron supported on carbon nanofibers as catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis , 2014 .

[20]  G. V. D. Laan,et al.  Kinetics and Selectivity of the Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: A Literature Review , 1999 .

[21]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[22]  Sayyed Faramarz Tayyari,et al.  Fischer-Tropsch synthesis by nanostructured iron catalyst , 2010 .

[23]  Adesoji A. Adesina,et al.  Hydrocarbon synthesis via Fischer-Tropsch reaction: travails and triumphs , 1996 .

[24]  D. Gillespie A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation , 1992 .

[25]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Femtosecond-Long Pulse-Based Modulation for Terahertz Band Communication in Nanonetworks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[26]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Innovative Approach to Improving Gas-to-Liquid Fuel Catalysis via Nanosensor Network Modulation , 2014 .

[27]  Ramalingam Sridhar,et al.  High speed robust current sense amplifier for nanoscale memories: a winner take all approach , 2006, 19th International Conference on VLSI Design held jointly with 5th International Conference on Embedded Systems Design (VLSID'06).

[28]  Joseph Naor,et al.  Dynamic Power Allocation Under Arbitrary Varying Channels—An Online Approach , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[29]  Peng Zhai,et al.  Iron oxide nanoparticles supported on pyrolytic graphene oxide as model catalysts for Fischer Tropsch synthesis , 2013 .

[30]  Fuqin Xiong,et al.  M-ary energy detection of a Gaussian FSK UWB system , 2014, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[31]  Dale Teeters,et al.  Investigation of lithium battery nanoelectrode arrays and their component nanobatteries , 2005 .

[32]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Stability properties of constrained queueing systems and scheduling policies for maximum throughput in multihop radio networks , 1990, 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[33]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Optimal Power Allocation for Distributed Detection Over MIMO Channels in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[34]  Mahbub Hassan,et al.  Frequency hopping strategies for improving terahertz sensor network performance over composition varying channels , 2014, Proceeding of IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks 2014.

[35]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Directed diffusion for wireless sensor networking , 2003, TNET.

[36]  Long Lin,et al.  Pyroelectric nanogenerators for harvesting thermoelectric energy. , 2012, Nano letters.

[37]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Nano sensor networks for tailored operation of highly efficient gas-to-liquid fuels catalysts , 2013 .

[38]  Dale Teeters,et al.  Characterization of lithium nanobatteries and lithium battery nanoelectrode arrays that benefit from nanostructure and molecular self-assembly , 2006 .

[39]  Michael Kearns,et al.  Near-Optimal Reinforcement Learning in Polynomial Time , 2002, Machine Learning.

[40]  Klaus Stöwe,et al.  High-throughput syntheses of nano-scaled mixed metal sulphides , 2011 .

[41]  Ying Liang,et al.  A simple preparation of carbon and nitrogen co-doped nanoscaled TiO2 with exposed {0 0 1} facets for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity , 2013 .

[42]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Performance analysis of communications networks and systems , 2006 .

[43]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Nano-scale sensor networks for chemical catalysis , 2013, 2013 13th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO 2013).

[44]  Yishay Mansour,et al.  A Sparse Sampling Algorithm for Near-Optimal Planning in Large Markov Decision Processes , 1999, Machine Learning.

[45]  Zhong Lin Wang Energy harvesting for self-powered nanosystems , 2008 .

[46]  J. M. Jornet,et al.  Joint Energy Harvesting and Communication Analysis for Perpetual Wireless Nanosensor Networks in the Terahertz Band , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[47]  Jing Guo,et al.  Comparison of performance limits for carbon nanoribbon and carbon nanotube transistors , 2006 .

[48]  Joel Villatoro,et al.  Fast detection of hydrogen with nano fiber tapers coated with ultra thin palladium layers. , 2005, Optics express.

[49]  Kai Tao,et al.  Surface Impregnation Combustion Method to Prepare Nanostructured Metallic Catalysts without Further Reduction: As-Burnt Co/SiO2 Catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis , 2011 .

[50]  Zhenhua Li,et al.  Review of recent development in Co-based catalysts supported on carbon materials for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis , 2015 .