BULGE GROWTH AND QUENCHING SINCE z = 2.5 IN CANDELS/3D-HST

Exploiting the deep high-resolution imaging of all five CANDELS fields, and accurate redshift information provided by 3D-HST, we investigate the relation between structure and stellar populations for a mass-selected sample of 6764 galaxies above 1010 M☉, spanning the redshift range 0.5 < z < 2.5. For the first time, we fit two-dimensional models comprising a single Sérsic fit and two-component (i.e., bulge + disk) decompositions not only to the H-band light distributions, but also to the stellar mass maps reconstructed from resolved stellar population modeling. We confirm that the increased bulge prominence among quiescent galaxies, as reported previously based on rest-optical observations, remains in place when considering the distributions of stellar mass. Moreover, we observe an increase of the typical Sérsic index and bulge-to-total ratio (with median B/T reaching 40%–50%) among star-forming galaxies above 1011 M☉. Given that quenching for these most massive systems is likely to be imminent, our findings suggest that significant bulge growth precedes a departure from the star-forming main sequence. We demonstrate that the bulge mass (and ideally knowledge of the bulge and total mass) is a more reliable predictor of the star-forming versus quiescent state of a galaxy than the total stellar mass. The same trends are predicted by the state-of-the-art, semi-analytic model by Somerville et al. In this model, bulges and black holes grow hand in hand through merging and/or disk instabilities, and feedback from active galactic nuclei shuts off star formation. Further observations will be required to pin down star formation quenching mechanisms, but our results imply that they must be internal to the galaxies and closely associated with bulge growth.

[1]  D. Wake,et al.  3D-HST+CANDELS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE GALAXY SIZE–MASS DISTRIBUTION SINCE z = 3 , 2014, 1404.2844.

[2]  T. Takeuchi,et al.  ROTATIONAL INSTABILITY IN THE OUTER REGION OF PROTOPLANETARY DISKS , 2014, 1403.7607.

[3]  L. Simard,et al.  Bulge mass is king: the dominant role of the bulge in determining the fraction of passive galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2014, 1403.5269.

[4]  Shannon G. Patel,et al.  3D-HST WFC3-SELECTED PHOTOMETRIC CATALOGS IN THE FIVE CANDELS/3D-HST FIELDS: PHOTOMETRY, PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS, AND STELLAR MASSES , 2014, 1403.3689.

[5]  G. Zamorani,et al.  THE SINS/zC-SINF SURVEY OF z ∼ 2 GALAXY KINEMATICS: EVIDENCE FOR GRAVITATIONAL QUENCHING , 2013, 1310.3838.

[6]  A. Dekel,et al.  Wet Disc Contraction to Galactic Blue Nuggets and Quenching to Red Nuggets , 2013, 1310.1074.

[7]  S. E. Persson,et al.  GALAXY STELLAR MASS FUNCTIONS FROM ZFOURGE/CANDELS: AN EXCESS OF LOW-MASS GALAXIES SINCE z = 2 AND THE RAPID BUILDUP OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES , 2013, 1309.5972.

[8]  Christopher E. Moody,et al.  A Comparison between Semi-Analytic Model Predictions for the CANDELS Survey , 2013, 1312.3233.

[9]  Christopher E. Moody,et al.  CANDELS+3D-HST: COMPACT SFGs AT z ∼ 2–3, THE PROGENITORS OF THE FIRST QUIESCENT GALAXIES , 2013, 1311.5559.

[10]  G. Zamorani,et al.  THE SINS/zC-SINF SURVEY OF z ∼ 2 GALAXY KINEMATICS: EVIDENCE FOR POWERFUL ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS-DRIVEN NUCLEAR OUTFLOWS IN MASSIVE STAR-FORMING GALAXIES , 2013, 1311.2596.

[11]  B. Lundgren,et al.  A CANDELS–3D-HST SYNERGY: RESOLVED STAR FORMATION PATTERNS AT 0.7 < z < 1.5 , 2013, 1310.5702.

[12]  S. Faber,et al.  A LINK BETWEEN STAR FORMATION QUENCHING AND INNER STELLAR MASS DENSITY IN SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY CENTRAL GALAXIES , 2013, 1308.5224.

