Visuospatial attention: how to measure effects of infrequent, unattended events in a blocked stimulus design

This fMRI study investigates the differences between a blocked and event-related analysis in a cued target detection task, the so-called Posner paradigm, using a hybrid design. Validly and invalidly cued trials were presented intermingled in different blocks containing 50%, 75%, or 100% valid trials. Four analyses were conducted: (i) an event-related analysis comparing invalid and valid trials, (ii) a blocked analysis comparing blocks with 50% valid and invalid trials to blocks with 100% valid trials, (iii) a blocked analysis detecting differences between block models when modeled as epochs or chains of events, and (iv) a blocked analysis that modeled blocks as chains of events to scale regressors equally to the event-related analysis. Irrespective of the type of analysis (blocked or event related), significant activation of the right intraparietal sulcus was observed. A larger cluster size was evident in the blocked analysis, which can be attributed to higher efficiency. In addition to this common right parietal activation, the event-related analysis revealed activations in right superior parietal cortex and left intraparietal sulcus. In contrast, the blocked analysis yielded additional activity in the right occipitoparietal junction. No influences of the block model (epoch versus chain of events) were found in regions activated in the blocked or event-related analysis, respectively. In summary, using a hybrid design and both event-related and blocked analysis techniques, we show both sustained and transient neural processes underlying reorienting of visuospatial attention.

[1]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural Systems for Visual Orienting and Their Relationships to Spatial Working Memory , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Jonides.  Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[3]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Inferential Impact of Global Signal Covariates in Functional Neuroimaging Analyses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[4]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Mixed blocked/event-related designs separate transient and sustained activity in fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[6]  Nicholas Lange,et al.  What can modern statistics offer imaging neuroscience? , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  T. Zandt.  Analysis of Response Time Distributions , 2002 .

[9]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[11]  Darren R Gitelman,et al.  ILAB: A program for postexperimental eye movement analysis , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[12]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural mechanisms associated with attention to temporal synchrony versus spatial orientation: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Cerebral correlates of alerting, orienting and reorienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[14]  K J Friston,et al.  The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. , 1999, Science.

[15]  K. Heilman,et al.  Right hemisphere dominance for attention , 1980, Neurology.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance of hemodynamic deconvolution , 2003, NeuroImage.

[17]  John T. Wixted,et al.  Methodology in experimental psychology , 2002 .

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Mesulam.  Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Experimental Design for Brain fMRI , 2000 .

[23]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[25]  W. Penny,et al.  Random-Effects Analysis , 2002 .

[26]  R. Henson,et al.  State-related and item-related neural correlates of successful memory encoding , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  A. Nobre,et al.  The Large-Scale Neural Network for Spatial Attention Displays Multifunctional Overlap But Differential Asymmetry , 1999, NeuroImage.

[28]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Mesulam.  A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[30]  S. Yantis,et al.  Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  Joseph A Maldjian,et al.  Separating neural processes using mixed event-related and epoch-based fMRI paradigms , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Critical Relationship between the Timing of Stimulus Presentation and Data Acquisition in Blocked Designs with fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.

[34]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Estimating efficiency a priori: a comparison of blocked and randomized designs , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  R. Klein,et al.  A review of the evidence for a disengage deficit following parietal lobe damage , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[37]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  R. Buckner,et al.  Dissociating Memory Retrieval Processes Using fMRI Evidence that Priming Does Not Support Recognition Memory , 2001, Neuron.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing event-related and epoch analysis in blocked design fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[40]  Paul Eelen.  Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (third edition) , 2003 .

[41]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Todd B. Parrish,et al.  The posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex mediate the anticipatory allocation of spatial attention , 2003, NeuroImage.

[43]  L. Riggio,et al.  The relationship between central cues and peripheral cues in covert visual orientation , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  D. Madden,et al.  Selective attention and visual search: revision of an allocation model and application to age differences. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Joel R. Meyer,et al.  A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Ambiguous Results in Functional Neuroimaging Data Analysis Due to Covariate Correlation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[49]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements , 1998, Neuron.

[50]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Left inferior parietal cortex integrates time and space during collision judgments , 2003, NeuroImage.

[51]  H Garavan,et al.  Artifactual fMRI group and condition differences driven by performance confounds , 2004, NeuroImage.