Observer efficiency in boundary discrimination tasks related to assessment of breast lesions with ultrasound

The statistical efficiency of human observers in diagnostic tasks is an important measure of how effectively task relevant information in the image is being utilized. Most efficiency studies have investigated efficiency in terms of contrast or size effects. In many cases, malignant lesions will have similar contrast to normal or benign objects, but can be distinguished by properties of their boundary. We investigate this issue in the framework of malignant/benign discrimination tasks for the breast with ultrasound. In order to identify effects in terms of specific features and to control for other effects such as aberration or specular reflections, we simulate the formation of beam-formed radio-frequency (RF) data. We consider three tasks related to lesion boundaries including boundary eccentricity, boundary sharpness, and detection of boundary spiculations. We also consider standard detection and contrast discrimination tasks. We find that human observers exhibit surprisingly low efficiency with respect to the Ideal observer acting on RF data in boundary discrimination tasks (0.08%-3.3%), and that efficiency of human observers is substantially increased by Wiener-filtering RF frame data. We also find a limitation in efficiency is the computation of an envelope image from the RF data recorded by the transducer. Approximations to the Ideal observer acting on the envelope images indicate that humans may be substantially more efficient (10%-75%) with respect to the envelope Ideal observers. Our work suggests that significant diagnostic information may be lost in standard envelope processing in the formation of ultrasonic images.

[1]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[2]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Coded excitation system for improving the penetration of real-time phased-array imaging systems , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Stabilized estimates of Hotelling-observer detection performance in patient-structured noise , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[4]  E A Krupinski,et al.  The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[5]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Estimates of human-observer templates for a simple detection task in correlated noise , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[6]  W.F. Walker C- and D-weighted ultrasonic imaging using the translating apertures algorithm , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  Jie Liu,et al.  Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks Simulating Malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Pavel Crystal,et al.  Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  J. Yaoa,et al.  Parallel cascades: New ways to describe noise transfer in medical imaging systems , 2001 .

[11]  C Kimme-Smith,et al.  Breast sonography. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  J. Goodman Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns , 1963 .

[13]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[14]  Robert F. Wagner,et al.  Quadratic Tasks And The Ideal Observer , 1987, Medical Imaging.

[15]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[16]  C. M. Wardleworth,et al.  Breast sonography. , 1986, Radiography.

[17]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[18]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. , 1999, Radiology.

[19]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. , 1998, Radiology.