DESIGN AND VALIDATION OF AN ON-THE-GO SOIL STRENGTH PROFILE SENSOR

Soil strength has traditionally been determined using the cone penetrometer, an instrument that provides highly variable discrete point measurements, making it difficult to detect statistically significant differences in the soil strength profile among treatments or locations. Generally, this problem has been addressed by obtaining a large number of measurements, a process that is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Our objective was to develop a soil strength profile sensor (SSPS) that could take measurements continuously and more efficiently while traveling across the field. The on-the-go SSPS was designed and fabricated using an array of load cells, each of which was interfaced with a soil-cutting tip. These multiple prismatic tips were extended forward from the leading edge of a vertical blade and spaced apart to minimize interference from the main blade and adjacent sensing tips. Prismatic soil strength index (PSSI, MPa) was defined as the force divided by the base area of the sensing tip. The sensing tip had a 60° cutting or apex angle and a base area of 361 mm2. The design maximum operating depth was 0.5 m, and the upper limit and resolution of soil strength were 19.4 and 0.14 MPa, respectively. Field tests determined that the optimum extension and spacing of the cutting tips were 5.1 and 10 cm, respectively. A significant (. = 0.01) linear relationship between PSSI and penetrometer cone index (CI), with a slope of approximately 0.6, was found for field data collected at a 30 cm depth. The ability to develop such relationships comparing penetrometer and SSPS data will allow SSPS data to be interpreted with respect to the available body of penetrometer literature.

[1]  Dr. Ir. Adrianus Jozef Koolen,et al.  Agricultural Soil Mechanics , 1983, Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences.

[2]  Warren J. Busscher,et al.  IN SITU STRENGTH, BULK DENSITY, AND WATER CONTENT RELATIONSHIPS OF A DURINODIC XERIC HAPLOCALCID SOIL , 2001 .

[3]  A. Canarache,et al.  Factors and indices regarding excessive compactness of agricultural soils , 1991 .

[4]  R. L. Raper,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND CONCEPT EVALUATION OF AN ON-THE-GO SOIL STRENGTH MEASUREMENT SYSTEM , 2005 .

[5]  Jerzy Lipiec,et al.  Effects of soil compaction and tillage systems on uptake and losses of nutrients , 1995 .

[6]  Viacheslav I. Adamchuk,et al.  APPLICATION OF A STRAIN GAUGE ARRAY TO ESTIMATE SOIL MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE ON–THE–GO , 2001 .

[7]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Comparison of electromagnetic induction and direct sensing of soil electrical conductivity , 2003 .

[8]  J. Guérif,et al.  Effects of Compaction on Soil Strength Parameters , 1994 .

[9]  E. G. Humphries,et al.  A technique for horizontal measurement of soil mechanical impedance. , 1990 .

[10]  B. Jenkins,et al.  Evaluation of the UC Davis Compaction Profile Sensor , 2002 .

[11]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  On-the-go Soil Strength Profile Sensor Using a Load Cell Array , 2003 .

[12]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Modeling Soil Failure Caused by Prismatic and Conical Tools , 2003 .

[13]  D. J. Schuring,et al.  Soil Deforming Processes and Dimensional Analysis , 1964 .

[14]  R. L. Raper,et al.  TECHNICAL NOTES: A TRACTOR-MOUNTED MULTIPLE-PROBE SOIL CONE PENETROMETER , 1999 .

[15]  J. L. Glancey,et al.  An instrumented chisel for the study of soil-tillage dynamics , 1989 .

[16]  W. E. Larson,et al.  Soil Strength and Aeration Effects on Root Elongation1 , 1975 .

[17]  James L. Glancey,et al.  Prediction of agricultural implement draft using an instrumented analog tillage tool , 1996 .

[18]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Evaluation of penetrometers for measuring soil strength , 1977 .

[19]  J Vanbergeijk,et al.  PA—Precision AgricultureSoil Tillage Resistance as a Tool to map Soil Type Differences , 2001 .

[20]  C. G. Bowers,et al.  INSTANTANEOUS MULTIPLE-DEPTH SOIL MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE SENSING FROM A MOVING VEHICLE , 2005 .

[21]  C. W. Doty,et al.  RESIDUAL EFFECTS OF TILLAGE ON COASTAL PLAIN SOIL STRENGTH1 , 1986 .