[13]  Henry C. Ferguson,et al.  CANDELS: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN GALAXY MORPHOLOGY AND STAR FORMATION ACTIVITY AT z ∼ 2 , 2013, 1306.4980.

[14]  H. Rix,et al.  STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES TO z = 2.5 IN CANDELS , 2013, 1305.6931.

[15]  J. Dunlop,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF THE STELLAR MASS FUNCTIONS OF STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES TO z = 4 FROM THE COSMOS/UltraVISTA SURVEY , 2013, 1303.4409.

[16]  A. Cimatti,et al.  The deepest Herschel-PACS far-infrared survey: number counts and infrared luminosity functions from combined PEP/GOODS-H observations , 2013, 1303.4436.

[17]  C. Conselice,et al.  CONSTRAINING THE ASSEMBLY OF NORMAL AND COMPACT PASSIVELY EVOLVING GALAXIES FROM REDSHIFT z = 3 TO THE PRESENT WITH CANDELS , 2013, 1303.2689.

[18]  W. Brandt,et al.  NUCLEAR ACTIVITY IS MORE PREVALENT IN STAR-FORMING GALAXIES , 2013, 1302.1202.

[19]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  On the evolution of the bi-modal distribution of galaxies in the plane of specific star formation rate versus stellar mass , 2013, 1301.5025.

[20]  H. Rix,et al.  THE RADIAL DISTRIBUTION OF STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES AT z ∼ 1 FROM THE 3D-HST SURVEY , 2013, 1301.0320.

[21]  R. Teyssier,et al.  The ATLAS3D project - XXII. Low-efficiency star formation in early-type galaxies: hydrodynamic models and observations , 2012, 1212.2288.

[22]  G. Illingworth,et al.  THE STELLAR MASS STRUCTURE OF MASSIVE GALAXIES FROM z = 0 TO z = 2.5: SURFACE DENSITY PROFILES AND HALF-MASS RADII , 2012, 1208.4363.

[23]  P. Norberg,et al.  THE ZURICH ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (ZENS) OF GALAXIES IN GROUPS ALONG THE COSMIC WEB. II. GALAXY STRUCTURAL MEASUREMENTS AND THE CONCENTRATION OF MORPHOLOGICALLY CLASSIFIED SATELLITES IN DIVERSE ENVIRONMENTS , 2012, 1206.6108.

[24]  S. White,et al.  Galaxy formation in WMAP1 and WMAP7 cosmologies , 2012, 1206.0052.

[25]  J. Newman,et al.  Dependence of galaxy quenching on halo mass and distance from its centre , 2012, 1203.1625.

[26]  Chien Y. Peng,et al.  STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS OF GALAXIES IN CANDELS , 2012, 1211.6954.

[27]  C. Conselice,et al.  THE DEPENDENCE OF QUENCHING UPON THE INNER STRUCTURE OF GALAXIES AT 0.5 ⩽ z < 0.8 IN THE DEEP2/AEGIS SURVEY , 2012, 1210.4173.

[28]  D. Schiminovich,et al.  THE IMPACT OF INTERACTIONS, BARS, BULGES, AND ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI ON STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY IN LOCAL MASSIVE GALAXIES , 2012, 1209.0476.

[29]  Carnegie,et al.  CANDELS: THE PROGENITORS OF COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2012, 1206.5000.

[30]  M. Cirasuolo,et al.  The Morphologies of Massive Galaxies at 1, 2012, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

[31]  Michael R. Merrifield,et al.  The structures of distant galaxies - V. The evolution of galaxy structure in stellar mass at z < 1 , 2012, 1206.3808.

[32]  A. M. Swinbank,et al.  Energetic galaxy-wide outflows in high-redshift ultraluminous infrared galaxies hosting AGN activity , 2012, 1205.1801.

[33]  G. Brammer,et al.  THE STAR FORMATION MASS SEQUENCE OUT TO z = 2.5 , 2012, 1205.0547.

[34]  B. Weiner,et al.  CANDELS: CORRELATIONS OF SPECTRAL ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS AND MORPHOLOGIES WITH STAR FORMATION STATUS FOR MASSIVE GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2012, 1204.4194.

