Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Skaane,et al. Number and characteristics of breast cancer cases diagnosed in four periods in the screening interval of a biennial population-based screening programme , 2006, Journal of medical screening.
[2] P. Glasziou,et al. Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[3] J. Keen. Digital and film mammography. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.
[4] P. Skaane,et al. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a proper measurement for performance in breast cancer screening? , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[5] P. Skaane,et al. Follow-up and final results of the oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading , 2005, Acta radiologica.
[6] B. Viták,et al. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program. , 2005, Radiology.
[7] Alan C. Evans,et al. The pathological and radiological features of screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed following arbitration of discordant double reading opinions. , 2005, Clinical radiology.
[8] C. D'Orsi,et al. Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.
[9] E. Burnside,et al. The use of batch reading to improve the performance of screening mammography. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[10] S. Ciatto,et al. Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates. Results in the Florence screening programme , 2005, Journal of medical screening.
[11] Per Skaane,et al. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study. , 2004, Radiology.
[12] Harry J de Koning,et al. Independent double reading of screening mammograms in The Netherlands: effect of arbitration following reader disagreements. , 2004, Radiology.
[13] Per Skaane,et al. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study. , 2003, Radiology.
[14] Debra M Ikeda,et al. Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening. , 2003, Radiology.
[15] Elizabeth S Burnside,et al. Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[16] C. D'Orsi,et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[17] J. Baker,et al. Malignant lesions initially subjected to short-term mammographic follow-up. , 2002, Radiology.
[18] S. Moss,et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review. , 2001, Breast.
[19] M J Schell,et al. Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[20] J M Lewin,et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. , 2001, Radiology.
[21] Double reading of screening mammograms: the use of a third reader to arbitrate on disagreements , 1999 .
[22] Craig A. Beam,et al. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.
[23] J. Elmore,et al. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.
[24] E. Thurfjell,et al. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. , 1994, Radiology.
[25] Roland Holland,et al. The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen‐detected cancers , 1993, Cancer.