experimental animals: Cautionary notes Constructing receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) with

References http://learnmem.cshlp.org/content/15/9/687.full.html#related-urls Article cited in: http://learnmem.cshlp.org/content/15/9/687.full.html#ref-list-1 This article cites 26 articles Related Content Learn. Mem. September , 2008 15: 691-693 Howard Eichenbaum, Magdalena M. Sauvage, Norbert J. Fortin, et al. ROCs in rats? Response to Wixted and Squire service Email alerting click here top right corner of the article or Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article sign up in the box at the

[1]  Michael R. Healy,et al.  Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: evidence from receiver operating characteristics. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  K. White,et al.  On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample. , 2005, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Impaired memory for scenes but not faces in developmental hippocampal amnesia: A case study , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  C. Rotello,et al.  Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Scott D. Slotnick,et al.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[6]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. , 1999 .

[7]  B B Murdock,et al.  Criterion change in continuous recognition memory. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  R. Tunney,et al.  Effects of retention intervals on receiver operating characteristics in artificial grammar learning. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[9]  The effect of sample and comparison ratio schedules on delayed matching to sample in the pigeon , 1978 .

[10]  G. Kimble,et al.  Recognition memory for words and pictures at short and long retention intervals , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[11]  James P. Egan,et al.  Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. , 1958 .

[12]  M. Davison,et al.  Signal probability, reinforcement and signal detection. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  T. DeMarse,et al.  Enhancement of matching acquisition by differential comparison-outcome associations. , 1993 .

[14]  M. A. Trapold,et al.  Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different , 1970 .

[15]  K. Norman,et al.  Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia , 2007, Hippocampus.

[16]  J. Wixted.  A Signal Detection Analysis of Memory for Nonoccurrence in Pigeons , 1993 .

[17]  A. Yonelinas.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus , 2004, Nature.

[19]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  Stability of memory for colour in context. , 1998, Memory.

[20]  J. Wixted.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[21]  Caren M. Rotello,et al.  Recall-to-Reject in Recognition: Evidence from ROC Curves ☆ ☆☆ , 2000 .

[22]  A. Yonelinas.  Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[23]  A. Heathcote.  Item Recognition Memory and the ROC , 2003 .

[24]  Howard Eichenbaum,et al.  Recognition memory: opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Peter E. Wais,et al.  The Hippocampus Supports both the Recollection and the Familiarity Components of Recognition Memory , 2006, Neuron.

[26]  W. Roberts,et al.  Reinforcement expectancy and trial spacing effects in delayed matching-to-sample by pigeons , 1985 .

[27]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.