[35]  Garth D. Illingworth,et al.  3D-HST: A WIDE-FIELD GRISM SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY WITH THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE , 2012, 1204.2829.

[36]  J. Newman,et al.  SMOOTH(ER) STELLAR MASS MAPS IN CANDELS: CONSTRAINTS ON THE LONGEVITY OF CLUMPS IN HIGH-REDSHIFT STAR-FORMING GALAXIES , 2012, 1203.2611.

[37]  H. Rix,et al.  SPATIALLY RESOLVED Hα MAPS AND SIZES OF 57 STRONGLY STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT z ∼ 1 FROM 3D-HST: EVIDENCE FOR RAPID INSIDE-OUT ASSEMBLY OF DISK GALAXIES , 2012, 1202.1822.

[38]  A. Marconi,et al.  Observational evidence of quasar feedback quenching star formation at high redshift , 2011, 1112.3071.

[39]  Stijn Wuyts,et al.  WHAT TURNS GALAXIES OFF? THE DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIES OF STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES SINCE z ∼ 2 FROM CANDELS , 2011, 1110.3786.

[40]  H. Ferguson,et al.  MULTI-WAVELENGTH VIEW OF KILOPARSEC-SCALE CLUMPS IN STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2011, 1110.3800.

[41]  K. Alatalo,et al.  The ATLAS3D project – XI. Dense molecular gas properties of CO-luminous early-type galaxies , 2011, 1112.3641.

[42]  H. Rix,et al.  FIRST RESULTS FROM THE 3D-HST SURVEY: THE STRIKING DIVERSITY OF MASSIVE GALAXIES AT z > 1 , 2011, 1108.6060.

[43]  A. Cimatti,et al.  THE LESSER ROLE OF STARBURSTS IN STAR FORMATION AT z = 2 , 2011, 1108.0933.

[44]  A. Koekemoer,et al.  GALAXY STRUCTURE AND MODE OF STAR FORMATION IN THE SFR–MASS PLANE FROM z ∼ 2.5 TO z ∼ 0.1 , 2011, 1107.0317.

[45]  B. Magnelli,et al.  PACS Evolutionary Probe (PEP) – a Herschel key program , 2011, 1106.3285.

[46]  B. Lundgren,et al.  THE NEWFIRM MEDIUM-BAND SURVEY: PHOTOMETRIC CATALOGS, REDSHIFTS, AND THE BIMODAL COLOR DISTRIBUTION OF GALAXIES OUT TO z ∼ 3 , 2011, 1105.4609.

[47]  S. Ravindranath,et al.  CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.

[48]  Kyoung-Soo Lee,et al.  THE NUMBER DENSITY AND MASS DENSITY OF STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES AT 0.4 ⩽ z ⩽ 2.2 , 2011, 1104.2595.

[49]  A. Omont,et al.  The dynamics of the ionized and molecular interstellar medium in powerful obscured quasars at z≥ 3.5 , 2011, 1104.0937.

[50]  R. Genzel,et al.  CONSTRAINTS ON THE ASSEMBLY AND DYNAMICS OF GALAXIES. II. PROPERTIES OF KILOPARSEC-SCALE CLUMPS IN REST-FRAME OPTICAL EMISSION OF z ∼ 2 STAR-FORMING GALAXIES , 2011, 1104.0248.

[51]  A. Fontana,et al.  COLOR AND STELLAR POPULATION GRADIENTS IN PASSIVELY EVOLVING GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 FROM HST/WFC3 DEEP IMAGING IN THE HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD , 2011, 1101.0843.

[52]  A. Cimatti,et al.  Star formation rates and masses of z∼ 2 galaxies from multicolour photometry , 2010, 1004.4546.

[53]  Garth D. Illingworth,et al.  CONFIRMATION OF THE COMPACTNESS OF A z = 1.91 QUIESCENT GALAXY WITH HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE’S WIDE FIELD CAMERA 3 , 2010, 1004.1411.

[54]  B. Garilli,et al.  MASS AND ENVIRONMENT AS DRIVERS OF GALAXY EVOLUTION IN SDSS AND zCOSMOS AND THE ORIGIN OF THE SCHECHTER FUNCTION , 2010, 1003.4747.

[55]  A. Klypin,et al.  DARK MATTER HALOS IN THE STANDARD COSMOLOGICAL MODEL: RESULTS FROM THE BOLSHOI SIMULATION , 2010, 1002.3660.

[56]  Princeton University.,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTIES AFFECTING THE STELLAR MASS–HALO MASS RELATION FOR 0 < z < 4 , 2010, 1001.0015.

[57]  Chien Y. Peng,et al.  DETAILED DECOMPOSITION OF GALAXY IMAGES. II. BEYOND AXISYMMETRIC MODELS , 2009, 0912.0731.

[58]  G. Brammer,et al.  THE DEAD SEQUENCE: A CLEAR BIMODALITY IN GALAXY COLORS FROM z = 0 to z = 2.5 , 2009, 0910.2227.

[59]  S. Wuyts,et al.  THE SIZE-STAR FORMATION RELATION OF MASSIVE GALAXIES AT 1.5 < z < 2.5 , 2009, 0909.0750.

[60]  G. Illingworth,et al.  THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE BEYOND z = 2 FOR MASSIVE GALAXIES: CONTRASTING LARGE STAR-FORMING AND COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXIES , 2009, 0909.0260.

[61]  R. Teyssier,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION: MAKING EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES RED , 2009, 0905.4669.

[62]  Iap Paris,et al.  Resolved stellar mass maps of galaxies. I: method and implications for global mass estimates , 2009, 0904.4252.

[63]  R. Somerville,et al.  CONSTRAINTS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STELLAR MASS AND HALO MASS AT LOW AND HIGH REDSHIFT , 2009, 0903.4682.

[64]  Shy Genel,et al.  THE SINS SURVEY: SINFONI INTEGRAL FIELD SPECTROSCOPY OF z ∼ 2 STAR-FORMING GALAXIES , 2009, 0903.1872.

[65]  Lars Hernquist,et al.  The effects of gas on morphological transformation in mergers: implications for bulge and disc demographics , 2009, 0901.4111.

[66]  B. Elmegreen,et al.  BULGE AND CLUMP EVOLUTION IN HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD CLUMP CLUSTERS, CHAINS AND SPIRAL GALAXIES , 2008, 0810.5404.

[67]  R. Teyssier,et al.  Cold streams in early massive hot haloes as the main mode of galaxy formation , 2008, Nature.

[68]  M. Franx,et al.  SUBMITTED TO THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 DETECTION OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES IN A BICOLOR SEQUENCE FROM Z = 0 − 2 , 2022 .

[69]  Marijn Franx,et al.  Structure and Star Formation in Galaxies out to z = 3: Evidence for Surface Density Dependent Evolution and Upsizing , 2008, 0808.2642.

[70]  P. Hopkins,et al.  A semi-analytic model for the co-evolution of galaxies, black holes and active galactic nuclei , 2008, 0808.1227.

[71]  P. S. Bunclark,et al.  Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems , 2008 .

[72]  E. Bell Galaxy Bulges and their Black Holes: a Requirement for the Quenching of Star Formation , 2008, 0804.4001.

[73]  Benjamin D. Johnson,et al.  The UV-Optical Color Magnitude Diagram. II. Physical Properties and Morphological Evolution On and Off of a Star-forming Sequence , 2007, 0711.4823.

[74]  A. Dekel,et al.  Gravitational quenching in massive galaxies and clusters by clumpy accretion , 2007, 0707.1214.

[75]  A. Cimatti,et al.  Multiwavelength Study of Massive Galaxies at z~2. I. Star Formation and Galaxy Growth , 2007, 0705.2831.

[76]  J. Starck,et al.  The reversal of the star formation-density relation in the distant universe , 2007, astro-ph/0703653.

[77]  A. Dekel,et al.  Bursting and quenching in massive galaxies without major mergers or AGNs , 2007, astro-ph/0703435.

[78]  D. Calzetti,et al.  The COSMOS Survey: Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Observations and Data Processing , 2007, astro-ph/0703095.

[79]  P. P. van der Werf,et al.  What Do We Learn from IRAC Observations of Galaxies at 2 < z < 3.5? , 2006, astro-ph/0609548.

[80]  E. L. Wright,et al.  The All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS) Data Sets , 2006, astro-ph/0607355.

[81]  G. Lemson,et al.  Halo and Galaxy Formation Histories from the Millennium Simulation: Public release of a VO-oriented and SQL-queryable database for studying the evolution of galaxies in the LambdaCDM cosmogony , 2006, astro-ph/0608019.

[82]  J. Brinkmann,et al.  Gas infall and stochastic star formation in galaxies in the local universe , 2005, astro-ph/0510405.

[83]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  The many lives of active galactic nuclei: cooling flows, black holes and the luminosities and colour , 2005, astro-ph/0508046.

[84]  P. Hopkins,et al.  A Unified, Merger-driven Model of the Origin of Starbursts, Quasars, the Cosmic X-Ray Background, Supermassive Black Holes, and Galaxy Spheroids , 2005, astro-ph/0506398.

[85]  Volker Springel,et al.  The Many lives of AGN: Cooling flows, black holes and the luminosities and colours of galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0602065.

[86]  J. Peacock,et al.  Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars , 2005, Nature.

[87]  A. Szalay,et al.  Galaxy Luminosity Functions to z~1 from DEEP2 and COMBO-17: Implications for Red Galaxy Formation , 2005, astro-ph/0506044.

[88]  Jia-Sheng Huang,et al.  Ultraviolet to Mid-Infrared Observations of Star-forming Galaxies at z ~ 2: Stellar Masses and Stellar Populations , 2005, astro-ph/0503485.

[89]  R. Bouwens,et al.  The DEEP Groth Strip Survey. VIII. The Evolution of Luminous Field Bulges at Redshift z ∼ 1 , 2004, astro-ph/0412004.

[90]  A. Szalay,et al.  The DEEP Groth Strip Galaxy Redshift Survey. III. Redshift Catalog and Properties of Galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0411128.

[91]  R. Saglia,et al.  Structural properties of discs and bulges of early-type galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0410121.

[92]  J. Kormendy,et al.  Secular Evolution and the Formation of Pseudobulges in Disk Galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0407343.

[93]  Hans-Walter Rix,et al.  On the Black Hole Mass-Bulge Mass Relation , 2004, astro-ph/0402376.

[94]  Heidelberg,et al.  Nearly 5000 Distant Early-Type Galaxies in COMBO-17: A Red Sequence and Its Evolution since z ~ 1 , 2003, astro-ph/0303394.

[95]  G. Bruzual,et al.  Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003 , 2003, astro-ph/0309134.

[96]  S. M. Fall,et al.  The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: Initial Results from Optical and Near-Infrared Imaging , 2003, astro-ph/0309105.

[97]  Michele Cappellari,et al.  Adaptive spatial binning of integral-field spectroscopic data using Voronoi tessellations , 2003, astro-ph/0302262.

[98]  Y. Birnboim,et al.  Virial shocks in galactic haloes , 2003, astro-ph/0302161.

[99]  R. Nichol,et al.  The dependence of star formation history and internal structure on stellar mass for 105 low‐redshift galaxies , 2002, astro-ph/0205070.

[100]  V. Narayanan,et al.  Color Separation of Galaxy Types in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Imaging Data , 2001, astro-ph/0107201.

[101]  H. Ferguson,et al.  The Stellar Populations and Evolution of Lyman Break Galaxies , 2000, astro-ph/0105087.

[102]  A. Kinney,et al.  The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies , 1999, astro-ph/9911459.

[103]  Jr.,et al.  The Global Schmidt law in star forming galaxies , 1997, astro-ph/9712213.

[104]  S. White,et al.  The formation of galactic discs , 1997, astro-ph/9707093.

[105]  R. Peletier,et al.  THE SHAPE OF THE LUMINOSITY PROFILES OF BULGES OF SPIRAL GALAXIES , 1995 .

[106]  H. Ford,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope photometry of the central regions of Virgo Cluster elliptical galaxies. 1: Observations, discussion, and conclusions , 1994 .

[107]  H. Ford,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope photometry of the central regions of Virgo cluster elliptical galaxies. II : Isophote shapes. , 1994 .

[108]  H. Ford,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope photometry of the central regions of Virgo cluster elliptical galaxies. 3: Brightness profiles , 1994 .